Rense.com



The Body Brokers - Average
Corpse Now Worth $220,000
By Mark Katches - The Orange County Register
http://www.ocregister.com/health/body/rti0709.shtml
7-10-00
 
 
 
INVESTIGATION: Act banned by national tissue bank group
 
Here are the key findings from the Orange County Register's investigation into the human tissue trade. Nonprofit tissue banks solicit skin, bone, heart valves, veins and tendons from grieving families who are told nothing about the value of their gifts. The parts from one cadaver can be worth more than $220,000 to companies and tissue banks. Tissue banks act as middlemen for corporate partners, some of which are traded on Wall Street. The human tissue trade is estimated at about $500 million a year.
 
It is against the law to sell body parts, but companies and tissue banks are allowed to charge "reasonable fees" for human tissue. The National Organ Transplant Act does not define "reasonable.'' Cadaver skin is used to enhance penis size, puff up lips or erase laugh lines. Plastic surgeons have reported no trouble obtaining skin for plastic surgery, but burn centers across the country are struggling to find skin to treat burn victims. The top executives at nonprofit tissue banks earn an average of more than $135,000 a year. One Los Angeles nonprofit tissue bank paid its top executive $533,450 a year and provides a BMW for his commute. Tissue banks continue to compete for access to cadavers in Southern California, including Orange County.
 
Eighty-five percent of the nation's organ recovery agencies have ties to for-profit companies that craft products from body parts. The ties are not disclosed to donor families when consent is sought to remove body parts.
 
ABOUT THE COMPANY
 
Regeneration Technologies, based in Alachua, Fla., is the fastest growing maker of products from human body parts. The company's revenue - derived all from sales of donated tissue - soared from $13.5 million in 1997 to $73 million last year. The company reported 4,000 cadaver donors in 1999 - representing about 34 percent of all human tissue recovered in the United States.
 
February 1998: The University of Florida Tissue Bank, a nonprofit organization, spins off a private company called Regeneration Technologies Inc. The company and tissue bank share office space, phone lines and employees.
 
November 1999: The company buys most operations of the nonprofit Georgia Tissue Bank. The firm has also acquired or taken control of tissue bank operations in Wisconsin and Alabama. The firm now has more than 30 tissue suppliers nationwide.
 
April 1999: The firm submits plans to sell its stock to the public in hopes of raising $86.2 million. In its public filings, the company unveils its new BioCleanse technology allowing the company to mix bone from up to 100 donors.
 
May 1999: Robert Hoffman, director of the University of Wisconsin Hospital organ procurement organization, resigns and agrees to pay back more than $86,000 he received for sending skin and bone to two tissue banks, including one controlled by Regeneration Technologies.
 
Source: Regeneration Technologies Inc. and Register research.
 
 
 
 
A Florida company plans to mix bone from up to 100 cadavers in products it makes from donated human body parts, a practice banned by most of the nation's tissue banks because of fears it can spread disease.
 
The new methods employed by Regeneration Technologies Inc. disregard safety standards adopted 12 years ago by the American Association of Tissue Banks in the wake of an outbreak of deaths in Japan. The methods fall outside the regulatory guidelines of the federal Food and Drug Administration.
 
The company says it has the technology to combine bone from up to 100 donors simultaneously, but is currently mixing body parts from three to five cadavers in a single batch. The products made from those batches are sold to doctors and hospitals.
 
"I think the public just assumes there are standards for distribution and handling of tissue,'' said University of Pennsylvania bioethicist Arthur Caplan. "They'd be shocked to find out how much variation and discretion there is. It's a bright red flag that has been waving for some time.''
 
Caplan said the issue of mixing or pooling tissue points to holes in the regulations, an area he said the federal government needs to review.
 
The two-year-old firm - which gets bone from Orange County cadavers through a network of tissue bank suppliers - has set out to revolutionize the way body parts are handled. Regeneration Technologies is already the fastest growing maker of products from human parts and is about to sell its stock to the public. It said in federal filings that its "BioCleanse'' methods are safe, efficient and reliable.
 
"With BioCleanse, the chance of disease transmission is virtually eliminated,'' Richard Allen, the company's chief financial officer said earlier this year. The company refused to answer more questions about the process, citing Securities and Exchange Commission rules about talking to the media right before an initial public offering.
 
The firm makes specialty pins, screws and dowels from human bone and reported to the SEC that its methods will speed up production at its Florida assembly lines.
 
"We believe we are the only tissue processor currently able to safely process tissue from multiple donors simultaneously,'' the company states in its SEC filings. The company's stock sale could come any day.
 
Disease Worries
 
Leaders at the American Association of Tissue Banks, however, worry about the consequences for patients and the public. More than 40 deaths were documented in Japan during the 1980s linked to tissue processed in batches. Association executives say there is no conclusive proof that pooling body parts is any safer today. The association's ban on pooling body parts requires all parts be processed one donor at a time in isolated clean-rooms. Tissue cannot be mixed "during retrieval, processing, preservation or storage,'' according to the association's policies.
 
Failure to comply with the rules can cost a tissue bank its accreditation in the voluntary group, but Regeneration Technologies does not belong to the association and is not bound by its rules.
 
"No one has yet submitted to the FDA, or to us or in any scientific peer review, any evidence validating a process that would allow for pooling of donors with protections against cross contamination,'' said Bob Rigney, chief executive officer of the American Association of Tissue Banks.
 
"We won't even allow tissue from two donors in the same room,'' said Billy Anderson, president of LifeNet, a Virginia organ recovery agency and Regeneration Technologies' competitor. "If I had a process today where I could do it, I wouldn't. I just think there is a risk that is not worth taking."
 
Anderson knows about the risks. AIDS-tainted body parts distributed by LifeNet killed three people in the early 1990s even though the agency screened the tissue for the HIV virus. The test back then was not as sophisticated as it is today. The tissue and organs tainted with the AIDS virus were not pooled with other donors, but the case has contributed to the reluctance of industry leaders to take what they call "unnecessary risks.''
 
"There is always an unknown factor," Anderson said, "an unknown virus or something we can't test for.''
 
A single cadaver can provide more than 100 tissue grafts. If tissue from 100 donors were mixed together, up to 10,000 pieces of tissue could potentially face a recall if it turned out one of the donors carried a serious disease, said Anderson. Once infected tissue is implanted in another human, it's too late to recall it. Tracking down tissue from a huge pool of donors would be a logistical nightmare, he said.
 
In its public filings, RTI says it has validated its findings and its technology.
 
"Our validation studies of the BioCleanse system show this process kills or inactivates all classes of conventional pathogens, viruses, including HIV, microbes, bacteria and fungi present in the tissue, while retaining the useful properties,'' according to the company's SEC filing. But in the same document, the company also notes that "we can never completely eliminate the risk of errors, defects or failures'' in any of the firm's processing and distribution.
 
The BioCleanse system takes three hours and uses ultrasonic, temperature and pressure cycle controls to clean body parts in a machine that is essentially a $500,000 computerized dishwasher. After bone is subjected to the process, it comes out looking bright white "due to the aggressive cleansing process,'' according to company literature. The company states that its validation studies were successful, and that it believes "with a high degree of confidence that the BioCleanse process adequately reduces the potential for cross-contamination.''
 
The company says the technology has helped triple the output of bone products at the Alachua, Florida facility. The firm also says the state of New York has approved the use of BioCleanse there. New York is the only state that has requirements against using pooled tissue. The state Department of Health granted an exemption in February after seeing validation results from the company, said New York health spokeswoman Claire Pospisil.
 
Bruce Stroever, who runs the nation's largest nonprofit tissue bank, said in a statement to the Register that his Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation would not pool donors, noting most tissue implant procedures are not life-saving and do not have to be done immediately. A patient can wait for the proper graft, Stroever said, so there is no need to rush the processing or expose a patient to any risks.
 
"A great deal of attention has been directed towards the rights of the family in giving consent for the use of their loved one's tissues,'' Stroever said. "There is a similar obligation to the recipient that the graft comes from the best possible donor available.''
 
Other industry leaders worry about what can happen when tissue from 100 cadaver donors is placed in the same room.
 
"There's always a potential for something to go wrong,'' said Lori Schutte, executive director for St. Louis-based Mid-America Transplant Association, one of the nation's largest organ and tissue recovery programs. "Why do you wear a seatbelt? Most of the time you don't get hit by a car, but it minimizes your risk."
 
Few FDA Rules
 
The FDA has few regulations governing use of human tissue. Federal law prohibits anyone from selling body parts, but allows companies and tissue banks to charge "reasonable fees" for processing skin, bone, ligaments and other parts into commercial products.
 
An Orange County Register investigation found that donated body parts are treated as raw materials crafted into lucrative products sold to surgeons, dentists and hospitals for treatments ranging from healing severely fractured bones to enlarging penis size.
 
FDA spokeswoman Lenore Gelb said current regulations focus on screening donors and that the pooling of human tissue "hasn't been much of an issue up to this point.''
 
The FDA is "considering addressing pooling more specifically in future regulations,'' she said but would not give details. Regeneration Technologies has not submitted any scientific studies to the FDA validating its new technology, she added.
 
But Ernest Carabillo, a former FDA official hired as a consultant by Regeneration Technologies, said the company does not have to file scientific findings with the federal agency.
 
"There is no requirement to do so,'' he said. The FDA was given a demonstration of the process about a year ago, Carabillo said, but the agency has no "mechanism to approve a process at this point in time.''
 
Carabillo said he believes the tissue bank association critics are simply jealous of the technology.
 
"Quite candidly, I think this is all about the fact they're left behind,'' said Carabillo, a pharmacist and lawyer.
 
Just 10 years ago, the human tissue business was estimated as a $20 million niche market. Now it has emerged into a full-fledged industry expected to hit $1 billion by 2003. The FDA has had trouble keeping pace with the explosive growth and doesn't even know how many tissue banks exist. The national tissue bank association has wanted to police itself, but has no sway over non members.
 
Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala ordered a sweeping probe of the industry in June in the wake of the Register investigation. Initial findings are due next month.
 
Fast growing firm
 
Regeneration Technologies is one of the reasons for the growth. The firm reported $73 million in sales last year - up from $35.3 million the previous year.
 
The company has applied for an international patent for its new process in hopes of taking its pooling technology overseas.
 
It has been a whirlwind first two years for Regeneration Technologies. The company has bought or taken control of nonprofit tissue banks in Georgia, Alabama and Wisconsin. It has a growing list of tissue bank suppliers, including Baltimore-based Tissue Banks International which runs the Orange County Eye and Tissue Bank in Santa Ana.
 
The company is more aggressive in the harvesting of body parts, taking tissue from donors as old as 101 years of age at the time of death. Most tissue banks take body parts from donors no older than 70 years of age, the Register found in its investigation of the industry.
 
Regeneration Technologies also has developed a bonus program where employees are paid extra for enlisting new mortuaries, county coroners or tissue banks as clients, according to its stock proposal. The program encourages employees to raid the client list of other tissue banks.
 
Its initial public offering is expected to earn anywhere from $4.5 million to $15.6 million for its founder, James "Jamie" Grooms, who previously headed the nonprofit University of Florida Tissue Bank. The tissue bank spun off the private firm and is located in the same building as Regeneration Technologies. _____
 
Staff Writer William Heisel contributed to this report. Mark Katches can be reached at (714) 796-7724 or by e-mail at <mailto:Mark_Katches@notes.freedom.com.
.
 
 
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
 
 
 
This Site Served by TheHostPros