Rense.com


Bush Denounces 'Second-Guessing'
Of His Handling Of 911 Intel Data

By Randall Mikkelsen
5-17-2

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush on Friday denounced Democratic "second-guessing" of his handling of intelligence ahead of the Sept. 11 attacks on America, dismissing any suggestion he knew of them in advance but failed to act.
 
The president broke his silence as partisan bickering accelerated two days after revelations he was told in August 2001 of the possibility members of Islamic militant Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network could attempt a hijacking.
 
"Had I known that the enemy was going to use airplanes to kill on that fateful morning, I would have done everything in my power to protect the American people," Bush said.
 
"You know what's interesting about Washington? It's a town, unfortunately, it's the kind of place where second-guessing has become second nature," Bush told U.S. Air Force Academy football team members who were visiting the White House.
 
The White House said earlier this week there was no specific threat of an attack using hijacked planes as weapons against U.S. targets.
 
But a lengthy 1999 report by the research arm of the Library of Congress and commissioned by the CIA envisioned a similar attack by al Qaeda against the U.S. capital.
 
It predicted al Qaeda would retaliate in a "spectacular way" for a U.S. cruise missile attack against its training facilities in Afghanistan in 1998, and said an al Qaeda suicide squad could slam an explosives-packed plane into the Pentagon.
 
The report, long publicly available, prompted new questions on Friday about government awareness of terror methods, but White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said the report was not based on specific intelligence and was rather an attempt to describe the thinking of members of terror groups.
 
The White House also acknowledged on Friday that security officials had prepared a presidential order for a campaign to dismantle al Qaeda. That order did not reach Bush's desk by Sept. 11., officials say.
 
Disclosure of the August warning prompted calls by Democrats and some Republicans for an investigation into intelligence failures ahead of the hijacked-plane attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, which killed about 3,000 people. The attacks were blamed on al Qaeda.
 
First lady Laura Bush, traveling in Hungary, joined in the Republican response. "I think it's sad to play upon the emotions of people as if there were something we could have done to stop it, because that's not the case," she said.
 
HILLARY CLINTON TARGETED
 
The White House named the Democratic leadership in Congress, as well as Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, as among those who had implied Bush failed to act on information that could have prevented the attacks.
 
Fleischer criticized Clinton, the former first lady, for citing a New York newspaper headline he said suggested Bush knew in advance of the September attacks.
 
"I have to say with disappointment that Mrs. Clinton ... followed that headline," he said. Clinton had cited the headline in saying Americans deserved to know about any intelligence lapses, but that she was not blaming Bush.
 
Clinton said on Friday in response to Fleischer's remarks, "I am not looking to point fingers or place blame on anybody."
 
Fleischer said Bush "hopes there won't be any Democrats in the Congress who play politics with this issue."
 
He defended a Republican fund-raising offer of a photograph of Bush on Sept. 11 in exchange for political donations, an issue that has energized Democratic critics. "It's a totally different measure," he said.
 
The White House has also encouraged Republican candidates in this fall's congressional elections to take advantage of Bush's popularity in conducting his "war on terrorism."
 
House of Representatives Democratic leader Richard Gephardt of Missouri said in a written statement, "Our nation is not well-served when the charge of 'partisan politics' is leveled at those who simply seek information the American people need and deserve to know."
 
The proposed order to destroy al Qaeda, which contained plans later used in the U.S.-led attack on Afghanistan, was completed on Sept. 10 but had not reached Bush's desk by the time of the attacks, Fleischer said.
 
The plan was a "comprehensive, multi-front plan to dismantle the al Qaeda," involving military options, actions to cut off financing and working with the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan to topple al Qaeda, he said.
 
Planning against al Qaeda had begun shortly after Bush's election and helped the United States act quickly against the network following the attacks, he said.
 
Some key Democrats were also aware of the possibility of a terrorist attack, Fleischer said. He pointed to remarks by California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein last July in which she said intelligence aides told her of the possibility of a terrorist strike within three months.
 
"I think that raises the question of what did the Democrats in Congress know and why weren't they talking to each other?" Fleischer said.
 
Feinstein responded she had no specific information on an attack and believed that Bush did not either, and said she was "surprised" by the White House tone. "The issue is too important to our nation to engage in the kind of politics Mr. Fleischer is practicing," she said.
 
Gephardt denied any political motivation to the call for a probe and said inquiries into how much warning the government had of the attacks should include members of Congress as well as the White House.
 
"We do not want this to happen again. This is not partisan bickering. We are with the president on the war," he said.





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros