- One example may be sufficient to show
how difficult and important the struggle against terrorism is: Even if
the FBI finds the anthrax-by-mail terrorist(s) tomorrow, the fact will
remain that the bioterrorit(s) in question was/were at large for about
four months.
-
- Hundreds of thousands or millions of
Americans could be killed in four months by really up-to-date large-scale
bioterrorists stealing a five-pound bag of that same antiquated anthrax,
to say nothing of later and far more potent and effective "biopreparations."
-
- A far easier way was to personify the
terrorism as Osama bin Laden, with his al-Qaeda, and rush in hot pursuit
of the villain who "planned and carried out" (as Prime Minister
Tony Blair put it) the terrorist attack on the United States of Sept. 11,
2001.
-
- But who is bin Laden? Why did the CIA
choose this feeble-minded nonentity in the 1980s to create the Services
Office for the recruitment of guerrilla soldiers in 50 countries for the
war against the secular pro-Soviet government in Afghanistan?
-
- He had inherited $300 million, and hence
the CIA was able to funnel $5 billion through him, which he could pass
off as his own money and thus leave the CIA behind the scenes. Officially,
the United States did not participate in the war.
-
- In 1978, the per capita income in Afghanistan
was $168 a year. In other words, $1,000 a year was a fortune. For $300
million, "bin Laden" (that is, the CIA) could recruit 30,000
guerrilla soldiers to serve for 10 years for $1,000 a year per recruit.
-
- A guerrilla soldier learned in a training
camp how to ambush Soviet and pro-Soviet soldiers, fire a Kalashnikov at
them, and flee to his "base" in the mountains or caves. Most
of the 30,000 guerrilla soldiers survived the war and were far better off
materially in Islamic countries like Afghanistan than the average-income
person, to say nothing of those who were starving.
-
- The CIA no longer needed guerrilla soldiers,
so bin Laden inherited them.
-
-
- In print and on Barry Farber's radio
talk show in the late 1980s, I explained that Soviet Russia securely held
Afghanistan. Not because of "tactical nuclear weapons," discussed
by the U.S. government following Sept. 11, 2001, but by creating a single
infrastructure so that finally the guerrillas would starve and die out
in their mountains and caves, a strategy by which Russia had conquered
the Islamic Caucasus in the 19th century.
-
- Why, then, did Gorbachev withdraw from
Afghanistan? For the same reason he withdrew from East Germany and many
other territories, for which he was made a Nobel Peace Prize laureate.
-
- Until 1992, the Western public did not
know that Gorbachev was developing Superweapon No. 3. He withdrew from
Afghanistan and East Germany because he believed in world domination via
Superweapon No. 3, not via old-fashioned territorial expansion.
-
- But Gorbachev's geostrategic withdrawal
from Afghanistan was perceived by the West (and the Islamic world) as a
Soviet rout. This imaginary Soviet debacle transformed the nonentity bin
Laden, the CIA's financial screen, into a megalomaniac - a new Muhammad
who had rallied Moslems in 50 countries and defeated Soviet Russia with
the help of his (the CIA's) Services Office.
-
- Now, if he had defeated Soviet Russia,
he could certainly defeat the United States, too. He had hated the secular
pro-Soviet government in Afghanistan because it had introduced universal
school education that included girls. He hated the United States even
more: The American permissiveness with respect to females was even worse
than the Soviet indulgence, and American troops were on the sacred soil
of Saudi Arabia!
-
- So, in the late 1980s, he renamed the
Services Office, created by the CIA in 50 countries, as The Base (al-Qaeda)
to fight "the Jews and the Crusaders" (that is, Christians).
But the feeble-minded megalomaniac did not take into account the cardinal
difference between a guerrilla soldier and a terrorist.
-
- Millions, or dozens of millions, of Moslems
would find it quite attractive to be guerrilla soldiers in a war for $1,000
a year and live happily after the war. But all terrorism is mortally dangerous,
for a terrorist in New York or Washington cannot flee into the mountains
or caves of Afghanistan. He is in the position of the most dangerous and
most wanted criminal in a foreign country.
-
- Besides, the most effective terrorism
is suicidal, and there is a psychological chasm between a guerrilla soldier
surviving a guerrilla war and a "martyr" who sacrifices his life.
Bin Laden could, in October and November of 2001, have attacked his
enemies in Afghanistan and died in a terrorist act. But so far he has
been good at fleeing and hiding, not at sacrificing his life.
-
- Was there a single terrorist in al-Qaeda?
The U.S. war on the Taliban's Afghanistan began on Oct. 7, 2001. Any
real terrorist organization would have retaliated within days, if not hours.
Indeed, bin Laden brandished his alleged nuclear and biological weapons
verbally, and the U.S. government warned that retaliation was drawing nigh.
-
- But these were bin Laden's megalomaniacal
theatricals. Where was his al-Qaeda in 50 or 68 countries when the war
in Afghanistan was on? As for al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, its members seemed
to be bad even as guerrilla fighters recruited by the CIA in the 1980s,
but they behaved just as bureaucrats do when their office is attacked:
running away or even surrendering. There was not a single case of terrorism
or of any bold counterattack.
-
- Considering the poverty in the Islamic
world, the CIA and, later, bin Laden could have hired millions or dozens
of millions of Moslems, but what were they good for besides wearing 10-cent
badges saying "Beware! I am bin Laden's suicidal terrorist"
and then fleeing, with bin Laden fleeing faster than any of them.
-
- Bin Laden actually redefined the definition
of who is a terrorist: "A terrorist, and especially a suicidal terrorist,
is a man who runs away for his dear life from his enemies faster than anyone
else."
-
- Arabs often look like Jews, since both
are Semitic. Much as bin Laden hates Jews and imagines himself to be an
Arab holy war daredevil, who defeated Soviet Russia and will defeat the
West, he looks like a 19th century Russian Jew, terrified by pogroms.
His premature senility and grave ailments do not add to his heroic holy
war self-image either.
-
- Before 1999, even those terrorist acts
that were ascribed (falsely?) to bin Laden and his al-Qaeda had been so
few and insignificant that the U.S. State Department had not included al-Qaeda
on its list of 30 (as of 1997) Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs).
-
- Before me is the State Department's 16-page
document of Oct. 31, 2001, entitled "Significant Terrorist Incidents,
1961-2001: Chronology." <1(1) In 1999, the first year the State
Department included al-Qaeda on its list of FTOs, there were 12 "significant
terrorist incidents," but not one of them was claimed by, or ascribed
to, al-Qaeda.
-
- In 2000, there were nine such "incidents,"
and in only one of them, in Yemen, "supporters [?] of Usama bin Laden
were suspected [!]." It is not clear why two terrorists could not
carry out this terrorist act on their own without the support of al-Qaeda.
A "small dinghy carrying explosives rammed the destroyer USS Cole,
killing 17 sailors." This is a humdrum terrorist act of the 19th
century.
-
- The money to buy the explosives? An
American taxi driver "without a medallion" nets $100 a day.
Characteristic is the word "supporters" above. The United
States has made bin Laden an evil world celebrity for the West and hence
a heroic world celebrity for terrorists. Quite recently, a born-and-bred
15-year-old WASP American, Charles Bishop, rammed a stolen plane into the
Bank of America building in Tampa and expressed in his suicide note his
support for bin Laden. What does this mean? Nothing, except that bin
Laden is now a household name, due to the U.S. media.
-
- Had we not known the story from the police
in detail, the U.S. media would have been likely to use that magic word
"link" and say that Bishop was "linked" to bin Laden
and al-Qaeda, from which the public would conclude that Bishop was an al-Qaeda
"operative" and that al-Qaeda had actually "planned and
carried out" Bishop's terrorist act, while Bishop was just a cog in
its wheel.
-
- In its report of Jan. 17, 2002, from
Washington on the Philippine Islamic Abu Sayyaf, which has "up to
2,000 members," the World reporter notes that "some of them"
(how many? Two percent, one percent, 0.1 percent?) "trained in Afghanistan."
<2(2)
-
- This is quite possible. Way back in
the 1980s, the CIA set up camps to train 30,000 recruits in the use of
automatic weapons for the guerrilla war. Possibly, two percent, one percent,
0.1 percent of the 2,000 terrorists of Abu Sayyaf in the Philippines are
former guerrilla fighters in Afghanistan. This is enough for the report
to conclude that Abu Sayyaf is "linked to al-Qaeda" and conjure
up once again the obsessively reiterated image of al-Qaeda "planning
and carrying out" terrorist acts in the Philippines as well.
-
- In this way, it is easy to further aggravate
the American obsession with bin Laden by assuring the public that his al-Qaeda
has been "planning and carrying out" all terrorist acts in the
world, from the Sept. 11, 2001, attack to Bishop's ramming of the Bank
of America, since someone or something in each terrorist act is "linked"
to bin Laden, a world celebrity.
-
- To finish the State Department's list
of "significant terrorist incidents": In 2001, before Sept.
11, there were six "incidents," and none has ever been "linked"
by anyone in any way with al-Qaeda.
-
- A bomb in a Jerusalem restaurant killed
15 Jews and wounded 90, but as usual it was claimed by Hamas, as was a
bomb in a Tel Aviv nightclub that "caused over 140 casualties."
Bin Laden had put Jews before Christians as enemies in his verbal holy
war theatricals, but not a single terrorist act in Israel has ever been
ascribed to al-Qaeda.
-
- A huge, inept bureaucracy, al-Qaeda is
not only useless for terrorism but also harmful and dangerous for it.
For example, its bureaucrats scribbled a list of those who were assigned
to bomb U.S. military ships in Singapore. The plan was megalomaniacal,
a megalomaniac's dream.
-
- As the al-Qaeda bureaucrats were fleeing
and surrendering in Afghanistan, they dropped the records and videotapes,
because he who flees the lightest, flees the fastest.
-
- The U.S. military picked up the records
and videotapes, and on Jan. 11, 2002, those listed by the al-Qaeda pen-pushers
were duly arrested in Singapore and can now be sentenced to death on the
strength of al-Qaeda bureaucrats' scribblings. <3(3)
-
- That is, the irresponsible al-Qaeda bureaucracy
has been acting not out of malice, but out of sheer bureaucratic indifference
as a collective agent provocateur, describing megalomaniacal terrorist
acts, complete with the names, and then losing the records.
-
- Useless and destructive for terrorism,
the al-Qaeda bureaucracy has nonetheless been serving bin Laden as his
giant PR exhibit, with the United States as his PR agency, sensationalizing
the PR exhibit as the last word in global terrorism the global terrorist
mastermind, "planning and carrying out" terrorist acts all over
the world, and in particular, in the United States.
-
- The American publicity, representing
the feeble-minded megalomaniac as the most dangerous villain in recorded
history, has been reflected upside down in the anti-American Islamic media,
which represents bin Laden as the new Muhammad who has conquered the United
States spiritually. The Americans have been able to think of nothing and
no one except him as their most dangerous foe they have been determined
to kill or capture at the price of a war in Afghanistan and no matter what.
-
- But sadly lacking in his global Islamic
glory (created by the United States) were great deeds military victories
in that holy war bin Laden had been talking about for more than a decade.
And here came, on Sept. 11, 2001, an event that the United States represented
as equivalent to the Second World War on American territory.
-
- Never mind that the act took place and
caused more casualties than in 1993 because of the American unpreparedness
for any hostile military activity on American soil. Surely no one nationally
visible and audible in the United States said that! Instead, Christiane
Amanpour of CNN, for example, spoke of the event as unprecedented "in
recorded history"! What a grandiose Islamic military victory worthy
of Muhammad's military victories!
-
- Yet the new Muhammad did not claim credit
for this grandiose Islamic victory. Nay, in his interview of Sept. 12,
he expressly denied any involvement in it. Of course, he hailed it. He
also said that "the majority of the dead were innocent people,"
but so also were those killed, for example, by Western aviation. He then
spoke of "hundreds of Osamas," to suggest modestly (modesty is
the best ornament of a great leader) that the United States was obsessed
with him and refused to think of hundreds of other Osamas.
-
- No nationally visible and audible American
was surprised: A criminal always lies to conceal his or her crime. No
nationally visible American seemed to understand that for most Moslems
the event, magnified by the United States to infinity, was not the most
heinous crime in recorded history, but the greatest (glorious and divine)
military victory for the new Muhammad to be proud of. Certainly he had
no fear of the United States at that time.
-
- Because of his megalomania (created by
the United States) he could not imagine the forthcoming debacle of the
Taliban and the flight (or surrender) of his al-Qaeda in November and December.
In September, the megalomaniac refused to leave Afghanistan, and the Taliban
refused to extradite him and thus avoid the war.
-
- Yes, in September, the megalomaniac still
challenged the West, the U.S. armed forces, as well as the 42 tribes hostile
to the Taliban of the Pushtun tribe. Certainly it was not fear of the
United States at that time that prompted bin Laden to expressly declare
publicly that he had nothing to do with what was to most Moslems the greatest
(glorious and divine) victory of Sept. 11, 2002, in that holy war that
he had declared on the United States. What prompted him to make such a
public statement?
-
-
- There had been a lesson for him in the
past. When President Clinton automatically accused him of a 1995 assassination
attempt in Addis Ababa against Hosni Mubarak, the Egyptian president, he
did not deny the charge. Actually, this terrorist act had been planned
for more than a year and carried out by Gama al-Islamija of Egypt, as its
members explained to Western correspondents.
-
- So bin Laden looked like a braggart,
stealing the bona fide holy warriors' deed. If he had "planned and
carried out" the terrorist attack of Sept. 11, 2001, the greatest
victorious battle in the holy war, then, as soon as the fourth airliner
crashed, he, and most of more than 1 billion Moslems as well as the anti-American
Islamic media would have screamed that the new Muhammad had at last achieved
a grandiose military victory worthy of Muhammad's victories in the 7th
century.
-
- But he had not (as we will see below)
had anything to do with that greatest victory in the holy war, and he did
not want to repeat his experience of 1995 and to hear those who had done
it and his numberless Islamic enemies branding him as a liar, a fraud and
a scoundrel, deserving to be assassinated by the bona fide terrorists in
accordance with the code of honor in the holy war.
-
- Hence, he expressly stated publicly that
he had not been involved in any way in that greatest victory in the holy
war.
-
- To justify the attack on the Taliban's
Afghanistan on Oct. 7, 2001, Prime Minster Tony Blair of England had addressed,
on Oct. 4, the House of Commons (as was shown by the American commercial
mainstream television) with a 16-page "intelligence report,"
according to which bin Laden, at the head of al-Qaeda, harbored by the
Taliban, had "planned and carried out" the epoch-making terrorist
attack.
-
- If Blair had presented any evidence showing
that bin Laden financed the attack, that might have been an impudent lie,
based on fabrications, but at least it would have been a plausible lie.
But he said nothing about any financing, while his assertion that bin
Laden "planned and carried out" from Afghanistan the attack in
the United States was an implausible lie, for no one could "plan and
carry out" from Afghanistan the training in the United States of pilots
and hijackers in the respective flight schools and sports gyms, the 19
terrorists' buying airline tickets in the United States according to the
local airline timetables, the pilots' calculations of the time to reach
all the targets simultaneously (to avoid interception), as well as the
hijacking and the ramming themselves.
-
- Blair's 16-page "intelligence report"
must have seemed implausible even to the British prime minister himself,
for more than a month later, on Nov. 14, 2001, he released a 23-page "intelligence
dossier," according to which bin Laden was the perpetrator of the
epoch-making terrorist attack of more than two months earlier because he
praised it to the skies as the "battle" that "has been moved
inside America." <4(4)
-
- Blair thus postulated that if bin Laden
had not "planned and carried out" the attack, he would have condemned
it as a crime. The American commercial mainstream television showed Blair
addressing the British Parliament, which, instead of shouting "Idiot!"
shouted "Yea!" after every other sentence Blair uttered in triumph.
-
- To think that this was the Parliament
of the nation that produced Swift, Dickens, John Stuart Mill and Orwell.
-
- Finally, on Dec. 11, 2001, the U.S. government
released a privately-made videotape (made in mid-November) on which bin
Laden lied with unrestrained megalomaniacal abandon to his several worshippers
about how he had "planned and carried out" (as Tony Blair had
put it) that terrorist act that the United States had sensationalized into
what most Moslems perceived as the greatest (divine and glorious) victory
in the holy war.
-
-
- Bin Laden's motivation was obvious.
He still did not want to take credit publicly for the greatest victory
in the holy war lest those really responsible for it and yet alive call
him, the new Muhammad, a liar, a fraud and a scoundrel, to be heard by
his foes, as numerous as his worshippers.
-
- A privately-made videotape was something
quite different. Of course, the Americans would get hold of a copy, and
the American television would give it world publicity. Well, if those
really responsible for the greatest victory in the holy war and alive challenged
his claim, he and his worshippers would say that the videotape was an American
fabrication. But if no one challenged his claim on the videotape, most
Moslems would know, owing to both American and Islamic television, that
the new Muhammad had won that greatest victory in the holy war.
-
- The videotape was hailed as the "smoking
gun" by those nationally visible and audible Americans who were obsessed
with bin Laden: The criminal told the gospel truth (what a truthful man!)
and made a clean breast of his heinous crime in the belief that never,
ever would a copy of the videotape stray beyond his trusted circle.
-
- Actually, the videotape proved beyond
reasonable doubt that bin Laden was a liar, a fraud and, in terms of the
terrorist code of honor, a scoundrel.
-
-
- Again, if he had said that he had financed
the terrorist act, by paying all the terrorists' expenses, that might have
been a lie, but at least it would have been a plausible lie. But in mid-November
nothing had been said publicly, as yet, in the United States about the
terrorists' United Arab Emirates account or about the training in American
flight schools and sports gyms, for which they paid by drawing on that
UAE account.
-
- Hence, bin Laden did not know that either,
and said nothing about the finances and the UAE account. He obviously
believed that the terrorists had not been financed from any outside source
at all, since they had not needed the money to pay for their training in
the United States: according to the videotape, there was no such training
- bin Laden did not say a word about it.
-
- On the other hand, he had certainly heard
the British prime minister's idiotic declaration that he, bin Laden, had
"planned and carried out" - in Afghanistan! - the terrorist hijacking
and ramming of three buildings in the United States, and in his feeble-minded
megalomania, bin Laden explained that this was precisely what he had been
doing in Afghanistan. Thus, "we calculated in advance the number of
casualties from the enemy, who would be killed based on the position of
the [World Trade Center] towers."
-
- Well, the "number of casualties"
depended on the general capacity of the two towers, on which floors the
airliners rammed, on whether the two towers would collapse, on the time
when they would collapse, on the number of the people still there at the
time, and on details like the flight of the elevator operators.
-
- Hence, the "number of casualties"
in the two towers could be anywhere from 300 to 50,000. After mid-November,
when the videotape was made, the number of casualties was revised repeatedly.
But bin Laden and his experts in Afghanistan had "calculated in advance
the number of casualties" by "the position [!] of the towers."
-
- At the same time, bin Laden said that
they were not sure that the towers would collapse. How did they "calculate"
the "number of casualties" if they were not even sure that the
towers would collapse? Only bin Laden himself foresaw it (and made a separate
calculation of the "number of casualties"?) because he knew that
the gasoline in the airliners would melt their steel structure.
-
- That is, bin Laden parroted what the
American "television experts" were saying in mid-November. Now,
in December, the American experts began to say in the media that the cause
of the collapse was "faulty fireproofing": on Dec. 13, the New
York Times even published (page B8) photographs of 1993 and 1994, showing
faulty fireproofing or the total absence of fireproofing already in those
years.
-
- Had bin Laden spoken in December, he
would have lied about how he foresaw faulty fireproofing as the cause of
the collapse. But he spoke in mid-November, and parroted what the American
"television experts" were saying at that time.
-
- The fact that the terrorist act of Sept.
11 germinated from a cell of college buddies at a major technological institute
in Hamburg became known only on Nov. 28, 2001, and hence bin Laden had
known nothing about it. As a result, he represented the terrorists as
strangers to one another, who "didn't know anything about the operation,
not even one letter."
-
- Bin Laden was unaware of the fact they
had been learning in the United States how to pilot airliners without taking
off or landing them, that is, to ram them, and how to hijack them by knife-fighting
and kick-boxing. His absurd megalomaniac lie was meant to represent the
19 suicidal terrorists as 19 cogs of his bureaucratic machine that he (that
is, the CIA) had created.
-
- Bin Laden explained to his worshippers
that he knew the time when each airliner would ram its target:
-
- They [the Islamic television viewers]
were overjoyed when the first plane hit the building, so I said to them:
Be patient. The difference between the first and the second plane hitting
the towers was 20 minutes. And the difference between the first plane
and the plane that hit the Pentagon was one hour.
-
- That is, bin Laden did not even understand
that these differences in time were the inexperienced pilots' distance:
speed = time miscalculations, which could lead to interception. He represented
these dangerous mistakes as the time differences he had planned and calculated,
and hence, while those worshippers of his were overjoyed by the first hit,
he knew that the second one would follow in 20 minutes and the third in
an hour.
-
- Planning! Calculation! Science and
technology in the 21st century! From Afghanistan, the scientific-technological
genius of bin Laden "planned and carried out" the operation in
the United States, as Tony Blair's "intelligence report" had
put it on Oct. 4, 2001. Bin Laden had seen him on the Islamic television,
with captions in Arabic, and out-Blaired Tony Blair!
-
- Curiously, bin Laden said nothing about
the fourth airliner. What was its target? The American media (and the
FBI) did not know, and hence he did not even mention the fourth airliner.
-
- By his videotape the feeble-minded megalomaniac
proved beyond reasonable doubt not only that he had nothing to do with
the hijacking and ramming of Sept. 11, 2001, but also that he was mentally
unfit to mastermind any suicidal terrorist act, even if he had been personally
present on its site.
-
- The 19 suicidal terrorists were 19 individuals
- 19 biographies, each worthy of Dostoyevsky's pen. But bin Laden, whom
the United States has made better known than any writer or thinker alive,
has been a bureaucrat whose bureaucracy was created for him by the CIA,
and those terrorists whom he mentions by name on his videotape, because
the American media had been mentioning them by name, are to him like construction
workers he once hired for his family construction corporation. No need
to know anything about them.
-
- In his bureaucratic perception, reflected
by the videotape, suicidal terrorists were just like, for example, bricklayers,
except that their trade was not to lay bricks, but to sacrifice their lives,
without him remembering even the names of all of them as listed by the
FBI on the Internet.
-
- He did not explain why at least eight,
if not 15, of them were Saudis, and not one of them was from Afghanistan.
Who cared where the bricklayers were from? Theirs was to die as unknown
bricklayers, and bin Laden's was to be a world celebrity, better known
than anyone else alive, owing to the United States, and seated in his high
office, "planning and carrying out" global Islamic terrorism
via expendable cogs of his bureaucratic machine (built by the CIA).
-
- If bin Laden and his al-Qaeda bureaucrats
had been personally present in the United States in 2000 and 2001 to "plan
and carry out" the terrorist act of Sept. 11, there would have been
no such act. The bureaucrats, headed by a feeble-minded megalomaniac,
dealing with suicidal terrorists as with bricklayers hired by a construction
corporation in Saudi Arabia, would have ruined the spirit of joint self-sacrifice,
would have brought the suicidal idealism down to the level of their own
earthly and cowardly selves, and would have replaced the exalted martyrdom
with megalomaniac administrative orders, inevitable grudges against them,
wrangling, rivalries, cowardice and other awakenings of earthly egoism,
leading the would-be terrorists into the FBI's custody.
-
- Bin Laden and his al-Qaeda bureaucrats
ran away in the war in Afghanistan and dropped behind their records incriminating
would-be terrorists. How could they be in charge of unanimous suicide
in whatever transcendental cause? Quite likely, the 19 suicidal terrorists
would have first assassinated bin Laden and his entourage as insolent frauds,
cowards and agents provocateur.
-
- It is not for nothing that Dostoyevsky
argued that the freest (and most dangerous) person is someone ready to
commit suicide. On Jan. 16, 2002, it was reported that John Walker, an
American who had fought for the Taliban, said that he had seen bin Laden
before Sept. 11, 2001, and the man told him about the forthcoming terrorist
act. So, bin Laden blabbed about a terrorist act involving 19 terrorist
lives to an American as to a friend so close and trustworthy as to be absolutely
sure that the information would never reach the CIA.
-
- For many years the media will keep publishing
such lies, allegedly showing bin Laden's ubiquitous masterminding of global
Islamic terrorism. But no lies can disprove bin Laden's videotape in which
he demonstrated, owing to his stupidity and megalomania, that he had nothing
to do with the hijacking and ramming of Sept. 11, 2001, much as he and
all those obsessed with him have wanted to prove the opposite.
-
-
-
- Source Notes 1. See http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/terror_chron.html
<1aReturn
-
- 2. See http://www.smh.com.au/news/0201/17/world/world1.html
<2aReturn
-
- 3. Barbara Starr, CNN, Jan. 12, 2002.
See http://asia.cnn.com/2002/US/01/11/ret.singapore plot/ <3aReturn
-
- 4. See http://washingtontimes.com/world/20011115-67453174.htm,
pp. 1-2. <4aReturn
-
-
- ***
-
-
- This is an excerpt from Lev Navrozov's
book in progress, "Out of Moscow and Into New York: A Life in the
Geostrategically Lobotomized West in the Age of Terrorism and Post-nuclear
Superweapons.
-
- PUBLISHERS: Should you consider publishing
this book (please bear in mind that a substantial advance is expected),
the 27-page Proposal and the first 106-page section of the book can be
mailed to you if you apply to me (navlev@cloud9.net tel. 001 718 796 6028)
or to my literary agent, Lenny Cavallaro, Janus Literary Agency (USKlene@aol.com).
-
-
- All Rights Reserved © NewsMax.com
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/2/4/05600.shtml
|
