Rense.com



Earthquake Information
Being Swept Under the Rug

From Sherwood Ensey
tuatha@cybermesa.com
11-4-2

Comment
 
From Jim
JTR_IV@hotmail.com
11-5-2
 
Mr. Rense,
 
On November 4th your site published an article from Sherwood Ensey regarding earthquakes and a cover-up by the USGS. Everything in this report is incorrect.
 
Sherwood Ensey was basing this article on the Swiss earthquake page that uses raw, unconfirmed reports. http://seismo.ethz.ch/redpuma/redpuma_ami_list.html
 
There are disclaimers all over site. The primary disclaimer reads: http://seismo.ethz.ch/redpuma/redpuma_disclaimer.html
 
Please note!
 
This page is intended for seismologists at the various observatories. Its interpretation is not always easy and you may draw wrong conclusions by just reading the information as it appears here. Specifically, both locations and magnitude values can be substantially wrong even within an event group. This is often the case for automatic locations, but may as well be for manual locations, depending on the geometry of the recording network and the earthquake.
 
Please understand, that unfortunately we cannot answer any questions regarding this page by phone.
 
Further information about the concept of RedPuma can be found on and below the main RedPuma web-page with the URL http://seismo.ethz.ch/redpuma .
 
A good web-page to view the recent seismicity is the one provided by the NEIC in Golden, Colorado: http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/bulletin.html
 
____________
 
 
 
Despite these disclaimers, Mr. Ensey tried to interpret the data and failed miserably. His earthquakes are all listed, but he took incorrect wrong data and jumped to the conspiracy conclusion.
 
For example his 7.1 Malay Peninsula quake and his 6.6 Afghanistan earthquake are grouped together with the 7.7 in Northern Sumatera, Indonesia and all happened at the same time. The site he references even says that readings grouped together are a single seismic event. The Sumatera quake is listed on the USGS site and has been in the news.
 
His Vanuatu Islands quake is recorded on the USGS site even though he claims it is not. It is listed as a 5.1 quake and Tuatha seems to ignore the fact that 3 of the 5 readings for the Vanuatu quake were in the 5 range.
 
Mr. Ensey has a reputation for putting out bad information based on his incorrect understanding of a variety of sources. His earthchanges group is heavily moderated so that people cannot point out his flawed information. Mr. Ensey is attempting to support the Mark Hazlewood Planet X scam.
 
Jim http://www.planet-x.150m.com
 
_____



Hello Jeff...
 
Here is some more earthquake information that happened within the last few days you may find to be of as great an interest as the Ascension Island earthquake that I sent to you earlier. I own and moderate a worldwide discussion group, as well as publish material related to the Earth Changes.
 
Sherwood Ensey
 
********* \\
 
Earthquake Information Being Swept Under the Rug
 
Here is a powerful/massive 7.1 magnitude earthquake that happened over the weekend, which I did not find on the USGS list. Guess the USGS simply overlooked it. 02Nov2002 01:26 HRS UT 7.1 MALAY PENINSULA Location: 6.7N 102.1E
 
Here is a powerful 6.6 magnitude earthquake that happened over the weekend, which I did not find on the USGS list. Guess the USGS was asleep when this one happened. 02Nov2002 01:27 HRS UT 6.6 AFGHANISTAN-TAJIKISTAN BORDER Location: 36.2N 71.5E
 
Here is a powerful/massive 7.7 magnitude earthquake that happened on Friday, which I did not find on the USGS list. Guess the USGS simply overlooked this one too. 01Nov2002 13:41 HRS UT 7.7 VANUATU ISLANDS Location: 17.8S 166.5E
 
6+ List and Waveforms http://seismo.ethz.ch/redpuma/redpuma_plus6_list.html
 
More and more proof is mounting that the USGS, like NASA and many other US government agencies, are simply sweeping data under the rug in hopes the public, and especially the mainstream media will not see the information.
 
Anyone beginning to feel like a mushroom yet? [For those that are not aware - this is a joke about mushrooms that are grown in the dark and fed poop - crap - excretment.]
 
The funny thing here, and it really is funny [at least from my perspective], is that the biggest mushrooms are the mainstream media here in the US. What an insult to the time honored institution of Freedom of the Press and journalism.
 
Anyone that would like to forward this, and the information on the Ascension Island earthquake to the mass media, is more than welcome to do so.
 
 
Comment
 
Did An Unprecedented Earthqauke Event Just Happen?
 
From Sherwood Ensey
tuatha@cybermesa.com
11-8-2
 
The following earthquakes happened on November 2, 2002, ALL within a minute
of each other, and occurred at a Latitude ranging from 2.997 North to 36.2
North, and a Longitude ranging from 71.5 East to 102 East, and occurred at a
depth ranging from 10 Km to 33 Km. The area encompassed tens of thousands of
square miles - significantly larger than the 7.9 Alaska earthquake on
November 3. In fact, if according to the calculations just given to me by a
close friend that lives nearby are correct, the area these earthquakes
involved covers an area equal in size or just a little smaller than the
total land mass of China. Imagine for a moment if you will, an earthquake of
that size, and the distinct possibility of an entire piece of the Earth that
size shaking and moving all at once. It may very well of happened.
 
Data for the earthquakes involved:
 
Date & Time: 02Nov2002 01:27:42.3 HRS UT
Latitude & Longitude Location: 36.2N 71.5E
Depth: 10 Km
Magnitude: 5.4
Regional Location: AFGHANISTAN-TAJIKISTAN BOR
Reporting Service: Redpuma Seismic, Switzerland
http://seismo.ethz.ch/redpuma/redpuma_plus6_list.html
 
Date & Time: 02Nov2002 01:27:42.3 HRS UT
Latitude & Longitude Location: 36.2N 71.5E
Depth: 10 Km
Magnitude: 6.6
Regional Location: AFGHANISTAN-TAJIKISTAN BOR
Reporting Service: Redpuma Seismic, Switzerland
http://seismo.ethz.ch/redpuma/redpuma_plus6_list.html
 
Date & Time: 02Nov2002 01:26:02.9 HRS UT
Latitude & Longitude Location: 6.7N 102.1E
Depth: 10 Km
Magnitude: 7.1
Regional Location: MALAY PENINSULA
Reporting Service: Redpuma Seismic, Switzerland
http://seismo.ethz.ch/redpuma/redpuma_plus6_list.html
 
Date & Time: 2002/11/02 01:26:11.5
Latitude & Longitude Location: 2.997N 96.082E
Depth: 33 Km
Magnitude: 7.7
Regional Location: NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA
Reporting Service: United States Geological Service, USA
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/
 
Date & Time: 2002/11/02 01:27:27.5
Latitude & Longitude Location: 35.758N 74.469E
Depth: 33 Km
Magnitude 5.3
Regional Location: NORTHWESTERN KASHMIR
Reporting Service: United States Geological Service, USA
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/
 
This is what I originally wrote, and got blasted from Jim for, in what
appeared to be an overly critical and seemingly biased manner. The details
in the following part of this report are far more important than Jim's views
of me.
 
"Here is a powerful/massive 7.1 magnitude earthquake that happened over the
weekend, which I did not find on the USGS list. Guess the USGS simply
overlooked it.
02Nov2002 01:26 HRS UT 7.1 MALAY PENINSULA
Location: 6.7N 102.1E
 
Here is a powerful 6.6 magnitude earthquake that happened over the weekend,
which I did not find on the USGS list. Guess the USGS was asleep when this
one happened.
02Nov2002 01:27 HRS UT 6.6 AFGHANISTAN-TAJIKISTAN BORDER
Location: 36.2N 71.5E"
 
I was merely trying to make a simple point that the earthquakes, which were
widely distributed by geographic location and being reported by "Redpuma," a
Swiss Seismic service, were not listed by the USGS, and at the time I wrote
my brief article I had not yet correlated and compiled the additional
earthquake data [above] you see. My intent and point with my original
article, was that some earthquakes were either not being reported, and/or
were being under-reported by the USGS; a situation that in my estimation
still exists, as is the case with the earthquake that struck the Ascension
Island region - an earthquake which still remains a mystery.
 
Updated details on the Ascension Island earthquake:
 
Date & Time: 03Nov2002 22:42:31.1
Latitude & Longitude Location: 5.5S 12.0W
Depth: 10 Km
Magnitude: 6.1
Regional Location: Ascension Island Region
Reporting Service: SED, Switzerland
http://www.emsc-csem.org/cgi-bin/ALERT_datafile.sh?C9151&SED
 
As you may or may not see, I was merely doing the job any responsible
journalist and researcher would do, by reporting that some earthquakes were
and are not being reported, or are being under-reported by the USGS.
Apparently the earthquakes I was reporting on, which were not being reported
by the USGS, was because the addition of these 'other' earthquakes to the
USGS site would have immediately aroused suspicion as to the EXTENSIVE size
and FULL EXTENT of this massive earthquake, if indeed it was just one single
earthquake event rather than several earthquake events happening at the same
time. Due to the vast miles between geographic locations, Latitude and
Longitudinally speaking, where the earthquakes struck, I was looking at the
earthquakes as separate events, which they most certainly appeared to be at
the time, again, and I must stress, because of the vastness of miles between
the earthquakes.
 
AFGHANISTAN to SUMATRA
 
Afghanistan to Sumatra, at the different Latitudes and Longitudes shown and
that I have presented in this report, covers a lot of ground, and seismic
waves moving through the Earth don't cover that much ground in one minute,
unless of course it is either one massive and unprecedented earthquake
event, unlike an event we have never before seen and witnessed in modern
history [the 1964 Alaska earthquake may have come close], or the earthquake
was actually several events in different locations all at once. Jim's post
indicates they were all one event: "For example his 7.1 Malay Peninsula
quake and his 6.6 Afghanistan earthquake are grouped together with the 7.7
in Northern Sumatera, Indonesia and all happened at the same time. The site
he references even says that readings grouped together are a single seismic
event." If that statement is true, then Jim, and the sites in question, have
all possibly admitted to an Earth shattering single earthquake event never
before seen in the recollections of modern recorded history. This is a very
good reason for the USGS not to have reported on the other earthquakes. The
people deserve the right to have this information and to see it, even if it
was made through an error in judgment on the part of Jim and the seismic
services in question. Maybe we can get at the truth; whether it was one
event or several.
 
Jim in his blind zealously to trash what I wrote and to personally bash me
in his ongoing campaign of trashing and bashing all those associated with
bringing forward critical information about the Earth Changes issues, Jim
may have very well given away some important and crucial information about
one of, if not the largest, single earthquake events this planet has seen
since earthquake records started being kept.
 
And just to think - all I was trying to do was to report on a few measly
earthquakes that were not being reported, or being under-reported by the
USGS. Thanks to Jim, and his incessant and persistent desire to trash and
bash others, rather than to present the facts as they actually are, Jim may
have very well given us all a gigantic puzzle piece in the continuing Earth
Changes saga.
 
Sherwood Ensey
Chimayo, New Mexico
tuatha@cybermesa.com
 
End of Rebuttal







MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros