Rense.com

 
TB's Troubling Comeback
By Hans S. Nichols
hnichols@InsightMag.com
Insight Magazine
9-5-1

As drugs to treat tuberculosis became more effective, the disease grew more resistant, leading to a deadly new strain that is riding increases in immigration and travel.
 
The war year of 1944 was an important one in the fight against tuberculosis (TB). Up to that time a TB diagnosis usually meant a long stay in one of the country's more than 600 sanitariums. Or death. But with the discovery of streptomycin, treating TB became a matter of taking a regimen of pills. By the early 1970s new cases of the disease were an oddity among native-born Americans. Indeed the medical community predicted the disease would be eradicated in the United States by 2000.
       Then in the mid-1980s, with the epidemic of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) weakening immune systems, TB made a comeback. The medical community redoubled its efforts and, by 1992, the numbers were on the decline. When the next surge of TB comes, will modern medicine be as successful?
 
       While there's still a 95 percent treatment rate, as the drugs to treat TB became more readily available the disease has grown more resistant. Fifty years after medicines were created to cure TB, the bacteria has learned to fight back against such drugs as isoniazid and rifampin. Tuberculosis mutated into a new strain, called multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB).
 
       This new strain is as deadly as it is untreatable, according to a recent study published in Chest, the peer-reviewed journal of the American College of Chest Physicians. In a controlled study of patients with MDR-TB, 32 percent died even though they received intense medical attention. "We have a potentially disastrous public-health problem if we don't get serious about treatment," says physician and coauthor of the study, David Ashkin of the A.G. Holley State Tuberculosis Hospital in Lantana, Fla.
       How are patients contracting MDR-TB? More than 53 percent in the study "acquired" the disease "through a combination of inadequate professional care and unpredictable patient behavior," says John Sbarbaro, a professor at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. When the regimen of drugs is not completed by the patient, TB can mutate into MDR-TB. While many patients simply stop taking their medicine before the required six-month regimen is completed, others are victims of bad medicine and/or bogus pills. In some developing nations, the supposed medicine is nothing more than a sugar pill. And in some places the full complement of drugs is not always available. The result is the same: a more virulent disease is born.
       Worse, the drug regimen for treating the mutated MDR-TB takes anywhere from 18 to 24 months and includes toxic drugs with debilitating side effects. In some parts of the world up to 14 percent of new TB cases are MDR, notes Mario C. Raviglione of the World Health Organization (WHO) in Switzerland. "If anything, we are losing the battle worldwide," Sbarbaro says.
 
       The other 47 percent of MDR patients in the Chest study acquired the mutated strain the old-fashioned way. That is, they inhaled the pulmonary disease, sharing air with someone who already was infected. According to Sbarbaro, this demonstrates that "the old belief that drug-resistant organisms are not as contagious as fully sensitive tubercle bacilli was, and is, wrong."
       Not that the traditional TB isn't deadly enough. On average it claims more than 2 million lives a year worldwide, according to the WHO. Nearly 70 percent of those with active TB will die of it if untreated; for those who also have HIV, the numbers are even higher.
       While TB outbreaks usually occur in damp, sunless environments such as prisons and refugee camps, there are documented cases of the bacteria being transmitted on trans-Atlantic flights. Typically, someone has to breathe the uncirculated air of an infected person for anywhere from six to eight hours for transmission to occur, TB researchers estimate.
 
       Since transmission occurs fairly regularly, more than one-third of the world population has TB. But there's a difference between being infected with TB and having "active TB," public-health officials caution, because 90 to 95 percent of the people infected with TB don't develop the full-blown disease.
       Treating any contagious disease can turn into a privacy debate because the rights of the individual come into conflict with the health of the community, says physician Martin Siegel of the Swedish Hospital Medical Center in Seattle. In addition to these concerns, there's the potential to politicize the issue because many of the high-risk groups are immigrant populations. "But public-health officials don't think like that," Siegel adds. They are concerned with "what's the best way to treat the patient and also address the public-health concerns."
       For diseases such as TB, all 50 states have public-health ordinances requiring even unwilling patients to get treatment. But these ordinances only apply to those who have been diagnosed, and many TB carriers, especially undocumented aliens, are hesitant to seek proper medical attention. When a carrier moves to another state, Sbarbaro says, "there's no way to track them."
 
       One of the problems with treating TB is that "as soon as you start to feel good, you stop taking your drugs," Sbarbaro explains. Since the cure rate is higher significantly for inpatient treatment, public-health experts such as Sbarbaro argue that we need to consider the possibility of "chemical isolation" - code for confining these patients in sanitariums. "Once MDR-TB is detected, it is crucial to recognize that every physician becomes a public-health official," he wrote in a Chest editorial.
       One possible solution is to stop TB at the U.S. border with tighter immigration standards. In 1999, 43 percent of active TB cases in the United States were among the foreign-born, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But many experts in the public-health community argue that keeping TB from crossing the border is as impossible as stopping illegal immigration.
       Under the Immigration and Nationality Act any alien who is determined "to have a communicable disease of public-health significance" is to be prohibited from entering the country. For immigrants seeking permanent residence in the United States, a doctor's checkup is required before a visa is approved. If an applicant is diagnosed with a communicable disease such as TB or HIV, the applicant is supposed to be disqualified from entry.
       But there have been allegations that some "panel-approved physicians" can be bribed or persuaded to issue clean bills of health for sick applicants, Sbarbaro says. In response to this corruption, some panel-approved physicians have been decertified, but an official at the U.S. Bureau of Consular Affairs tells Insight that no one knows how widespread the problem is.
       Absent a clean bill of health a prospective immigrant is denied entrance unless the U.S. attorney general provides a waiver. In the past, such waivers have been granted for international HIV conferences, the Gay Games and to accommodate particular groups of political refugees.
       While the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) requires a doctor's approval of applicants for permanent status, the 22 million foreign visitors to the United States each year are trusted to report their medical histories accurately on their visa paperwork.
       In addition, the millions of Americans who travel abroad are not screened upon re-entry, leading many public-health officials to conclude that the best way to treat TB in the United States is to treat it worldwide. "We are not isolated. We are not an island," Sbarbaro reminds Insight.
       Worldwide, there were an estimated 8.4 million new tuberculosis cases in 1999, up from 8 million in 1997, according to the WHO 2001 Report on Global Tuberculosis Control. While India and China rank atop the list of countries with traditional TB problems, Eastern Europe and the former Soviet satellite states now have the highest incidences of MDR.
       Treating the problem may not be as easy as flooding the world with cheap TB drugs. "We are against parachuting drugs into countries that do not have the systems to handle them," says the WHO's Raviglione. While the cost of first-line drugs is as low as $7 for a six-month treatment, even second-line drugs for MDR cost $10,000 to $15,000. Through an arrangement with the WHO and pharmaceutical companies there's now a plan to get drugs into countries at discounted prices.
       But these discounted drugs are only made available to countries that prove they can distribute and administer them responsibly. "We are telling some countries that they are not ready," Raviglione explains. "Tragically, doctors in these countries either have to watch their patients die or watch them live and pass on the chronic disease to others. But there's no other way" to stop the global spread of MDR.
       While there still are many political concerns about committing patients to TB specialty centers, scientific evidence suggests that full-time care is the most effective way to eradicate the disease. Sbarbaro points out, "Forty-five percent of patients who received care in community-care settings died versus 18 percent of patients who received care in the inpatient-treatment facility."
       As for MDR, if we don't treat it soon, Raviglione says, "We are bound to fail, and that could be disastrous."
 

MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros