Rense.com



NJ Judge Orders End To 911
Secret Detentions - DOJ Appeals

By Jim Edwards
New Jersey Law Journal
4-3-2

Warning that law enforcers have no right to suspend the normal workings of democracy even after attacks such as those of Sept. 11, a New Jersey state court judge ruled March 26 that county jail authorities could not keep secret the names of aliens detained on immigration charges for the federal government.
 
The ruling, though it was immediately appealed and stayed, was the first clear victory for the American Civil Liberties Union in its efforts to learn the identities of Muslim men detained in secret since Sept. 11, and to open closed-door immigration hearings. The majority of post-Sept. 11 detainees have been kept in New Jersey on immigration violations, housed in Hudson and Passaic county jails under contract with the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
 
The ACLU had brought four such suits nationally but until last week the civil rights organization had seen only limited success, obtaining a list of blacked-out names of detainees from the federal district court in Washington, D.C.
 
On the ninth floor of a Hudson County, N.J., courthouse shrouded in daylong fog and rain, Superior Court Judge Arthur D'Italia said that the public has a right to county jail records under N.J.S.A. 30:8-16 (written in 1898) and N.J.A.C. 10A:31-6.5, both of which detail records that must be made available for public inspection, with few exceptions or qualifications.
 
"The legislative purpose is to prevent secret arrests," D'Italia said. He noted that no matter how awful the events of Sept. 11, nor how pressing the government's investigation of the attacks, the federal government was still required to obey the law. "Nothing is easier for the government to assert that the disclosure of the arrest of X interferes with the investigation of Y."
 
During oral arguments, D'Italia made it plain to both sides that he wanted "common sense" to prevail. The motions required him to sift through at least four sets of statutes and regulations, framed between 1989 and 1997, some of which stood in contradiction to each oth
 
http://www.law.com


Email This Article





MainPage
http://www.rense .com


This Site Served by TheHostPros