- Initial reports said Palestinian gunmen brazenly fired
on Jewish worshipers in Hebron. The reports were wrong -- but the U.S.
media has yet to correct them...
-
-
- Nov. 19, 2002 | The headlines over the weekend were
startling, even for the Middle East, where the Israeli-Palestinian war
seems trapped in escalating cycles of violence. On Friday evening in the
predominantly Palestinian city of Hebron, gunmen hiding in houses and olive
groves ambushed Jewish worshipers as they walked home from Sabbath prayers,
spraying them with gunfire and even tossing grenades into the unarmed crowd.
Israeli soldiers, who escort the worshipers every Friday night, rushed
into a dark dead-end alley to try to help. After a four-hour gun battle,
12 Israelis were dead. Government officials, led by the hard-line foreign
minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, quickly dubbed it the "Sabbath Massacre."
-
- The gun battle was alarming -- and made headlines worldwide
-- not only because Israel's military suffered its heaviest one-day loss
in years but also because of the demented idea that gunmen would open fire
on unarmed worshipers as they walked home from prayer.
-
- No doubt that's what provoked outrage from Pope John
Paul II, who expressed anger over the "vile attack, just as people
had finished praying." Also, United Nations Secretary-General Kofi
Annan leveled one of his strongest attacks against Palestinians and the
"despicable terrorist attack that killed Jewish worshipers on their
way to the Sabbath Eve prayers."
-
- The American press rushed to report the gruesome details.
"Ambush: 12 Israelis Murdered at Prayer," read the New York Post's
Saturday banner headline. According to the Post news account, "The
attack began when Palestinian snipers hiding in houses fired automatic
weapons and tossed grenades at dozens of Jews on their way to one of Judaism's
holiest sites."
-
- The New York Times, citing Israeli army officials, reported
that "Palestinian snipers ambushed Jewish settlers walking home from
Sabbath prayers." So, among others, did the Boston Globe: "Militants
ambushed a group of settlers." So did Newsday: "Palestinian gunmen
in the West Bank city of Hebron ambushed Jewish settlers."
- It's now clear that none of those initial press reports
from Hebron were accurate. In truth, Jewish worshipers returning home were
not fired upon by Palestinian gunmen, who instead waited until the civilians
were behind settlement gates before they started shooting at Israeli soldiers.
None of the worshipers died. The 12 Israelis killed were security guards
and soldiers. Three Palestinian gunmen were also killed.
-
- It's one thing if the early, erroneous press accounts
simply reflected confusion surrounding a chaotic event like an ambush.
But over a three-day period, American news outlets had a chance to correct
or at least clarify what happened in Hebron, but few of them did.
-
- With a dozen Israelis dead, the distinction between who
the Palestinian gunmen shot at may seem trivial. But there is an important
difference, particularly in how the world sees the conflict, between opening
fire on unarmed worshipers and targeting trained soldiers, who many Palestinians
see as part of an illegal occupying force. It's crucial that the press
be able to make clear distinctions between armed combat and acts of terrorism
against civilians, especially as the United States leads a global war on
terrorism.
-
- What became clear by Saturday in Israel was that the
ambush did not occur as originally described by government officials. Or
as described by one self-professed witness who phoned Israel's Army Radio
and, in a live interview, insisted "the group of Jews were slaughtered."
His early, vivid accounts lent credence to the idea of a civilian massacre.
On Monday, however, the man admitted that he'd been in Tel Aviv during
the Hebron attack and had misled the media with his phony accounts.
-
- Even before the man's arrest, Amos Harel, writing Sunday
in the Israeli daily Ha'aretz, declared: "What happened in Hebron
on Friday night was not a 'massacre,' nor was it an attack on 'peaceful
Jewish worshippers' returning from prayers. The attack actually began several
minutes after all of the worshippers had already returned safely. Those
killed Friday were killed in combat. All of the victims were armed fighters,
who were more or less trained."
-
- The Jerusalem Post reported that the first ambush shots
did not ring out until after the "all clear" had sounded on the
soldiers' radios, "meaning worshipers had been safely escorted to
their homes after Shabbat prayers." Speaking with the Israeli press,
Matan Vilnai, a former Israeli general, told reporters over the weekend:
"It wasn't a massacre, it was a battle."
-
- And in Sunday's Washington Post, which was virtually
alone in putting the Hebron events in perspective for U.S. news consumers,
the paper quoted the leader of the Israeli settlement in Hebron, who explained
civilians were not targeted in the alley gun battle: "It was a pure
military event. The worshipers had passed a quarter of an hour before."
-
- Yet many news organizations failed to clarify that point.
On Saturday, the Los Angles Times reported that "Palestinian gunmen
ambushed Jewish settlers." In its follow-up story on Sunday, when
it was clear the paper's original dispatch was not accurate, the Times
ignored any mention of settlers being attacked -- or not being attacked
-- in the Hebron battle.
-
- Again and again that pattern was repeated over the weekend,
as newspapers ignored or obfuscated the facts. After telling readers in
its Saturday headline that 12 Israelis had been "murdered in prayer,"
the New York Post blurred the facts on Sunday, referring vaguely to Israelis
(meaning soldiers) being ambushed.
-
- In Saturday's edition, the Boston Globe reported in the
first sentence of its article that "Palestinian gunmen killed 12 Israelis
and wounded 15 in an attack yesterday on worshipers." In Sunday's
editions, the Globe mentioned obliquely that "no civilian worshipers
were among the casualties," without spelling out that the settlers
mentioned in Saturday's editions were never attacked.
-
- Even the New York Times, which probably allocates more
resources to covering the Middle East than any other newspaper, seemed
confused about the events in Hebron -- either that, or it was unwilling
to correct its initial mistake. Like every other outlet, the paper first
followed the lead of Israeli government officials and reported that worshipers
had been ambushed. On Sunday the Times, still citing the Israeli army's
version of events, wrote the attack was "a carefully planned assault
on Jewish settlers" and went into detail about how the ambush was
triggered by passing worshipers.
-
- It was not until Monday that the Times, in the 11th paragraph
of its third Hebron ambush story, finally explained to readers: "The
Israeli Army initially said the attack was on Jewish worshipers, but it
appears to have been directed at security forces who guard settlers."
-
- Even then, the newspaper did not pursue the question
of whether members of the Israeli government purposely misled reporters
about the ambush for political gain.
-
- It's worth noting that the first reports of a so-called
civilian massacre originated from the office of Netanyahu, Israel's newly
appointed foreign minister. On Friday night, his spokesman told reporters
that Jewish worshipers on their way to prayers were brutally attacked and
murdered by Palestinian terrorists.
-
- The former leader of the right-wing Likud Party, Netanyahu
recently joined Ariel Sharon's coalition government, but he will challenge
Sharon for the prime minister's post in the January elections. It's possible
that, by initially hyping the attack as the "Sabbath Massacre,"
Netanyahu was trying to pressure Sharon to drive Palestinian leader Yasser
Arafat into exile, a provocative move Netanyahu has been advocating for
months. Sharon didn't do that -- but in what some observers see as a concession
to Netanyahu's far-right conservative challenge, he did approve the creation
of additional, and controversial, Jewish settlements in Hebron following
the ambush.
-
- No doubt the initial, false claims that Palestinians
massacred worshipers helped ease the way for that move. All the more reason
the press should be asking pointed questions about Hebron
-
-
- FAIR USE NOTICE
-
- This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use'
of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the
US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material
on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed
a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
-
-
-
- http://www.ccmep.org/2002_articles/Israel-Palestine/111902_manufacturing_a_massacre.htm
|
