Rense.com



Would bin Laden Have
Used The Word 'Iron'?
From American Patriot Friends Network
APFN@apfn.org
From Ralph
cccc1@concentric.net
12-18-1

My thoughts on this video hang on a word: "Iron." Bid Ladin's daddy owned a large construction firm. Osama worked for him for a few years. He knows that buildings aren't built with "iron." The proper term is "steel." There are some folks, older Americans mostly, who call these structural members "iron." But that term, when applied to building members, is bordering on obsolescence. Bin Ladin just isn't old enough to have learned the wrong word.
 
At first I thought it might have lost something in translation. Then I realized that the arabs pretty much invented steel, and that the term "Damascus" still describes a forging process for steel. I'm pretty sure that they'd have a word for "steel," just as we do, and that it should have come out in translation. It didn't.
 
There's something funny going on here. A construction man his age just wouldn't call it "iron." Maybe the translators screwed it up, mistranslating the term into "iron" instead of "steel." But then what would that say of their abilities regarding everything else stated? If bin Ladin were truely the "mastermind" behind the attack, he'd have said things far more "technical" than he did, regarding the plastic (deformation) points of steel under fire. He'd have calculated them. Nor do I think that a construction man would have expressed surprise at the total collapse of the structures.
 
Anybody else notice that he didn't have a word to say about the Pentagon; he said nothing about the plane that crashed in Penna. Gee, I'd bet those are classified subjects, tho. So, Osama didn't mention them . . . How nice that he spoke only to subjects that wouldn't violate the national security, eh? Nice? Naaaaaw - it's quite patriotic!
 
 
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
 
 
 
This Site Served by TheHostPros