Rense.com


Contrails Vs Chemtrails
From KD Weber
wvadreama@sunlitsurf.com
8-13-2

Dear Jeff...
I am hoping you will post this at your website for your millions of enlightened readers! Last week, I sent out a mass email with these two stories:
Nature - Science Update
http://www.nature.com/nsu/020805/020805-7.html
 
CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/08/07/contrails.climate/index.htm
 
They discussed a study of "contrails" affecting our skies. The study utilized data from 9/11, when all airplanes were grounded.
Over the last week, several versions of the news story have also appeared in the mainstream media.  The stories are by different writers or no byline is given. At last count, stories were seen in:
 
The New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/12/science/12CLIM.html
 
MSNBC (which includes pictures of chemtrails, not contrails)
http://www.msnbc.com/news/791321.asp?0si
 
The Associated Press
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-contrail-effect0808aug08.story
 
Chicago Tribune
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-0208080286aug08.story
 
Newsday
http://www.newsday.com/news/health/ny-hsair082814445aug08.story
 
Scientific American
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0001762D-755C-1D51-90FB809EC5880000
 
Environmental News Service
http://ens-news.com/ens/aug2002/2002-08-08-09.asp#anchor4
 
Academic Press
http://www.academicpress.com/inscight/08072002/grapha.htm
 
BBC News - World Edition
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2179845.stm
 
The Herald of Everett Washington
http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/02/8/8/15737459.CFM
 
and other smaller papers carrying the same story from one of the above media outlets. 
The story was also featured on National Public Radio's Morning Edition. My husband and I happened to hear the broadcast when it aired and got queasy listening to it. What a way to start a morning!
http://search.npr.org/cf/cmn/cmnpd01fm.cfm?prgID=3&prgDate=08/08/2002
 
Why the sudden interest in contrails? Especially since this story is essentially another version of the same story that appeared in May 2002, featuring our old "friend" NASA "expert," Patrick Minnis. The story appeared in:
Science News Online
http://www.sciencenews.org/20020511/fob1.asp
 
Science News Magazine
http://www.newswise.com/articles/2002/5/CONTRAIL.SCN.html
 
NASA Earth Observatory
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/Headlines/2002/200205.html
 
Are too many inquiries coming from concerned ailing citizens regarding the strange "contrails" they see over their homes?  
Is this another attempt to debunk chemtrails as we experienced last March 7, 2001 when Traci Watson, for USA Today, reported on "Conspiracy Theories Find Menace in Contrails"?:
http://www.usatoday.com/weather/science/2001-03-07-contrails.htm
The July 21, 2002 "Chemtrails are a Myth" story?:
http://www.sacbee.com/content/politics/story/3665147p-4690977c.html
The June 2, 2002 "Mystery Rash is All in Our Head" story which mentions chemtrails twice, at the beginning and end of the story?: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/02/magazine/02HYSTERIA.html?pagew
anted=7&ei=5038&en=daa8011fe8679b87&ex=1023681600&partner=ASAHI
Is the controlled media feeling the brunt of continued queries from aware citizens demanding accountability? Is this latest barrage an attempt to "handle" us? KEEP UP THE PRESSURE, FOLKS! It's working! Even "bad" press is good!
Your latest "mission," should you choose to accept it, is to write to Professor David Travis at <mailto:travisd@mail.uww.edu>travisd@mail.uww.edu. Professor Travis made these comments in the CNN article referenced above:
"Contrails are denser and block sunlight much more than natural cirrus clouds," said Travis, who conducted the study with Andrew Carleton of Penn State University in University Park, Pennsylvania. They reported the findings this week in the journal Nature.
Please "enlighten" him as to what chemtrails are and how they are affecting you, but do so politely!
Sincerely,
Kim Weber
ohwarriorgoddess@hotmail.com





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros