Rense.com



Oldest Jewellery Dunks
'Out of Africa' Theory

By Damian Carrington
NewScientist.com
21-9-2

The ornamental shells and rabbit-hunting of prehistoric peoples are shedding new light on the great debate over the origin of modern humans.

Recent discoveries of similarly-aged adornments and changes in hunting practices at widely dispersed sites across Europe and Asia suggests that these modern human behaviours arose simultaneously in many places.

This provides evidence for the "continuity" theory of modern human development, i.e. that development occurred in parallel in different populations across the world. The alternative "out of Africa" theory suggests that an exodus from that continent about 50,000 years ago swept across the world, driving indigenous populations to extinction.
 
Ornament shells from Turkey Photo: H. Stiner
 
Mary Stiner, from the University of Arizona, told the American Association for the Advancement of Science's annual conference that the earliest examples of adornment occur close in time in at least four different places. Stiner's own work has uncovered shells in Turkey that were punctured in a deliberate way between 40,000 and 45,000 years ago.

These holes, for stringing the beads, could not have been made by accident or by predatory molluscs, she says. Contemporaneous finds of ostrich eggshell beads have also been made in Kenya, and other adornments have been unearthed in Lebanon and Bulgaria.

Tortoises and hares

Further work by Stiner and colleague Steven Kuhn in several Upper Paleolithic sites around the Mediterranean has revealed a change in the prey hunted by early humans in the east about 40,000 to 50,000 years ago. Stiner says there are also early indications of similar changes in Africa.

Their analysis showed a significant shift from slow-reproducing and easy-to-catch animals like shellfish and tortoises, to quickly-reproducing and more agile animals like partridges, hares, and rabbits. The reason for the shift is likely to be an increased pressure on resources, Stiner says: "If you have over-used your preferred resource, you can respond by turning to lower-ranked, harder-to-catch resources."

An increasing population may also explain the use of adornments, due to the increased need to communicate with each other. "Ornamentation is universal among all modern human foragers," says Stiner, noting that these groups use the ornaments to convey information about kinship and status to outsiders.

Fossils and genes

The timing of these two behavioral changes, long after the first appearance of anatomically modern humans in the fossil record, "makes it clear that modern human behavior doesn't appear at the same time that skeletally modern humans do," Stiner concludes.

She believes archaeology has some key advantages over other approaches in studying the rise of early humans: "The nice thing about archaeology, something that's missing from fossil and genetic data, is that we have a fairly refined level of detail on the age and geographic location of our evidence."

Archaeologist Lawrence Straus, from the University of New Mexico, agrees the evidence supports the continuity theory: "The ongoing process of human adaptation was a long, drawn out process, mosaic in nature. The idea of a total and abrupt replacement of an inferior species 40,000 years ago has in my opinion been fabricated."

Damian Carrington, Boston
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991938


Email This Article





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros