Rense.com



US/UK Cloak Afghan Campaign In
Secrecy - With Help From Taliban
By Giles Elgood
10-12-1

LONDON (Reuters) - Washington and London are keen to cloak the details of their war against terrorism in secrecy, but key aspects of the campaign could be forced into the open if Afghanistan's rulers start using the media to their advantage.
 
Military analysts believe that if the ruling Taliban allow international news teams to report on the bombing of their country, the allies will have to explain themselves more fully.
 
U.S. and British defense chiefs have gone out of their way to tell news organizations that they will be clamping down on information during the campaign aimed at rooting out Saudi-born militant Osama bin Laden, who is hiding in Afghanistan.
 
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has given repeated warnings since last month's attacks on the United States that anyone who discusses classified information about military plans is breaking the law and risking the lives of service personnel.
 
Admiral Sir Michael Boyce, Britain's Chief of the Defense Staff, put it more enigmatically, telling reporters: ``Sometimes you will know, sometimes you won't, about what is going on.''
 
Before the U.S.-British air attacks even began last Sunday, Britain's defense ministry summoned national editors to voice fears that newspaper speculation about what sort of military campaign was being plotted might inadvertently aid the enemy.
 
One British expert familiar with U.S. defense matters said: ''Rumsfeld has threatened the defense industry with excommunication if they let a word out about what is happening in Afghanistan. We are all going to be fumbling in the dark for a very long time.''
 
Chris Aaron, editor of the authoritative Jane's Intelligence Review, said that for the military, information was an ever more vital tool of war.
 
``The military is trained in media management and it is obviously an issue that they take seriously in terms of prosecuting the war,'' he told Reuters.
 
MILITARY BRIEFERS
 
So far, the main sources of information about the U.S.-led bombing raids are the military briefers. Veteran correspondents say they are being less forthcoming about targets and battle damage than during the 1999 Kosovo campaign or 1991 Gulf War.
 
And in the absence of independent reports from the ground in Afghanistan, there is nothing to challenge aerial photographs showing damage to Taliban military facilities by bombs said to have been dropped with pinpoint accuracy.
 
``When Donald Rumsfeld...declares himself satisfied with the accuracy of the attacks, who can contradict him?'' asked Britain's Guardian newspaper.
 
This information strategy is currently being aided by the Taliban's policy of banning foreign news teams from Afghanistan, military analysts believe.
 
Challenged about accusations from Afghan sources that allied bombs had killed civilians, British Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon was able to say quite truthfully that he had no independent verification of the reports.
 
But if the Taliban allow international media to produce their own pictures, the allies will have to respond.
 
The removal of foreign aid workers from Afghanistan deprives the media of one key source of information about civilians.
 
Unlike the Serbs, who during the Kosovo campaign were quick to invite foreign news teams to film the ``collateral damage'' caused when allied bombs killed civilians, the Taliban have yet to harness the full power of television.
 
Television is banned in Afghanistan and the country's 20 million people never saw the two hijacked airliners smash into New York's World Trade Center on September 11.
 
``They don't really understand the power of television,'' one analyst said.
 
So far, bin Laden has issued only a small number of videotaped statements through the Qatar-based al Jazeera Arab satellite news network.
 
By this means, he avoided any uncomfortable questions from journalists and showed a knack for manipulating the media.
 
The Americans do not want to be outdone on managing the message -- a priority since they lost media backing in the Vietnam War.
 
As bin Laden's message was replayed on networks around the world, the administration urged broadcasters to exercise restraint, saying it might contain coded messages inciting followers to further attacks on America.

 
 
 
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
 
 
 
This Site Served by TheHostPros