Rense.com



For Bush, Secrecy Is A
Matter Of Loyalty

By Laurence McQuillan, USA TODAY
USAToday.com
3-15-2

"I have a duty to protect the executive branch from legislative encroachment."
 
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration has refused to tell Congress the names of business executives and others who met with Vice President Cheney's energy task force before it proposed a new energy policy.
 
It has encouraged agencies to reject public requests for documents under the Freedom of Information Act and is providing Justice Department lawyers to defend rejections.
 
It kept nearly all members of Congress in the dark about a "shadow government" of 75 to 150 executive branch officials living in underground bunkers at secret sites outside Washington in case terrorists strike the nation's capital. Even House Speaker Dennis Hastert, next in line to the presidency after Cheney, was only vaguely aware of the emergency plan, aides say.
 
For generations, it has been recognized that information is power in
 
Washington, and few have been as successful as President Bush in holding tight to information and releasing it selectively. But now his success has triggered a backlash in Congress, where lawmakers complain that the administration is withholding crucial information.
 
The White House "is getting a little imperious about not sharing any ideas with anybody," Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Joseph Biden, D-Del., complains.
 
"I don't buy that, frankly," Bush said at a news conference Wednesday when a reporter asked about the gripes. "I have a duty to protect the executive branch from legislative encroachment."
 
Bush's defiant words caused dismay on Capitol Hill, as even GOP supporters warned that he risked fueling a confrontation.
 
Using a disciplined management style and a bit of old-fashioned fear, Bush and his lieutenants are not just withholding classified secrets from Congress. They're also exercising tight control over what administration officials can say and even which invitations to black-tie dinners staffers can accept.
 
Retribution is swift for those who violate White House rules or betray secrets. Republican insiders estimate that at least four people have lost administration jobs because they did not live up to the White House code of conduct: Never disagree with Bush in public, and don't talk about what you know without approval.
 
It's not uncommon for chief executives to worry about unauthorized leaks of national security information, internal policy disputes becoming public, or premature disclosures of presidential decisions. Moreover, Bush has cited the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks as reason for even greater secrecy " about Cheney's whereabouts or investigations of terrorist threats.
 
But Bush's desire to keep information close to the vest predates Sept. 11. It is ingrained in his character, has shaped his presidency, was at the core of his management style during his six years as Texas governor and made him the watchdog for leaks in his father's administration.
 
Bush's penchant for secrecy hasn't affected his popularity. A recent USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll puts his approval rating at 80%. But the public can be fickle: The first President Bush went from Gulf War hero to unemployment in less than two years. Some GOP loyalists worry that if Bush is perceived as too secretive, his public support and clout with Congress will erode.
 
Signs of rebellion already are brewing on Capitol Hill, where Republicans and Democrats are openly griping. The Government Accounting Office, a non-partisan arm of Congress, has sued the White House to disclose details about Cheney's task force. A clash also looms over the White House's refusal to let Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge testify before Congress.
 
House Government Reform Chairman Dan Burton, an Indiana Republican, angrily complained recently, "This is not a monarchy." He was upset that Bush blocked the committee's probe of alleged FBI abuses in Boston. Burton warned of a potential "war" with the White House unless attitudes change.
 
The festering anger from both parties could prompt lawmakers to block some of the money Bush wants for anti-terrorism programs and his domestic priorities.
 
"There's a lot of arrogance of power here," says James Dyer, the Republican staff director of the House Appropriations Committee. "If we are going to pay the bills, and if we're going to defend their programs, we've got to be told what they're doing." Appropriations Chairman C.W. Bill Young, R-Fla., plans to drive home that point today, when White House Budget Director Mitch Daniels appears before the panel.
 
Complaints about Bush's penchant for secrecy also are mounting beyond Capitol Hill. "We're very concerned about it," says Larry Klayman, executive director of Judicial Watch, a conservative group that was a nemesis of Democrat Bill Clinton when he was president. "This is a case where left and right agree. ... True conservatives don't act this way.
 
"We see an unprecedented secrecy in this White House that ... we find very troubling," he says.
 
Loyalty or retribution
 
Ron Kaufman, White House political director for Bush's father, says he admires the discipline the younger Bush has brought to the White House.
 
"It's the way they ran the campaign and it's the way they ran his governorship" in Texas, he says. "This shouldn't surprise anyone. This president is the most focused and disciplined man I've ever met."
 
For Bush, life is about loyalty, and anyone who discloses a secret is disloyal. It's that simple, "us against them," those close to him say. Of course, they won't say that on the record. Several prominent Republicans were willing to talk about Bush's style of managing only if assured that their names would not be used.
 
The fear of retribution is well placed. Mike Parker, a former Republican congressman from Mississippi, lost his job as head of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers last week. His offense? Being too candid before the Senate Budget Committee, administration officials say.
 
Aside from saying under oath that Bush budget cuts will have a "negative impact" on the corps, Parker told senators, "After being in the administration and dealing with them, I still don't have warm and fuzzy feelings for them."
 
A furious Daniels sent a transcript of Parker's comments to the White House. Parker was given 30 minutes to decide whether to resign or be fired. He resigned.
 
Daniels says Bush "makes certain that debate happens, and frequently in front of him, but ... once a decision's made, we move on. We don't revisit, we don't second-guess, we don't carp."
 
Other ousters were discreet. The officials quietly resigned.
 
"President Bush and Dick Cheney are really big on secrecy," says a prominent Republican who talks to both. "They've sent signals to everyone around them that this is the way they judge people, whether they can keep secrets. It all comes together to control leaks."
 
The reason: A leak about how a president is leaning whips up competing interest-group pressure to sway the final decision. It complicates the president's job and is viewed as an act of disloyalty.
 
It starts with Bush
 
"Evidently, somebody in our government wanted to show off to his family or her family," a piqued Bush said while squinting his eyes in disdain during a photo op at his Texas ranch Dec. 28. He had just been asked to react to reports about an internal Justice Department document on how to conduct military tribunals for terrorists.
 
Even though he noted that the memo "was on the front page of America's newspapers," he said he hadn't seen it. "The leaked report is preliminary," he said in dismissing it. The anger in his words sent a blunt message to every administration official: You serve at the pleasure of the president, and the president is not pleased.
 
Bush developed a distaste for the self-serving news leaks of Washington while his father " a former CIA director " spent eight years as Ronald Reagan's vice president and four years in the Oval Office himself. During those days, the son tried to keep an eye on those his father suspected of disloyalty.
 
When it was his turn at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Bush demanded loyalty, which includes keeping secrets. He surrounded himself with people who felt the same way " from Cheney to political strategist Karl Rove to counselor Karen Hughes, his longtime aide from Texas who is seen as the chief White House enforcer.
 
Hughes "really controls the message and the flow. She's the 800-pound gorilla that everybody's afraid of," says a veteran GOP insider who has worked for several presidents. "She has people fired and sends some pretty strong messages of no toleration" for breaking ranks.
 
Her control extends beyond just the message. White House officials who have been invited to the White House Correspondents' Association black-tie dinner in May say they are required to notify Hughes' office. If an official receives multiple invitations, which is common, she decides which one he or she can accept. That level of involvement over who attends the annual dinner appears to be unprecedented.
 
The desire to control extends beyond those who work for Bush. Even members of Congress have felt Bush's wrath.
 
Last October, he abruptly announced that only eight members of Congress would be given intelligence briefings. That cut off dozens of other lawmakers serving on oversight committees. At the time, it was widely assumed Bush was upset with an article in The Washington Post in which an intelligence official was quoted as telling lawmakers that there was a virtual certainty of more terrorist strikes.
 
It was actually a story in The Washington Times that had upset Bush, administration officials say. That account contained details of the targets U.S. military planners were zeroing in on in Afghanistan.
 
A fuming Bush called the account an "act of treason" and vowed to cut back on the number of people in Congress given advance notice about military actions. Eventually, the White House assured lawmakers that the constitutional obligation to keep them informed would be honored.
 
But today, the information flow remains restricted. Republican and Democratic members complain privately that many classified briefings are short on detail. Often they learn of decisions to send U.S. military units to places such as the Philippines or Yemen from the news media rather than an administration emissary.
 
"Congress, by and large, has been left to learn about major war-related decisions through newspaper articles," Senate Appropriations Chairman Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., charged Tuesday in an opinion piece in The New York Times. "Is it any wonder that members of Congress are beginning to question whether the administration is deliberately leaving Congress in the dark " or whether the administration is making major policy decisions on the fly, without taking time for due consideration or consultation?"
 
Bush is as insistent that aides keep quiet about what others say to him in confidence as he is about leaks of his own private words.
 
A White House official says one of presidential spokesman Ari Fleischer's biggest mistakes, in Bush's eyes, occurred recently when Fleischer told reporters what Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle said during a meeting with Bush. Fleischer was described as shaken by the rebuke.
 
Administration officials say Bush's fight for White House confidentiality reflects not just a personal preference, but also a constitutional principle. They say he believes that the executive branch's right to privacy has been undermined in recent years by Clinton, who they say repeatedly gave in to congressional demands for confidential executive branch documents.
 
Daniels says he has heard both Bush and Cheney "say that they believe they are protecting future presidents as well from an undue erosion of their ability to lead the country. It's a matter of principle."
 
Others challenge that view.
 
Klayman, whose group has filed several lawsuits against the administration, says he's fighting "a father-knows-best attitude" from the White House: "If they are doing it on principle, it's the principle of self-preservation and opportunism."


Email This Article





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros