- Note - The following is an excerpt of Mr. Lamprecht's
forthcoming book on the terror and tribulations of South Africa entitled
'Government By Deception.' Posted by special permission of Mr. Lamprecht.
May not be reposted all or in part without written permission of the author.
-
-
- One of the best-kept secrets of Africa is the cruelty
shown by black Marxists towards those whom they were supposedly trying
to liberate.
-
- The decolonisation of Africa was not a pretty process.
The British on the one hand washed their hands of Africa as quickly as
they possibly could. They showed little interest in handing their colonies
over to the best black people and did their utmost to absolve themselves
of responsibility for Africa. Instead, any pretender to the throne was
good enough. The irresponsible, power-hungry Marxist liberators loved this
approach. It suited them down to the ground. Now they could waltz in and
pretend to be the "voice of the people. Whites of course were completely
aghast by this. African colonies, like Rhodesia for example, were very
efficiently run. A country like South Africa for example had annual growths
in GDP second only to that of Japan. All the colonies were developing quickly
and showing great promise. Into this stepped nobodies who had no experience
of government and who only knew Marxism-Leninism. The whites were completely
opposed to a hand over to such people whom we believed would destroy the
countries. Whites argued that these people had no real interest in uplifting
the blacks and that the blacks would actually be worse off under their
rule. They said, >from the start, that the pretenders were only after
power and that they had literally nothing positive to contribute to the
long-term development of the country. This is how the friction developed
which led to the liberation wars in Zimbabwe, Nambia and South Africa.
-
- The Marxist pretenders wanted complete power, immediately.
The whites opposed this irresponsible behaviour. It should be said that
once the communists started financing wars, the whites began a process
of inclusion, and of finding the most suitable black people to hand over
to. This happened in both Zimbabwe and South Africa. In both cases, there
were suitable anti-Communists whom we wanted to hand over to which we believed
could rule the country successfully. Bishop Muzorewa won a free and fair
election and became the first black ruler of Zimbabwe/Rhodesia (as it was
called for a time). But the Marxists did not like this and continued a
war against him until they won. Similarly, in South Africa, Buthelezi seemed
to be the most promising pro-Western man. But the ANC was quick to attack
him and fight bitterly against him so that he could never gain the support
of the majority of blacks.
-
- It is worth noting the attitude of the blacks themselves,
the masses in whose name all this was being done. The race relations between
blacks and whites in the colonial days were far better than now. It is
true there was racism and true that there was a certain amount of unhappiness,
but it was nothing like the problems of today. There is a popular mythology
which has been spread around the world by communist propagandists which
creates the impression that black people were so frustrated that they were
ready to "storm the Bastille in order to remove themselves >from
the yoke of colonialism. This is not true, especially among the older blacks.
The communists got most of their support from the impressionable youth.
But, the darkest secret of all, is that in order to win the blacks to their
side, the Marxist Liberators had to use extreme forms of violence. Terror
was the tactic. The terror was gruesome and hideous. We whites were extremely
outraged by terror and we saw these Marxist pretenders as being nothing
more than terrorists who would stoop to any level of murder, torture or
lying in order to come to power. Often, people in the rest of the world
were amazed at why, a mere 250,000 whites in Rhodesia held out so bitterly
against the likes of Mugabe and Nkomo. But that was because we believed
them to be the embodiment of evil. If they were the voice of the people,
then why did the people not flock to them? If they were the saviours of
the black masses, then why did they have to beat and murder black people
and terrorise them into subjugation in order to win their support? If the
black people were so keen to get rid of white rule then why did six million
blacks not swamp 250,000 whites and murder us all? They outnumbered us
twenty to one. They could have killed us with spears and pangas if they
hated us so much. But they didn,t. Why? The truth is, many blacks were
not too keen on the liberators themselves. So the liberators had to conduct
an "ethnic cleansing, or to be more accurate, a purging of the blacks.
Anyone who opposed their Marxist Leninist nonsense had to dealt with. Any
black man who was friendly to whites or a supporter of the whites had to
be murdered or intimidated. Black policemen and black soldiers and their
families were attacked. What is hardly ever mentioned is that in both Rhodesia
and South Africa, one found thousands of black men who were either Policemen
or who fought in our armies. Right to the end, there were blacks fighting
to keep the whites in power. There were blacks who were not impressed with
the Marxist pretenders or their methods. Some of the finest troops in the
Rhodesian and South African armies were blacks who were opposed to communism.
The deadly Selous Scouts for example, were composed mostly of blacks in
a counter terrorist role. In South Africa, 32 battalion consisted of blacks
and Portuguese who were opposed to Marxists.
-
- The Liberators considered anyone who co-operated with
the whites to be a "sell-out or a traitor. They used sheer terror
to prevent blacks from being friendly towards the whites. Any moderate
black, who co-operated with the whites, was in danger of being beaten,
or, worse still, murdered in the most brutal fashion imaginable. The Liberators
were not nice, kind, democratic people. They were people who were hungry
for power and who used any means to get it. They killed black and white
civilians alike in a reign of terror in order to get their way.
-
- It is worth describing shortly, their basic approach.
In Zimbabwe, the war was fought in the rural areas, often far away from
civilisation. A gang of guerrillas would approach a village and gather
together all the people who maybe numbered several hundred. They would
try to convince the villagers to support them. They would even teach them
politically orientated songs. They would indoctrinate them with Marxist
ideology. But then they would warn them of what would happen to a sell-out.
They would then pick a man from the audience, to demonstrate to the villagers
what they would do to someone who co-operated with the whites. They might
pick a man and then start beating him while forcing the villagers to watch.
On some occasions they would begin cutting off flesh from his living body.
A favourite target was to cut a man,s ears off, or cut his lips off. They
might cut his lips off with a knife or a bayonet or even rip them off with
pliers. Then they would call his wife and ask her to cook her husband,s
flesh. Then they would make her eat it. All this would be done in full
view of the horrified villagers. They would beat the man, torture him some
more and finally bayonet him to death. This, they would declare, is what
will happen to anyone who co-operates with the whites.
-
- In South Africa a similar tactic was practised in order
to terrify all the blacks into submission. Winnie Mandela,s infamous statement
about freeing South Africa with boxes of matches is all about killing blacks
who opposed the ANC and who worked with the whites. The ANC wanted a method
of killing people, which would terrorise all black opposition to them into
submission. So they invented the infamous "necklace. They dreamed
up the idea of putting a tyre around a person,s neck ("necklace) and
filling it with petrol, which would be set alight. The person would thus
burn to death. But, it was not as simple as that. The person would often
be beaten, stoned, set alight and maybe, in the end stabbed to ensure that
they were dead. This is the dreadful terror which Winnie Mandela and the
rest of the ANC are so proud of. For all the errors of the whites, where
did one find such methods of terror being used by whites against blacks
in any of the colonies? The truth is, whites never resorted to such horrific
means. Many people outside South Africa may remember seeing film footage
of black people being killed in such a dreadful manner. Hundreds were killed
by the ANC like this and yet nobody speaks out against them. All those
people who died in such a horrible manner were enemies of the ANC.
-
- How then can the ANC in South Africa, or ZANU in Zimbabwe
stand up and claim to be democratic? How can they claim to be the voice
of the black people? They had to murder and beat blacks into submission
who did not want to go along with their plans. Most of the liberation wars
consisted not of attacks on whites, but attacks on blacks. They spent most
of their time working on the minds of the black people either with their
seductive lies or by beating them and terrorising them into submission.
Virtual civil wars raged in black townships or in the province of KwaZulu/Natal.
The liberators spent more time killing other black people than killing
whites. For every one white person who died, maybe thirty or more black
people were killed. The whites knew this and they armed blacks wherever
they could. In Zimbabwe protected villages were set up. In South Africa
various self-defence units were formed. It is however hard to combat terror
if one does not resort to terror oneself. Since we never used terror as
a tactic we were at a disadvantage.
-
- The people who won the liberation wars did not do so
on a wave of popular support from oppressed blacks. They spent years playing
a propaganda and psychological warfare game. They used persuasion in all
its forms, starting with mere lies and graduating onwards to outright torture
and murder.
-
- As Mwezi Twala told me, the communist view is that one
must fight using all means. There is no such thing as right or wrong. Any
tactic and method used in order to win is right. The ANC has stated this
openly. It has said any method used to bring down Apartheid was correct.
But, the same applies to Zimbabwe, Namibia and other southern African countries.
It was not just South Africa where terror was employed. Terror was used
everywhere.
-
- One should therefore call into question the right of
communists to claim that they are the voice of the black people. In my
opinion they are not. They no longer cut people,s body parts off, nor do
they set them alight, but they still use force when it,s needed. They are
not averse to murdering blacks who oppose them. The ANC has not ruled South
Africa for long enough for us to see them using force to put the blacks
in their place, but that day may yet come. In Zimbabwe, in 2000, Mugabe
sent thugs into villages to beat up those who supported his democratic
opposition. Others were sent to "re-education camps (a nice old Soviet
phrase!) In the 1980,s the Matabele tribe in southern Zimbabwe expressed
its dissatisfaction with Mugabe. He responded by engaging in genocide.
He sent the North Korean-trained 5th Brigade in to beat, torture and murder
black people. He killed approximately 2,000 people. Entire villages were
wiped out and people were thrown down wells. Not a peep was heard out of
the rest of the world. Imagine if the whites had done such a thing? The
world would have declared war on us and bombed us into submission. But,
a black communist can do it and hardly anyone takes notice. Such are the
double standards the world applies to us in Africa. The white man is measured
by one yardstick and the black man by another. Everyone wants equality
and fairness, but if that were so, then one would hope that murder by a
black man is the same as murder by a white man. Murder by a white man must
not be seen as being more evil than murder by a black man. Murder is murder
and evil is evil. Whites never committed such heinous crimes, but the black
communists could cut people up, black and white alike, kick babies around
like footballs until they die, hamstring men before killing them or rape
and kill women and nobody says a thing. This is the big, deep, dark secret
of the rulers of southern Africa today. The same people who wear suits
and drink champagne and are lauded across the world are the same men who
once ordered their followers to put Portuguese people on sawmills or who
planted landmines to blow up white and black civilians alike. Life to them
was cheap back then and it still is.
-
- How can these people claim to love their own people and
watch out for their welfare when they indulged in cruelty beyond imagination
against their own people? These hard and harsh people do not care for their
own kind. They care only for themselves. They kill black people even more
easily and readily than they kill whites. But they preach human rights
and refuse to hang murderers. They cannot tell right from wrong, nor are
they interested in it. They rose to power by terrorising innocent people.
Now that they are in power they protect drug dealers and murderers. These
people, from the first, never cared for right or wrong. They never cared
for blacks and they find whites a nuisance.
-
- We whites may have committed crimes and done many wrongs
including keeping black people down, but our crimes are far less than theirs.
We have also, in the final analysis learned from our mistakes and most
of us regret that we did not change our ways more willingly or earlier.
But the communists who are in power see no wrong in anything they did.
They are bereft of conscience. This is part of the training they got from
the Russians and others. Everything they do in the pursuit of power is
correct. They never do wrong. These moral degenerates now run countries
live like multimillionaires and smile in front of cameras. But their hands
are covered in the blood of the black people they murdered to get there.
-
-
-
- MainPage
http://www.rense.com
-
-
-
- This
Site Served by TheHostPros
|