-
- The Jefferson County Sheriff Department's final report
on the investigation of the Columbine High School shootings reads more
like a high school drama production than an investigative document. The
report, written by 3 women writers hired by the Sheriff's department, is
not professional in either tone or approach. It makes wordy' emotional
comments rather than stick to the facts. It tries overly hard to paint
a confused, irrational picture of events so as to justify all the failures
of authorities to intervene quickly to save lives. The writers comment
and argue for one position only--that there were only two shooters--and
yet the report systematically refuses to discuss any specific evidence
that would allow a reader to make an independent judgment of any controversy.
This report is pure propaganda. Like the multi-tome Warren Commission report
on the JFK assassination' the report's entire purpose is to cover-up all
evidence contrary to the desired lone assassins conclusion. What can't
be covered up is omitted altogether or simply explained away as "misunderstandings
by witness.
-
- There are 15 lawsuits pending over government actions
or inaction at Columbine, and the report is careful to evade the specific
facts or evidence that the plaintiffs need to bring government and police
officials to justice. I've have waded through most of it and it is my opinion
that the report is noteworthy not by what is in it, but by what is explicitly
absent. The report doesn't answer or explain:
-
- · why it took SWAT teams more than 45 minutes
to enter the school and 3 hours to reach the library. · why teacher
Sanders and other injured students were not reached until hours after the
shooting stopped. · why NATO units and a 2 star general were involved
and how they happened to be in the area. · why students were pressured
to change their stories to conform to the two-shooter theory · why
there was a massive military presence at the Columbine memorial services
months later.
-
-
- The report goes out of its way to paint a detailed scenario
that gives the impression of completeness. It is easy to do since there
are so many trivial details that can be used to obscure more important
ones. The report describes the initial confusion and bewilderment of law
enforcement on the scene, claiming there were too many agencies, too many
conflicting 911 reports, and not enough coordination. That may sound plausible,
and certainly explains why they would wait for a unified SWAT team to arrive
for the actual assault. But after the SWAT team arrives fairly quickly'
we are given no credible explanation of why they waited and waited to enter.
This is something they are trained to do without pre-planning. The reader
cries out for answers and gets none. The report doesn't even bring up the
question directly.
-
- In the report's introductory remarks it uses a standard
legal trick to justify its refusal to discuss details, saying this is still
an "open investigation and "to preserve the privacy of witnesses
who are not yet in the public eye, we have excluded certain names and details
from this report. What an understatement. There is only one reason those
witnesses are not yet in the public eye--because the authorities don't
want them there. Just like the manipulated results of the TWA 800 investigation'
over 80 witnesses to the missile attack were coerced and threatened into
silence or into changing their stories. Many student witnesses have reported
identical treatment at the hands of federal and state investigators. Clearly
every official had their marching orders: to gather evidence that only
harris and klebold were involved in the columbine massacre.
-
- In May of 1999 Mark Taylor, a Columbine student injured
in the shooting was still in the hospital. A friend came to visit and found
Mark's mother rather upset. She said her son was getting death threats--someone
is threatening to finish off the injured students and the rest of Columbine.
She also said that so many Columbine students know of other assailants
being involved that she sees no way the truth about this could be covered
up. That assessment has proven to be very naive.
-
- Internet reporter John Quinn of News Hawk, Inc (newshawk@iname.com)
Tel: 707 984-7178 was one of the few able to penetrate the threat barriers
and get one of the eye witness students to talk. Quinn's initial conversations
with the parents of the student, Chris Whisher, indicated they were clearly
afraid and said they didn't want him talking to their son. When Quinn called
back to ask the parents another question' Chris himself answered the phone
and seemed willing to talk. Chris told Quinn' "They were just shooting
everywhere" He added that the suspect who shot at his group was wearing
a black coat, sunglasses and a BERET. All the others who saw Klebold and
Harris said they were wearing ear protectors and white and black T shirts,
respectively. The surveillance cameras confirmed the T shirt apparel.
-
- Chris told him that lots of students saw other shooters--as
many as 7 or 8 at one time. He said he knew personally of a girl who was
coerced into changing her testimony by Sheriffs investigators, and made
to say that she had only seen Harris and Klebold. Quinn said Chris reverified
that statement in another session and added that other friends of his had
personally witnessed a group of 7-8 individuals in trenchcoats, with weapons,
shooting in a different part of the school simultaneous to Harris and Klebold
firing weapons elsewhere. Quinn asked whether his friend knew if some or
all of these other shooters were students. He responded that only some
were students. Chris himself told Quinn that he was later requestioned
and pressured by investigators, who then tried to make a substantial effort
to "help" Chris "understand how it may have only been Harris
and Klebold" that he had seen at Columbine.
-
- I reported last year in July how another witness was
worked over by investigators to convince her that what she saw wasn't possible.
Columbine High School art teacher Patti Nielson' wounded in the school
attack, made unwitting statements that cast grave doubts on the official
two- gunmen theory. Teacher Nielson and student Brian Anderson observed
and were shot by what she said was a "MAN outside the school on the
upper terrace using a semi-automatic pistol. She said he was dressed in
black and was shooting a gun toward the parking lot. She yelled at him
to stop because she "thought he was doing a dumb thing." She
then said the man turned, grinned and shot at her. Describing him initially
as "small she later recanted upon being told by officials who the
shooters "really were and said, "I thought he was small, but
I found out later he was pretty tall!" However, during the prior events,
the teacher (trained to see details) continually referred to the assailant
as a man' both during her 911 call and in other statements.
-
- Despite all the harassment, there were numerous students
who refused to be cowed by the pressure. The report tried to pass off these
witnesses as an anomaly with this self-serving statement: "Despite
the supporting evidence, both from ballistics and eyewitness accounts,
that only two people, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, were the gunmen on
April 20, 1999, seven eyewitnesses remain firm in their account of another
person with a gun that day. Naturally' the report denies us the specific
testimony of these holdouts. In fact, they weren't just saying there was
ONE other person' but multiple shooters. I,m sure they would have an interesting
rebuttal to this report--something like "I can count, can't I??? TWA
800 witnesses to the missile kill were equally outraged when FBI agents
kept trying to convince them that what they saw going UP must have, in
fact been coming DOWN! There is a pattern to these cover-ups.
-
- In conclusion #4 the report boldly proclaims, "Physical
evidence does not indicate the presence of a third shooter. No known evidence
exists that anyone had prior knowledge of the killer's plans. Wrong on
both counts. Here are the facts on the physical evidence:
-
- · Art teacher Patti Nielson was shot by a man
from the outside of the school. The bullet penetrated a sliding glass door.
That's PHYSICAL EVIDENCE of a third shooter since Harris and Klebold were
already inside the school and had entered from the opposite and lower side
of the building. Curiously' no mention was made of this glass with the
exterior penetration--a convenient omission.
-
- · Jefferson County District Court Judge Henry
Nieto on May 28, 1999 refused to release autopsy reports on victims of
the Columbine High School shootings, saying "the community" would
suffer substantial harm if the reports were released. This order conveniently
included the bodies of Klebold and Harris, so we have no way to independently
ascertain the claim that they shot themselves. Once again' no physical
evidence exists because it is hidden by the court.
-
- · The FBI's notorious ballistics lab did all the
certification that all bullets came from Harris and Klebold's weapons.
Of course, there was no verifiable evidence trail produced to prove this
assertion. A good evidence trail would have non-FBI autopsy physicians
tagging each bullet as it came from each body and separately by more different
independent labs. None of this evidentiary trail exists. Even if it did,
the FBI has been known to swap bullets at will, as they did in the Oswald-JFK
case trying to shore up the lone assassin theory. The government had JFK's
body altered enroute to Bethesda Naval Hospital to remove other bullet
fragments and coerced the Navy Doctor to change his autopsy report to match
the altered results. Similar coercion took place in the Ron Brown autopsy
and with Vince Foster's murder. Incidentally' the Supreme Court weighed
in this week on the side of cover-up by refusing to allow Vince Foster's
autopsy photos to be released to the public.
-
- Here are the facts about the report's claim that no one
had "prior knowledge of the killer's plans.
-
- · The report conveniently mentions the two video
tapes of Klebold and Harris talking among themselves about their bombs
and plans, but fails to mention the pre-enactment video made by the Trenchcoat
Mafia in 1997. This video taped a practice run by the Trenchcoat Mafia
of this massacre in the actual halls of Columbine High School. True, Klebold
and Harris weren't in this video, but the cameraman was none other than
the son of FBI special agent Fusilier, the FBI psychologist who is a paid
FBI investigation for the Columbine tragedy. The young Fusilier was a Columbine
student at the time and a member of the Trenchcoat Mafia.
-
- Two of the participants in the pre-enactment video were
the Brown brothers, who were at Columbine during the shooting, and who
knew Klebold and Harris. John Quinn pointed out something suspicious in
the Brown brother's testimony about their involvement during the massacre.
Quinn said, "It had previously been reported that Brook's older brother
was inside the building and this fact was known by the elder Brooks when
he claims he was warned away from the school by Harris. Brooks uses this
alibi to shore up his case that he would never have been involved in any
way with the massacre. Another testified that Brook's brother was on the
stairway and was fired at directly by Harris but not hit. What's interesting
however is that in their appearance on Oprah Winfrey's show on May 20,
1999, it is the older Brown boy who said he was in the cafeteria when the
shooting broke out and he never saw either Harris or Klebold directly!.
These are highly contradictory versions and indicate someone is not telling
the truth.
-
- CONCLUSION: Whenever multiple agency of government join
together in a massive cover-up of this nature, it always points to a broad
conspiracy involving media, federal agencies, local police, and judges.
Naturally it can't be controlled except from the power base of the federal
government. Choosing Colorado for an operation like this was no accident.
I have detailed before some of the evidence that the Denver area is heavily
controlled by multiple black operations of government. The CIA owns and
controls banks, airlines, S&Ls, Real estate companies and lawyers.
It also has a black helicopter operation working out of the old Buckley
Auxiliary airfield. In addition' there is highly surpressed evidence of
a huge secret underground facility within the new Denver International
Airport--which many supect was the real cause of the massive cost overruns
and delays experienced in construction. Worst of all, the government controls
many federal and state judges in Colorado and particularly in the Denver
district. It was no accident that the Tim McVeigh trial was moved to Denver.
-
- My take on Columbine is that, much like the OKC bombing,
this was a dark side operation to accelerate an evil political agenda.
The Murrah building was bombed in concert with undiscovered agent provocateurs
(John Doe #1 and 2) to help the media spin this as an act of terrorism
by anti-government conservatives. Columbine's purpose was to engender a
massive outpouring of propaganda for and in behalf of gun control. Both
have been only partially successful. Sadly' this doesn't mean they will
give up, only that the carnage is not yet concluded.
-
- Correction and additional information
-
- FrASom Joel Skousen <jwqw
-
- To World Affairs Brief list:
-
- Part of my report on Columbine had an unclear reference
to the Brown brothers. In the following text, "Brooks" is the
name of the elder Brown brother. Also see the important link below.
-
- "Two of the participants in the pre-enactment video
were the Brown brothers, who were at Columbine during the shooting, and
who knew Klebold and Harris. John Quinn pointed out something suspicious
in the Brown brother,s testimony about their involvement during the massacre.
Quinn said, "It had previously been reported that Brook,s older brother
was inside the building and this fact was known by the elder Brooks when
he claims he was warned away from the school by Harris. Brooks uses this
alibi to shore up his case that he would never have been involved in any
way with the massacre. Another testified that Brook,s brother was on
the stairway and was fired at directly by Harris but not hit. What's
interesting however is that in their appearance on Oprah Winfrey's show
on May 20, 1999, it is the older Brown boy who said he was in the cafeteria
when the shooting broke out and he never saw either Harris or Klebold directly!.
These are highly contradictory versions and indicate someone is not telling
the truth"
-
- Also for some fascinating additional backup info, go
to the following site:
-
- http://columbine.home.dhs.org/.S
-
- SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE
http://www.sightings.com
- This
Site Served by TheHostPros
|