SIGHTINGS



The Arch-Druid's Last
Charge - David Brower
Of The Sierra Club
By Jeffrey St. Clair and Alexander Cockburn
www.protest.net
6-7-99
 
 
It's been three decades, but he's making one last charge.
 
Thirty years ago this spring David Brower, the man later dubbed "the Arch-Druid" stood at what seemed the apex of his vocation as America's most effective green crusader. Under his leadership the Sierra Club had turned from an elite hiking club of some 2,000 members into a vibrant movement of 77,000. When Brower's Sierra Club stood up for a river, a canyon, a mountain range or a forest, or against nuclear power plants, politicians had to listen.
 
Brower kept dams out of the Grand Canyon. He engineered passage of the Wilderness Act, setting aside tens of millions of acres of public lands. If it had not been for Brower, Alaska would have become a back lot of the oil and timber corporations.
 
Brower made some deals he learned to regret: he traded Glen Canyon, upriver from the Grand Canyon, to keep a dam out of Dinosaur National Monument. But unlike many of his environmental progeny, he acknowledged the blunder, remarking famously, "Never trade a place you've seen for one you haven't." Ultimately his audacity proved too much for the club he'd built from almost nothing. On May 3, 1969, in one of the most notorious evictions in American environmental history, the board of the Sierra Club threw out their leader.
 
Brower didn't slow down. He founded Friends of the Earth, which globalized environmental issues and made arms control a green concern. Ultimately Brower's aversion to compromise proved too much for this organization too, and he was driven out. Off went Brower to Earth Island Institute where his astounding creativity as an organizer fostered an umbrella for grassroots activists working on issues ranging from the threat to Siberian forests to the plight of the dolphins and turtles.
 
Along with his drive and vision there's always been a humanity to Brower markedly absent in many green crusaders. Earth Island became an advocate for environmental justice, bringing social issues--urban population, toxic dumping, the environmental degradation of poor communities--within the purview of green organizers.
 
Brower is eighty-six years old now. He's not slowed up. The last few weeks have seen him in New York, battling Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who wants to sell off the city's communal gardens; then in Houston where he's helping to cement an unusual alliance between steelworkers and Earth First!ers, both of whom have a common enemy in the form of Maxxam boss, Charles Hurwitz. Above all, he's in the last moments of a drive to be elected president of the Sierra Club's board.
 
Since Brower was fired thirty years ago, the Sierra Club has all too often stumbled, victim to one unrewarding bout of political expediency after another. There's been open civil war between the business-as-usual Old Guard, mustered around executive director Carl Pope, and the thousands of militant grassroots club members in chapters across the country.
 
To the Sierra Club's Old Guard, conservative and timid, the prospect of Browerian irruption is horrifying. The vote, by the Club's board, is scheduled for Saturday, May 22. The pro-Brower forces were jubilant earlier in the month when the reform faction, known as the John Muir Sierrans, captured some crucial slots, but the old Guard is exerting tremendous pressure on these new board members to turn back Brower and re-elect the incumbent, Chuck McGrady, a pliant status-quo type from North Carolina. [Update: Brower lost his race to become president of the Sierra Club in a 10-3 vote. The election was a triumph for the Old Guard faction of the Club, with Anne Ehrlich, the anti-immigrant zealot, being elected treasurer.]
 
Watching the struggle with considerable trepidation is Al Gore, whose prime political card in his stumbling bid for the Democratic nomination is his claim to the green vote. Brower is the man who originally led the Sierra Club into direct political endorsements. Brower is also the man who remarked on the eve of the 1996 presidential election that Clinton/Gore had done less for the environment than Reagan or Bush.
 
Sierra Old Guard's Panic
 
When we reported in last week's AVA (Anderson Valley Advertiser) on Brower's efforts to capture the Sierra Club's presidency, the article went like a rocket through Sierra Club fax machines and e-mail accounts. Within hours of the AVA hitting the streets, we were besieged with e-mails from excited or furious Sierra Clubbers. The Arch-Druid himself got a message from Sierra Club president Chuck McGrady. This Christian from North Carolina gave vent to un-Christian boasting, including his claim that he has an invincible bloc of nine votes in his pocket. He also pleaded with Brower to repudiate our AVA article. Laura Hoehn, another Sierra Club big-wig and former John Muir Sierran, told Brower he should withdraw because of our piece. Nowhere else in the United States has there been a single word printed about this noble last campaign by America's greatest enviro-warrior. Following is Brower's response:
 
TO: Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair cc: Sierra Club Board of Directors and Directors-Elect; Laura Hoehn FROM: Dave Brower
 
Chuck McGrady has asked me to repudiate your "Whither the Sierra Club?" article, but, with no knowledge of your sources, I have no basis for correcting any of its data. I think the objecting members of the Board can repudiate these on their own, if they wish. Chuck has also drafted a letter that I will soon sign that calls for renewed civility within the Club. I stand by this call for disagreement without disrespect and would hope to see this idea spread beyond the Club as well. You will not, however, soon find me challenging the right of members of the press to express their opinions, simply because they are inflammatory and controversial. I will confirm that you quoted me accurately and I only regret that your kindness fell heavily on me and not at all on some others. You know that I did not ask for your article or contribute to it, though I too have been unsettled by some recent (and some not-so-recent) developments in the Sierra Club. I guess that I am able to forgive more easily than some, including my wife Anne, who has yet to forgive the Gang of '69 who fired me as Executive Director.
 
While I am not comfortable with many of your allegations against past, present, and future members of the Board, we all know (or should) that such politicking and backstabbing is not without precedent on the Board of Directors, especially in recent years. In last year's officer elections, I thought I would win, but lost by two votes. I learned from a member of the Board that in that vote, Carl Pope lobbied against me, saying that my election would make him nervous. It shouldn't have; as I said, I am able to forgive when given the opportunity.
 
You correctly pointed out that this year's election brought me more support only in theory. Now, because of an article I did not write, Laura said I should withdraw my candidacy entirely. Even this is a step up from Phil Berry, who never wanted me to run in the first place. I have come to expect this from Phil, who has spent the last thirty years ridiculing most of the things I wanted to do, most recently on sparing the National Forests. As usual, his wife is with him on this and when Michele was President, she and Carl Pope juggled the ballot statement for endorsing the Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act so that supporters of it had to vote No to endorse. The measure narrowly lost in the member voting. The following year, unfettered by such hooliganism, the measure to call for an end to commercial logging on public lands passed two to one. But Phil also ridiculed my being nominated (three times) for the Nobel Peace Prize, and then I got the Blue Planet Prize (from Japan; $400K), so I won't fuss too much more.
 
Which brings us to the state of my presidential campaign today. Chuck says he "has" nine or ten votes, which doesn't leave many for me. I'm not greedy, all I ask is for as many as it takes (eight) to give the Sierra Club one last shot before I close the book on my sixty-five years of service. Whatever the election results, the Club is in dramatic need of a spiritual and structural overhaul that allows our Board to be leaders in helping direct the substance, not merely the procedures of the Sierra Club. I have seen enough of the Club fiddling while the Earth burns to last several lifetimes. Several hundred lifetimes before my own, the prophet Isaiah made a statement that the country's largest environmental group would do well to address: "Thou hast multiplied the nation, but not increased the joy."
 
We have indeed multiplied the membership and the budget, but where is the vision, the passion, the joy? Let's quit our bitching and get on to creating some joy on the planet."
 
--Jeffrey St. Clair and Alexander Cockburn






SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE