-
- Well, folks, I've seen enough. I am now persuaded that
there is something highly strange and highly interesting going on on Mars.
I am also completely convinced that NASA/JPL/MSSS are very much aware of
this and are actively concealing the full truth from the rest of us. If
the information I posted in the previous four installments of "Curious
Martian Anomalies" was not enough to convince you of this, then perhaps
the photos and commentary that follow below will be. All of the photos
in this installment come from the Elysium Region, Mars Chart 15, on the
Malin Space Science Systems (MSSS) website.
-
- But before I get to these highly interesting photos I
want to first say a few things. In my previous post (see "Curious
Martian Anomalies: Part IV, Photo No. 6"), I linked to an MSSS photo
that I thought might depict water springs flowing from the base of hills
and cliffs on Mars. Before the week was out, MSSS and NASA held a press
conference to announce that they had discovered evidence that suggested
the presence on Mars of many water springs flowing from the sides of craters
and valley walls. It is encouraging to see MSSS and NASA publicly discuss
a possibility that has occurred to me and to many others who have examined
these photos with an analytical eye. I believe that there might be substantially
more water on Mars than NASA/JPL/MSSS have revealed. I am not saying Mars
is a lush, tropical paradise -- clearly it is not. On the other hand, conditions
there may well be more favorable for life than we have been told. Even
in the driest deserts on earth, in the depths of the Sahara or the blazing
sands of Arabia, where it may not rain one drop for years on end, there
is life (small, hardy, plants, insects and microbes), and even occasional,
scattered oases with pools of water.
-
- While the environment on Mars appears to be harsh, life
is resourceful and resilient and with the possible discovery of many, multiple
water sources on Mars and the apparent possibility of extensive aquifers
at comparatively shallow depths, I suggest we have to look at Mars with
new eyes. There just might be life on Mars, maybe even a lot of it, and
maybe we are seeing evidence of it in some of the photos that NASA/JPL/MSSS
are releasing to the internet. I am inclined to think that we are seeing
evidence of past and maybe even present life on Mars in the most recent
flood of photos from Mars. Of course, I admit of the possibility that I
might be wrong-- but I really think I'm right! I do believe that NASA/JPL/MSSS
are concealing very interesting and history-making evidence from us, to
their everlasting discredit.
-
- Let me make just a few more comments and then I'll get
right to this installment's highly interesting photos! A couple of days
ago, one of my readers called my attention to a new book that is available
on the internet -- free for you to download. The book is entitled, "The
Mars Records", and is an account of the alleged experiences of a man
named Michael Relfe, transcribed and copyrighted by his wife, Stephanie
Relfe. Briefly, Mr. Relfe believes that while in the military he was part
of a covert United States military program on Mars. As I understand the
book, it alleges that covert elements of the military have established
a huge operation on Mars (Mr. Relfe refers to a Mars base with two or three
million people) in collaboration with so-called "Little Grey"
aliens. Mr. Relfe thinks that he was teleported there for twenty years,
then returned to Earth, after having his memories "wiped" and
his age regressed by high technology and then lived out an alternate timeline
here on Earth. This is a story full of allusions to electronic mind control,
pharmaceutical mind control, remote viewing, high-tech teleportation, covert
Mars operations and alternate time-lines and realities -- with the active
collusion and connivance of highly secretive components of the United States
military.
-
- Click here to go to "The Mars Records": http://www.themarsrecords.com
-
- At first when I read it I have to admit that I thought:
"This has to be a disinformation plot hatched by the military intelligence
agencies to muddy the waters, to make intelligent discussion of what is
happening on Mars more difficult and confusing. It is nonsensical noise
thrown out on the internet to confuse matters." And I also noticed
the similarity of what Mr. And Mrs. Relfe are alleging to the plot line
in the Arnold Schwarzenegger film, "Total Recall". I thought
perhaps the Relfes were simply influenced by the plot of the movie, maybe
even subconsciously, without their necessarily being aware of it, or without
any negative intent on their part.
-
- But then I thought: "On the other hand, what if
both are true? As astonishing as the premise of the movie "Total Recall"
is, and as bizarre as Michael Relfe's story seems, what if they are true?
What if Hollywood insiders with a pipeline to solid information, and now,
Michael Relfe, have an angle on the truth? What if they are both telling
us something about what is really happening on Mars? What if there is a
substantial, covert operation on Mars, using secret, high technology and
covert operations personnel, funded through the Pentagon's massive "black
budget", and NASA and JPL and MSSS are simply the public relations
smoke screen thrown in our faces, literally, on the internet and on our
TV screens, like the red cape waved in bulls' faces by matadors, to keep
us blissfully unaware of the truth? Would that explain all the fuzzy, blurry
or outright missing, blank and highly degraded photos that NASA/JPL/MSSS
have posted to the internet (and I'll provide more examples of some of
those sorts of photos below)? Would that explain the spate of Mars probes
that NASA and JPL have hurled at the Red Planet, only to meekly announce
upon arrival, "Oops! It's not phoning home. I guess we made a boo-boo."
-
- I don't know absolutely that NASA/JPL/MSSS are lying
about what is happening on Mars. But I do know that they are not very forthcoming
with information. I also know they release a lot of seriously degraded
and blank photos -- courtesy of many millions of dollars of high technology!
I also know that even in the photos that do have discernible detail there
are many anomalies that these agencies mention little, or not at all. Space
exploration is what they do! It is all they do! Yet they find something
interesting and make virtually no pronouncements at all. This is so strange
as to stagger belief. And it raises large questions about their real motivations
and hidden agendas. That is how I see it. I might be wrong, of course --
but I really do believe I'm right! How else to explain their behavior?
-
- So, I am willing to give Michael and Stephanie Relfe
a hearing. Maybe what they have produced is disinformation. If it is it
is highly entertaining! But just maybe there is an element of truth in
their story. Regular readers of the "Sightings" website and listeners
to the "Sightings" radio show already know about covert mind
control programs that the military agencies and the CIA have been involved
in, for decades now. Regular "Sightings" listeners and readers
also know about the covert remote viewing projects of the United States
military agencies and the CIA. All of this material is thoroughly well
documented. Regular "Sightings" readers and listeners also know
about a variety of clandestine operations that the United States military
runs and funds via the "black budget". Jeff Rense has had numerous
guests on his show to discuss these topics in recent years. He has also
posted numerous articles on these topics on his website.
-
- So there is a factual basis, documented in the public
domain, for much (though not all) of what the Relfes discuss. Does that
in itself make Michael Relfe's story true? No, it doesn't. But it does
make it just plausible enough that I am willing to give him a hearing and
wait to make a final judgement until we have more evidence.
-
- One of the things that Michael Relfe mentions in "The
Mars Records" is that he was pilot of some sort of space ship on Mars.
This immediately made me remember the "Stealth Radar Region"
referenced in my "Curious Martian Anomalies: Part IV, Photo No. 2".
What in the world is a "Stealth Radar Region" in the Martian
context? Might it conceivably bear some relation to the very strange tale
that Michael and Stephanie Relfe relate? I simply do not know. If you do
have the answer to this or other anomalies on Mars please e-mail me with
the details.
-
- Finally, "The Mars Records" makes overt mention
of the alleged involvement of the United States Navy in covert Martian
and mind control operations. This immediately rang a couple of bells with
me. In recent years a number of people have told me or strongly intimated
to me that the United States Navy is heavily involved in clandestine operations
involving UFOs and also covert underground and undersea facilities. Additionally,
in my book, "Kundalini Tales", I relate a highly strange incident
where I was detained against my will by the United States Navy and subjected
to a most curious interrogation in which I was photographed and then briefly
and bizarrely interrogated by a white uniformed Naval officer who leaned
right in my face and asked me: "Mr. Sauder, do you know who I am?"
I did not recognize him and told him so. He then slightly rephrased the
question and asked again if we knew each other. I told him that I did not
think we knew one another. He persisted, and asked yet a third time, "Are
you sure you've never seen me before?" I replied that I did not know
him. My answers appeared to satisfy him and within minutes I was released
by the Navy. It was most bizarre. I was not charged with a crime, but yet
was detained, photographed and interrogated in this highly strange way
that absolutely violated my human rights. It is clear that the U.S. Navy
was playing a mind game with me -- but how deep does the game go? Is there
a reason why I should have known that officer? Has someone put mental blocks
in place in my mind to prevent me from remembering certain people that
I know and certain events that I have experienced? Was that Navy officer
perhaps checking to see if my mental blocks were still in place? I have
often wondered about that. Reading "The Mars Records" by Michael
and Stephanie Relfe raised many questions for me.
-
- My book, "Kundalini Tales", delves heavily
into the question of alternate realities and electronic mind control. It
is a personal account of high strangeness in my own life. If you read "Kundalini
Tales" you will see why I am willing to at least give "The Mars
Record" a hearing. Because of what has happened in my own life I know
unequivocally that reality is much richer and multifaceted than the "dumb
and dumber" version of terrestrial and extraterrestrial affairs that
the TV networks present to us for our daily mental anaesthetic via the
six o'clock news. Click here to go to "Kundalini Tales": http://www.sauderzone.com/kt.htm
-
- By purchasing my books you help to support my research.
-
- Now to the photos, all of which are from the Elysium
region, Mars Chart 15 on the Malin Space Science Systems (MSSS) website:
-
-
- 1) http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/images/M0101525.html
-
- There are a number of things to say about this most interesting
photo. First, like so many other NASA/JPL/MSSS photos, it is fuzzy and
blurry and I wonder why. Second, I think you will agree that the prominent
crater in the upper left looks surprisingly geometrically regular -- the
left edge is just off the frame, but from what is visible it appears it
may be a pentagonal, perhaps hexagonal shape. I'm sure I am not the only
person who finds that odd. Third, notice the straight line down the middle
of the photo and associated pattern of white "snow"-like material
that is near it. These features appear to be "noise" from the
digital photographic process.
-
-
- 2) http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/images/M0100721.html
-
- Sigh. Here we go again. Another blurry, fuzzy, out-of-focus,
contrast-skewed-all-to-**** photo. The $29 camera I got on sale at K-Mart
10 years ago and which has a slightly scratched lens takes photos that
are far, far clearer than this.
-
- Notice the "line" down the center of this photo.
It is very much like the "line" in the first photo. It goes straight
as an arrow from top to bottom of the frame. The same "snow"-like
matter surrounds it. Only in this photo the "line" is more visible
and there is more "snow". I believe that, as in Photo No. 1 above,
the "line" and "snow" are likely to be artificial features--
probable artifacts of a faulty digital imaging process. But the really
interesting thing in this photo is the rectilinear geological feature that
closely parallels the "line" in the upper portion of the photograph.
In other words, the axis of the linear feature almost exactly parallels
the orbital track of the satellite. It is likely that NASA/JPL/MSSS knew
that this linear feature was there and specifically targeted it in this
shot. Too bad they haven't released a higher quality image to us -- it
might prove very interesting.
-
-
- 3) http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/images/M0100039.html
http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/images/M0100040.html
-
- Both of these images are labeled "NA Dark Current
Image". Whatever that means. They are in the same region and whatever
is on these photos I can most definitely assure you of one thing: neither
you, nor I, will be seeing it today, because there is nothing there in
these photos to be seen. Nothing at all. Both photos are degraded to the
point of complete nothingness.
-
-
- 4) http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/images/M0102924.html
-
- Here is another fuzzy, blurry, out-of-focus photo. I
have discovered a number of such photos in this region of Mars. I have
also noticed some interesting anomalies in this region of Mars. (Gee, do
you think there might be a correlation there?) But to the matter at hand:
notice the pattern of linear features that slants across the photo and
over which a series of black squares have been prominently placed. We are
back again to the same point: 1) either the extremely poor quality of the
photo, including insertion of the many, small black squares is intentional,
and there are features here that NASA/JPL/MSSS do not want you and me to
see, or 2) these well funded high-tech agencies have trouble taking a simple,
decent photograph and beaming it back to Earth. Take your pick.
-
- By the way, I notice a surprising number of other, smaller
rectilinear features when I enlarge the photo in my browser. I don't know
if the many rectilinear lines occur because of, or despite, the poor photographic
quality. Unfortunately, it's hard to decide this conundrum with this photo
(and many similar ones) because the quality of the NASA/JPL/MSSS photography
is so very, and pitifully poor. But if the myriad rectilinear features
are physically there, in reality, then it is conceivable that they are
some sort of ancient ruins. Or perhaps, who knows, brand spanking new constructions
-- maybe even built by the Pentagon??!! Wouldn't that be a mind bender,
if true?! (See "The Mars Records" above, by Michael and Stephanie
Relfe.)
-
-
- 5) http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/images/M0101916.html
-
- More extreme fuzziness and blurriness. (So what's new?)
More rectilinear lines and rectangular and square structures. Look in the
upper right hand part of the photo, in particular. It may help to click
on the image and enlarge it in your browser screen. Also, more small, black
squares, many associated with a curvilinear feature in the lower right
part of the photo. The same questions again: are the many, interesting
rectilinear lines and several evident square and rectangular features an
artifact of the extremely poor quality of the digital photography? Or are
they there in reality, but obscured by poor photography to the point where
they are barely recognizable as possible/probable/evident artificial constructions?
You decide which it is.
-
-
- 6) http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/images/SP124004.html
-
- "Dark Streak." I'll say. Take a close look
at this one. Click on it and enlarge it in your browser. What is it? It
is unlike anything I have seen yet on Mars and I've looked at a ton of
the new MSSS photos. Is it a volcanic rill? An old lava flow? A water course?
A stream bed? Something else? Has the NASA/JPL/MSSS digital air brush been
at work here again? You decide.
-
-
- 7) http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/images/SP123805.html
-
- Here's another Pulitzer quality photo. Sigh. Is there
something interesting in this photo? Who can possibly tell? There are just
buckets of these awful photos. I mean really, really bad. Lots of them.
Intentional? Accidental? You decide.
-
-
- 8) http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/images/M0301515.html
-
- Here we go again. There are intriguing, dark, rill-like
features that bisect what appear to be the remnants of a vastly ancient
and heavily eroded crater. However, when you look at the close-up, narrow
angle photo that, judging from the little white, position rectangle in
the context photo, ought to encompass a portion of the smaller rill in
the bottom of the frame, you quickly discover that the feature of real
interest there is... well, it's not there. It's missing from the frame.
However, the top of the frame has an interesting feature: it is also missing!
Not there. Just electronically snipped off. It almost gives the impression
that the bottom of the frame where the dark rill ought to be (but isn't)
was snipped off and to compensate, the electronically excised bottom portion
of the photo was just digitally added to the top of the frame, minus the
feature of interest, of course. That is one possible explanation for the
missing data. I admit of other possibilities. But at the very least it
is transparently clear that: 1) NASA/JPL/MSSS have removed data from the
top of the narrow angle photo; and 2) that the narrow angle photo does
not contain information in its lower portion that the context photo clearly
indicates should be there. Why? You decide.
-
-
- And so it goes. High strangeness on Mars. As for the
quality of many of the photos that NASA/JPL/MSSS are putting up on the
internet. Ha! Go to your local bookstore and look at a photo album from
the American Civil War. More than a century ago photographers were taking
combat photos, under battlefield conditions, using flash pans and covered
wagons out in the fields and woods for dark rooms, and the quality was
far superior to many of the photos that the United States government's
high-tech space agencies are putting out for public consumption today.
'Nuff said.
-
- I call it the way I see it, and that's the way it looks
to me.
-
-
- MainPage
http://www.rense.com
-
-
-
- This
Site Served by TheHostPros
|