Rense.com



Afghanistan - Graveyard Of
Foreign Invaders
9-30-1

ISLAMABAD (AFP) - Lieutenant general G.N. Molesworth, of the British army in India in 1919, was scanning the village below for signs of the antique Afghan cannon which was beginning to find its range on his position.
 
To his flank, he was worried about a band of armed Pashtun tribesmen, sympathetic to the Afghan regular forces and threatening a guerrilla raid against his nervous, underequipped group of British and Indian units.
 
It was one of the first encounters of the so-called third Afghan war against the British, and despite the bitter lessons of the two earlier wars in the 1840s and 1870s, it seemed the imperial army had again underestimated the Afghan fighting spirit.
 
"Hardly had they started to observe the Afghan position, when the Afghan gun scored a direct hit just below the 'sangar' (sandbagged ditch) and showered the occupants with stones. It was a very near miss," Molesworth wrote in his 1962 memoir of the war.
 
"In the meantime, binoculars had been searching for the gun which was very difficult to locate. Eventually it was spotted near the old fort on Kafir Kot, where the gunners were seen to run it out of a cave, fire it and run it back again."
 
More conspicuously, the Afghans were also using an almost obselete machine gun to rake the British positions overlooking the Afghan entrenchments around Bagh village in the Khyber Pass, in what is now Pakistan.
 
"The range was much too long for it to do any damage, but its solemn rate of fire and the cloud of smoke it made caused much merriment among the troops," Molesworth said.
 
Once spotted, both weapons were silenced with three well-directed salvos of from a British battery, but the Afghans had made their point. Despite their inferiority in arms and training, they could hold their own with the most powerful army of the day.
 
The brigade commander, fearing a surprise attack on another section of the front, had kept too much in reserve, wrote Molesworth.
 
"In other words, he sent a child to do a man's job. He may also have underestimated the Afghan numbers, the strength of their position, their fighting qualities and the difficulties of the ground over which the attack would have to pass."
 
Seventy years later, the same words could have been written by Red Army commanders as the Soviet forces pulled out of Afghanistan after a disastrous 10-year occupation.
 
"The Soviet Union's example shows that Afghanistan is an impregnable fortress," Yevgeny Zelenov, Russian lawmaker and veteran of the wars in Afghanistan, told AFP last week.
 
The Soviets withdrew in 1989, cementing Afghanistan's reputation as a graveyard for invading armies. But it is really a graveyard for the Afghans who have fought for their independence, most often against each other.
 
The country is dotted with the litter of past battles, going back centuries, against powers such as Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan and Tamerlane.
 
The remains of bombed out Soviet tanks and armoured vehicles scatter the countryside, and whole villages lie in ruins, their surrounding farmland sowed with mines and their irrigation canals deliberately destroyed.
 
More than a million Afghans are believed to have died during the "holy war" against the Soviets, along with some 14,000 Red Army killed and 50,000 wounded. It has been called the Soviet Union's Vietnam.
 
Some three million Afghans, including the best and brightest of the country, fled the fighting to form the larest refugee population in the world.
 
And as the United States contemplates becoming the latest superpower to try to impose its will on the Afghans, a million more are reportedly ready to flee.
 
US forces are already believed to be in place around the deeply impoverished country of 21 million people. Some are said to be using old Soviet bases in Uzbekistan to the north.
 
US President George W. Bush says his military planners have learned from the Soviet Union's debacle in Afghanistan.
 
"I am fully aware of the difficulties the Russians had in Afghanistan. Our intelligence people and our State Department people are also fully aware," Bush said last week, as he drummed up international support for his "war" against terrorism.
 
"It is very hard to fight a guerrilla war with conventional forces," said the US president, who told reporters the coming US-led campaign against terrorism would be "fought on a variety of fronts," financial, diplomatic and military.
 
"There have been lessons learned in the past, and our government is very aware of those lessons."
 
Afghanistan's current rulers, the Taliban Islamic militia, have been testing their Soviet-era anti-aircraft guns in preparation for a US attack. Their lessons have already been learnt.

 
 
 
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
 
 
 
This Site Served by TheHostPros