- (Extensions of Remarks - November 16, 2001)
-
- HON. CYNTHIA A. McKINNEY OF GEORGIA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Friday, November 16, 2001
-
- * Mr. Speaker, now I think I've just about seen and heard
everything: Kofi Annan and the United Nations being announced as joint
recipients of this year's Nobel Peace Prize. I'm not saying there wasn't
a time in the UN's history when it wasn't deserved. What I'm saying is
I don't believe it's deserved right now. Instead, I believe that to award
the UN and Kofi Annan now amounts to an insult to the millions that have
died at the hands of the United Nations in recent years.
-
- * Mr. Speaker, Kofi Annan and the United Nations are
stained with the blood of millions of dead people.
-
- * Let me tell you about some of their recent failures.
-
- * Let me start with their greatest failure--Rwanda. The
1994 Rwandan genocide must amount to one of the greatest humanitarian failures
of any generation. Kofi Annan was the Director of UN Peacekeeping based
in New York and was personally responsible for the UN Peace Keeping force
in Rwanda. The now famous informant Jean Pierre had warned Dallaire and
the UN leadership of the coming mass slaughter but his information was
cavalierly dismissed. Tragically, as had been predicted, Rwanda exploded
into an orgy of violence the likes of which the last century had never
seen. At the end of 100 days an estimated 1,000,000 Rwandan men, women,
and children had been bludgeoned, macheted, and axed to death. The daily
death rate was five times that of the Nazi industrial death camps. Instead
of reinforcing the UN contingent in Kigali, the UN actually ordered the
withdrawal of their troops. It was then that the killing in Kigali exploded.
Of course, the US bears much of the blame for the UN's inaction.
-
- * And now the much-celebrated International Tribunal
for Rwanda has become yet another UN bureaucratic disaster. Repeated UN
investigations have found widespread mismanagement, wastage, incompetence,
and corruption. The Tribunal has prosecuted a fraction of the Rwandan genocide
suspects it holds in custody. It has even been criticized by its own Appeal
Court of prosecutorial incompetence and failing to observe elementary due
process considerations. Sadly, the Tribunal, which should have brought
justice to the region, has instead become another multi-million dollar
UN boondoggle. Srebrenica, a name now associated with one of the worst
crimes in Europe since WWII or as Judge Riad of the ICTY described it,
``..... a place where thousands of men were executed, hundreds buried alive,
men and women mutilated and slaughtered, children killed before their mother's
eyes, and a grandfather was forced to eat the liver of his own grandson.''
These are truly scenes from hell written on the darkest pages of human
history. The UN created a safe haven in Srebrenica and encouraged civilians
to enter en masse so as to be under UN military protection. Only one condition
applied--entry into the UN safe haven required Muslim fighters to surrender
their weapons. This they did, hoping that if ever the need arose they would
get them back. They were to be sorely disappointed on that score.
-
- * When it became apparent that General Mladic was separating
the men from the women and then killing them in the nearby fields, the
Dutch UN troops began pleading for UN military support. But, just like
Rwanda, the UN leadership once again became paralyzed and failed. They
dithered over air strikes, they refused to send in troops to help the beleaguered
Dutch and in the end, just as with Rwanda, the UN withdrew their troops.
This permitted General Mladic to remove an estimated 5,000-8,000 Muslims
from in and around the UN compound in Potocari and slaughter them.
-
- * To this day the United Nations and no UN official has
ever been held criminally or civilly liable, let alone even publicly admonished,
for their massive failures in Srebrenica. All the families of the thousands
of victims can do now is pick up the pieces of their broken families and
attempt to restart their lives.
-
- * Mr. Speaker, sadly there is more.
-
- * East Timor. In late August 1999, the UN and now Secretary
General Annan, called for elections on the small island country of East
Timor despite disturbing evidence that hard line elements in the Indonesian
military were preparing to cause wide spread public disorder so as to disrupt
the elections. The UN failed to provide adequate protection for the civilian
population. Dili was burnt to the ground and East Timor was engulfed in
violence. After weeks of killing and millions of dollars of damage, the
Australian government sent in ground troops to restore order to East Timor;
but by then, it was too late to save East Timor from UN bungling.
-
- * Sierra Leone. So bad was the UN's conduct in Sierra
Leone in June 2000 that their long time supporter and friend, Medicins
Sans Frontieres, felt compelled to speak out and complain. MSF complained
bitterly that the UN troops fled a RUF attack on the Sierra Leonean town
of Kabala.
-
- * In so doing MSF said that the UN had failed its mandate
to protect civilian populations, many of whom were sick women and malnourished
children in the MSF hospital.
-
- * Cambodia. There is now mounting evidence that UN Peacekeeping
troops actually caused an explosion of AIDS in Cambodia in 1992. In January
of this year Richard Holbrooke, the then US Ambassador to the UN, launched
an unprecedented attack upon the UN during his last UTN address saying
``..... it would be the cruelest of ironies if people who had come to end
war ..... were spreading the most deadly of diseases ..... it will kill
more people and undermine more societies than even the most critical conflicts
we discuss here.'' And despite Ambassador Holbrooke's warnings there are
concerns that right now in East Timor UN staff could be causing yet another
AIDS epidemic. Some things just never seem to change.
-
- * Mr. Speaker, let me put it squarely on the record.
I believe in the UN. I believe that our country should support the UN.
But I do not think that we should blindly lend our support in the face
of massive negligence.
-
- * I think answers to these questions beg to be asked:
-
- * After such repeated UN failures to act upon knowledge
of impending humanitarian disasters, what forgiveness?
-
- * After such repeated UN failures to discharge their
sacred duties, what accountability?
-
- * After such ongoing complicity by the UN in repeated
slaughters, what punishment?
-
- ___
-
-
- Comment
-
- From Paul Walker
- Subject: McKINNEY: KOFI ANNAN AND UNITED NATIONS ARE
STAINED WITH BLOOD
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 09:48:28
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Apr 2002 09:48:32.0369 (UTC)
- FILETIME=[08FDE610:01C1E5F5]
-
- Maybe someday, even the Democratic Socialists will realize
that the UN was born from bloodshed, benefits from it, feeds on it and
is never going to change that policy as chaos and war just make it stronger
and more dominant. Just a coincidence? No.
-
- That was exactly what the globalists had in mind when
they created it to centralize power and destroy all national boundaries
along with constitutional rights by any Machiavellian means necessary.
All to impose a global New World "Order Through Chaos". That
is why its logo is masonic blue with 33 sections in common with the 33
degrees.
-
- Who thinks that they have the right to dictate to the
masses? The UN. Who benefits from terrorism? The UN. Who is selling sex
slaves in the Balkans? The UN. Who is withholding food from children in
Africa unless they put out sexually? The UN. Who deliberately lets millions
die in wars and genocide? The UN. Who is planning to exterminate the majority
of the human race in a grand ritual sacrifice to Gaia? The UN.
-
- Its not an issue of failure Cynthia. Quite the contrary.
The UN is a smashing success among the masonic globalists. It was born
of evil and it will continue on that path until it is abolished.
|
