- SenderBerl: The reason we have been prolific in our writings
is because we are certain than any attack on Iraq by President Bush for
true agenda being served, will change the future to a dire course. It should
at this time be apparent to everyone, that if the US attacks, Osama and
ultimately the rest of the Muslim world will target the West with bioterrorism.
This is opening a gateway which should not be opened.
-
- The propaganda starting to come out of the US is self
defeating. Every Iraqi and Muslim in the world by now knows the Bush agenda,
not by interpretation but by admission.
-
- Let us first analyze an excerpt from a story just coming
off the news wire:
-
- Blair, America's staunchest ally, broadcast a message
into Iraq saying "The standard of living and prosperity of the Iraqi
people would be infinitely greater were Saddam not there.''
-
- SenderBerl: Is this really for the Iraqis or for the
ignorant of the world? What is the nexus to 500,000 children dying since
1992? To Iraqis being denied good and services available before the last
war?
-
- The prime minister hoped his message would reach Saddam,
the Iraqi people "and the wider Arab world,'' his spokesman said in
London. It was broadcast Thursday by the Arabic service of Radio Monte
Carlo - the most popular shortwave station reaching Iraq.
-
- "One of the reasons I wanted to speak to you today
is to communicate with people directly, because what happens in a situation
like this is that there are myths that grow up,'' Blair said. "I have
just dealt with one myth, that this is about Christians versus Muslims
- it isn't - or is about the West versus the Arab world, or it's about
oil.''
-
- SenderBerl: While the text was written to be heard, the
failure to deny the last two elements stands out in the written text.
-
- Blair said Saddam's regime was "brutal and oppressive,''
and if he didn't disarm, "the weapons will be disarmed by force.''
-
- SenderBerl: Regrettably, there are even more brutal and
oppressive regimes in existence than Saddam's. There are 15 million people
subject to starvation in Angola. There are terrible injustices being waged
in many countries. There are nuclear weapons in the hands of North Korea.
Moreover, we do not believe that Saddam has much if any WMD; he no doubt
made arrangements for the response through surrogates, intending to perfectly
comply with UN inspectors. That is why the US is desperate to launch as
soon as possible. Bush wants to attack, he doesn't care two bits about
WMD, but about settling the score with Saddam and walking off with the
known spoils of war.
-
- On the streets of Baghdad, however, ordinary Iraqis expressed
concern the Americans were bent on a military showdown regardless of whether
their government cooperated with the U.N. inspectors.
-
- SenderBerl: Does anyone believe that they are wrong in
thinking as they do?
-
- End Excerpt
-
- SenderBerl: To our minds, the attack on Iraq is dynamically
similar to Barak wanting to hand over the West Bank and Jerusalem. The
US and Israel are not going to achieve success with secular designs furthering
distancing themselves and others from G-d. No one including Clinton could
fathom the result when Arafat turned down the Barak gift. Now, we hear
from similar quarters that those in the know think it will be over in a
single day. This type of David-Goliath thinking is further supportive of
the critical times we are in, where the mighty can fall when those on the
singular secular dimension cannot perceive any other result.
-
- A very valued reader of our material noted to us that
Sharon has CONFIRMED our long held interpretation about the terrorism's
true target - the Israeli economy to wit: seeking that Israel succumb when
it's economy falls apart, causing division and disillusionment among the
people of Israel. We noted this very dynamic with the Montgomery County
snipers, in that fourteen bullets took down the Washington area economy
for weeks, a message overlooked by most people, who only looked at what
they were seeing from a single dimension.
-
- Our valued reader wrote:
-
- This confirms what you have been saying about Israel's
economy not because it is just or morally correct...no...because:
-
- "I want to arrive at an arrangement with the Palestinians,
because that will be the only solution to Israel's ailing economy,"
Sharon said.
-
- Sharon Admits A Palestinian State Is Already An Established
Fact
-
- By Gil Hoffman Jerusalem Post Nov. 14, 2002
-
- Risking the wrath of the Likud members who will decide
the party's leadership race, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said Wednesday
that he considers a Palestinian state an established fact.
-
- "When you look, you see that all the government
structures already exist," Sharon said in an interview on Channel
2.
-
- "The Palestinians have ministers, they have a cabinet,
and they have a president. They also have 104 states acknowledging their
right to statehood, even before they declare it."
-
- Sharon was replying to interviewer Dan Shilon's question
about whether he thought the establishment of a Palestinian state is inevitable.
Sharon said that once terror ends, he is confident an agreement can be
reached with the Palestinians to end the conflict. To do so, he said, he
is willing to make diplomatic concessions, but not such that national security
would be compromised.
-
- "I want to arrive at an arrangement with the Palestinians,
because that will be the only solution to Israel's ailing economy,"
Sharon said.
-
- "A diplomatic agreement that brings peace is the
real answer to the economic situation."
-
- Responding to Foreign Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's call
to expel Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat, Sharon said the
matter has been raised several times and the security establishment decided
not to take such a step, because the harm would outweigh the good.
-
- Netanyahu declined to respond to Sharon's statements.
-
- Sharon said that polls that have shown him with a hefty
lead over Netanyahu are indicators of the public's support, but that the
November 28 primary will be the true test. Asked to respond to Netanyahu's
call to him to be his second in command if he loses the race, Sharon said
the question is irrelevant, because he intends to win.
-
- Although he said he wants a wide coalition, Sharon revealed
for the first time that he does not intend to appoint as many ministers.
"There will not be a government of this size again; it will be much
smaller," he said.
-
- Asked about his age, 74, Sharon said it is not a matter
of concern.
-
- "If I had any doubt that everything [in my health]
is all right and holding together as necessary, I would be doing different
things," he said. "As long as I am feeling all right, there are
many problems still ahead that require good judgment, and the public knows
whom it can trust."
-
- http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/A/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1037183089791
-
-
- Conclusion: Is war with Iraq now unavoidable? It seems
so which suggests that President Bush will be sent a very devastating message
in the near future. Blair spitting forth ridiculous propaganda only puts
the focus on England, and perhaps the NWO pawn and poodle has been set
up to capture Osama's attention to make England not the US the target.
SenderBerl continues to advise against visiting Las Vegas. There is a massive
computer convention scheduled there in the near future. We always believed
that Las Vegas was highly vulnerable to terrorism.
|
