- (AFP) - As the United States prepares to officially withdraw
from the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty, its military is proceeding with
an ambitious program to create a system to shoot down incoming long-range
missiles.
The first step towards the Bush administration's new missile doctrine is
set for Saturday, when Air Force General Ronald Kadish, head of the Missile
Defense Agency, attends a ceremony to break ground on silos for six interceptor
missiles at Fort Greely, Alaska. It is due to be completed by September
2004.
It will be the first time in 30 years that there are no constraints on
Washington's ability to test and deploy systems able to down long-range
enemy missiles.
US President George W. Bush gave notice in December, despite Russian objections,
that the United States would unilaterally withdraw from the treaty signed
in 1972 with the now-defunct Soviet Union forbidding such tests.
While many have regarded the treaty as the cornerstone of arms control
for nearly three decades, Bush has dismissed it as a "relic"
of the Cold War.
Bush, along with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, believes the United
States is vulnerable to long-range missile attack coming from Iran, Iraq
or North Korea, nations that Bush has dubbed the "Axis of Evil."
According to the Pentagon, the Alaska missile site, which would have been
prohibited under the ABM treaty, is mainly a "test bed" enabling
the military to monitor tests in the Pacific.
So far, the Pentagon has successfully shot down four "enemy"
missiles in seven attempts.
US critics of Bush's missile defense plans note the shield would have done
nothing to stop the attacks of September 11 or thwart the detonation of
a radioactive "dirty" bomb in a US city.
Lawmakers, too, are unhappy that contractors developing the military defense
system have been exempted by Rumsfeld from providing Congress with financial
or technical details of their progress or upcoming tests.
Philip Coyle, a senior Pentagon official under president Bill Clinton,
wrote in the Washington Post Tuesday that the program would cost 70 billion
dollars, and more than 200 billion "for the full, layered system planned
by the Bush administration."
The Pentagon "has made a decision that threatens to keep the American
public and Congress in the dark" about the program's progress, he
said.
But Frank Gaffney, president of the Center for Security Policy, countered
in the conservative Washington Times that the ABM treaty was an "insuperable
obstacle to developing and deploying effective protection against missile
attack for the American people."
Gaffney expressed pleasure that the treaty was "formally consigned
to the dust-bin of history."
But Bush's efforts could be stymied at the last minute. On Tuesday, 31
members of Congress filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging his authority
to pull out of the treaty.
The lawsuit filed in US District Court here argues that only Congress can
abrogate international treaties, and accuses Bush of violating the US Constitution.
Critics of Bush's decision to withdraw from the treaty have failed in both
houses of Congress to bring a resolution opposing the move to a vote.
"It is possible that a judge could order a delay," said Pam Bain,
spokeswoman at the Missile Defense Agency. "We have no idea when he
could take a decision."
- Copyright © 2002 AFP. All rights reserved. All information
displayed in this section (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected
by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence
you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any
way commercially exploit any of the contents of this section without the
prior written consent of Agence France-Presses.
|
