Rense.com



Pentagon Plane
Still 'Missing' Say Some
Rumor Mill News Agent's Forum
 
The Pentagon Plane Hasn't Been Found At All!
 
Posted By: LeftBehind
Date: Monday, 30 September 2002 5:36 p.m.
 
In Response To:
"Missing" Pentagon Attack Jet Found At Last!
By JoeVialls
9-30-3


Ignoring a whole year of meticulously documented evidence that the Pentagon was NOT hit by a passenger plane, we are now supposed to accept as undeniable PROOF a few still frames from BBC video footage of an airplane flying over some unidentified treetops.
 
The assumption is made that we must necessarily BELIEVE this footage is real, not manufactured, even if there is some identifiable landmark of Washington, D.C. in the background.
 
The assumption is made that even though this footage was originally televised on the BBC to be used as background for THE STATEMENT OF EHUD BARAK which gave MARCHING ORDERS for the U.S. President (and by extension to everyone else on the planet who was 'in the know' about this conspiracy to start a "War On Terror" for the benefit of the bloodthirsty rulers of this world) -- that SOMEHOW WE HAVE NO REASON TO SUSPECT THAT THIS VIDEO FOOTAGE CARRIED A MESSAGE OF LIES AND DECEIT, JUST AS ITS ACCOMPANYING BARAK VOICE-OVER CARRIED A MESSAGE OF LIES AND DECEIT.
 
Of course, it was the BBC just this past weekend which reported there were only "tens of thousands" of demonstrators in the streets of London protesting the IRAQ WAR II. The London police announced a figure of 150,000 people. The news release of the organizers put the figure at 300,000.
 
Who thinks we can trust BBC footage? These are the people who defended the Foot-and-Mouth-Disease animal massacres not too long ago also, by the way. It has now come out that the European Union, for all its faults, has now set out guidelines to prevent that sort of unscientific carnage from ever happening again. But the BBC was right there pointing the finger at some hapless Chinaman who had some mysterious slops behind his restaurant. Racism is such a convenient crutch!
 
Along this line, I want to ask WHERE IS THE JUSTIFICATION for indulging in a phony French accent while stating disagreement with the premises of the French publication, and accusing the authors of cashing in on their theory? This ad hominem mode of attack is repellant, and smacks of jingoism. When this sort of tactic is resorted to in an argument, the basic premises must be very fragile indeed.
 
I am reminded that whatever the reliability in the past of an 'alternative journalist' or 'alternative news source', EVERY NEW STORY must be judged on its own merits.
 
Admittedly, I am not an expert on the "PENTAGON PLANE STORY," but THERE IS A REASON WHY THERE IS SO MUCH IN-FIGHTING ABOUT THAT PARTICULAR EXPLOSION...
 
This is the whole coverup's weakest link!!!
 
NOT ONLY because of the problems with the damage done by the explosion.
 
The real HORROR BEGAN with the emergency fire crews who were PREVENTED FROM SAVING THE LIVES OF SURVIVORS; and the F.B.I. agents who put the premises off-limits to personnel from the Office of Naval Intelligence; and the 'official' autopsies of the victims, signed off by the SAME MEDICAL FRANKENSTEINS who hid the grotesque physical evidence of cold-blooded, hi-tech mass murder at WACO so very, very well.
 
Don't let anyone tell you the story ends here.
 
http://www.public-action.com
 
 
Comment
 
From Otto Grecz
10-1-2
 
I am an Aircraft Maintenance Technician and worked both in the manufacturing sector and overhaul/maintenance,
including the manufacturing of DC - 9 and DC - 10 wings and various sections of these aircraft.
 
I would like to add the following:
 
An aircraft the size of a Boeing 757 will have large pieces of fuselage, wings, engines, landing gear scattered at the site of an impact, along with seats and luggage - not to mention dead bodies and body parts.
 
None of that was evident at the Pentagon lawn, which by the way, remained after the "attack" in remarkably good condition.
 
Who were the passengers on Flight 77 and how many? - I don't recall seeing a list anywhere.
 
Also as suggested in the "Flight 77 Death Dive ..." article, the aircraft diving steep into the Pentagon, that contradicts
previous pictures where the aircraft was flying flat at ground level before impacting the building.
 
There certainly must be a cover-up, whatever hit the Pentagon wasn't near the size of a 757, rather more like the size of a Lear Jet or a fighter plane.
The whole thing smells like a rotting fish, there must be persons in the government and the military who are hiding crucial information and should be hung treason and murder.
 
Otto Grecz
Vancouver, BC Canada






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros