Rense.com



Remote-Control Warplanes May
Be Future Of Aerial Warfare
By Ian Bruce
The Herald
10-15-1

A generation of children raised on shoot-em-up computer games are set to become the fighter aces of the future when a flat screen, keyboard, and mouse will replace joysticks, firing buttons and the illusory chivalry of one-on-one aerial combat.
 
The Boeing corporation is planning to edge Biggles out of the cockpit with a remotely-controlled jet whose mission will be to destroy enemy defences without risking the life of a single pilot.
 
Final flight tests of the US version of the £90m prototype programme aircraft are scheduled for December. If successful, they could be deployed over Afghanistan on seek-and-destroy missions by next spring.
 
The experimental X45A may lack the romance of the Spitfire or the F16 Fighting Falcon, but it will be able to perform high-speed manoeuvres which the human body could not stand without losing consciousness or suffering fatal internal injuries.
 
The aircraft, designed at Boeing's top secret "skunk works" in Burbank, California, has a bat wing design incorporating the latest stealth technology. Its fuselage is made of graphite epoxy composite materials over an aluminium frame.
 
Because it has no need of a cockpit, ejector seat or any other of the life-support gadgets necessary for a manned jet, it retails for a third as much as a conventional warplane at about £7m and is 75% cheaper to operate.
 
It costs the RAF between £2m and £3m to train a front-line pilot, and tens of thousands of pounds annually to keep his skills honed in practice flights and simulators. The United States spends £700m annually simply to keep its 2000 F16 pilots in fighting trim.
 
An entire squadron of 12 X45As can be dismantled, crated, and flown to a combat zone inside a single C5 transport aircraft. They can be reassembled and ready for action in a matter of hours.
 
Preliminary tests show that it is possible for a single operator to handle four of the unmanned vehicles at a time via two flat-screen monitors. One displays a map of the target area, much like that of a PC war game, and the other shows the view from the X45A's own camera and other sensors. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been used since the 1970s as reconnaissance drones. The real impetus to turn them from eyes in the sky to strike weapons came from the indifferent bombing results in the Kosovo war of 1999.
 
Terrified of the political impact of losing aircrew to Serb anti-aircraft missiles and flak guns, the Americans insisted that bombing missions should be conducted from 15,000ft. This reduced the accuracy of attacks to the tragic point where pilots could not differentiate between enemy armoured columns and fleeing refugees. Despite Nato claims that the Serb war machine had been seriously damaged, inspectors entering the province in the aftermath of the 78-day onslaught could find evidence of just 13 knocked-out tanks.
 
Even the RAF, which had trained for 30 years to carry out low-level strikes against the now defunct Soviet menace, was forced to adhere to the medium-level strategy. The British attitude was also slightly coloured by the fact that six Tornado fighter-bombers had been shot down by Iraqi guns and missiles during the early phase of the Gulf war in 1991. The new unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) has the potential to solve the problem at a fraction of the cost. If successful, UCAVs would be used to loiter over enemy-controlled territory, pinpoint missile sites and gun emplacements, and destroy them with bombs or homing missiles.
 
Supporters of manned warplanes insist the same job can be done using cruise missiles. To some extent, that is true. But Tomahawks cost £750,000 apiece and are one-shot weapons. UCAVs can be retrieved and used again.
 
Link

 
 
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
 
 
 
This Site Served by TheHostPros