- There is a conflict between two perceptions of reality.
We will deal with these two perceptions in as succinct fashion as we can
muster from the planes of Israel, China and the U.S.
-
- Israel: Current Israel reality includes seeing that Oslo
failed in every dimension. Moreover, there is the understanding that Oslo
was nothing more than a set up to platform Israel's own destruction. These
two conclusions now coming to the forefront, Israel's solution is to play
along with Bush (N.W.O.) and take out Iraq, Syria and Iran while making
sure it survives. In this regard, it wants to be in the vanguard of the
attack with Bush, thinking that quick success best guarantees Israel's
survival.
-
- One can immediately see that the above perception is
secular and is totally devoid of G-d but imbued with logic and reason.
-
- The other reality involves seeing that Oslo set in motion
Israel's biblical course because it failed since 1967 to instill love of
G-d into the Jewish people in the Land of Israel. We saw Oslo before there
was Oslo because as early as 1984 we set forth the proposition that G-d
might mock Israel's failure since 1967 by having Israel voluntarily hand
it back. Thus, when Oslo arose, it was no surprise to us, and we knew its
true agenda and course, when Israel operated as a state putting its trust
in man over G-d. Moreover, with Oslo Israel became a puppet state to the
new world order leadership, today's Pharaoh. When Rabin was murdered, it
triggered the sequence of Barak formally handing it back, Barak leaving
Jewish troops to die in the field in giving up Jewish holy sites, the global
desecration of G-d's Name to the world with his stated secularization plans,
all with passivity and perceived indifference by the entire global Jewish
leadership: resulting in the dire straits seen today in Israel.
-
- Thus, while Israel currently sees teaming up with Bush
and winning with Bush as the ticket to a good future, we see massive death
and devastation and the final act in this theater of pathos. Our reality
sees the simple solution of Israel recognizing what we said above, honoring
its Torah, its heritage, the beliefs of prior generations all the way to
the forefathers, and undertaking a course of proffering Israel as a nation
which exists to honor G-d. From our perception of reality, we need not
rely on man nor logic or reason. Such simple course resolves the problems
and platforms a continued future for good.
-
- We await the outcome of which version of reality will
be pursued, the consequences speaking as to which version was correct.
-
- China: Current N.W.O. reality sees a country that will
never give up all that it has due to the grandiose ness of the US. China
has built futuristic advance infrastructure on the compelled sacrifices
of the American people and its government, allowing China to see itself
as the leading world economic juggernaut into the foreseeable future. The
only thing that can undermine it is if China wants to counter N.W.O. efforts
for one world government. Thus, China will not risk to lose what it has
gained, and will allow Bush to pursue the N.W.O. course is the Middle East
which it declares to China is to undermine religious fundamentalism. China
as a godless country always confirmed its understanding of the need to
eradicate religious fundamentalism with its derivative problems.
-
- Our perception of reality is that China would reveal
itself as formally opposed to the N.W.O. agenda after it received entry
into the W.T.O. We were correct, it even giving such indication prior thereto,
seeing if Bush was going to intercede and stop its W.T.O. admission, driving
China into a formal conflict position with the US. Now, we have explained
as a matter of record its declaration in metaphor format through the movie
The Emperor and the Assassin that China will oppose the N.W.O. agenda.
Moreover, we have proffered that the West Nile Virus that was discovered
in the US in August 1999, to our minds is a result of the Chinese Embassy
bombing in May 1999. Moreover, Bush's National Security Strategy formally
confirmed China's expressed concerns. This secular perspective is further
clarified and buttressed by the religious perspective that China as the
godless nation will in fact assume world supremacy and undermine Israel
and the US as punishment for both following agendas distancing and intending
to remo
- We await the outcome of which version of reality will
prove correct.
-
- United States: Bush's reality is that he de facto at
this point controls the Executive, the Congress and the Supreme Court.
He also has full legal powers to do just about anything he wants without
the need for approval from anyone else. Thus, due to debts to the oil cartel
group, and allegiance to his father's commitment to the N.W.O., which he
now endorses in any event himself, he is out to capture Middle Eastern
oil and oil reserves. Only with this asset can the N.W.O. offset China's
expressed intent not to be a N.W.O. player, now that it has received entry
into the WTO and otherwise has expressed its reason for not participating
in it (The Emperor and the Assassin). Thus, Bush's reality is that he has
to move now to do it, and then all he has to do later is take care of those
whining about what he did. However, since he's in the driver's seat, one
by one he will dispose of the whining, but the N.W.O. will be in technical
global control. Give the N.W.O. five to ten years in a prosperous China
(think of Japa
- Our perception of reality is that the move to capture
and control Middle Eastern oil will be the defining moment in the future
course and it will not result in Bush's well planned and supported secular
vision for N.W.O. one world government world control and confiscation.
It was with interest we noted Bush's approval of a formal 9-11 investigation,
even with N.W.O. poodle Kissinger at the helm. Mr. China will of course
assure that nothing gets in the way of the N.W.O. agenda. However, the
very fact that the families of the 9-11 victims mustered enough clout and
effort to get what a reluctant Bush wanted sandbagged is revealing. Thus,
we see that the investigation opens a door, the only door, to undermine
at this point Emperor Bush, because his complicity in 9-11 is a matter
to our minds beyond a reasonable doubt. We explain below. However, regardless,
our perception of reality is that G-d gave the Arab/Islamic nations the
oil, and whether Bush or anyone else likes it or not, no one under an agenda
to remove G
- We await the outcome of which version of reality will
prove correct.
-
- Here in addition to the interrogatories we prepared showing
the dynamics in play regarding Bush is our perception of why Bush's complicity
is beyond a reasonable doubt. It depresses us to admit it to ourselves
for when a culture under monotheism stands able to allow over 2,500 innocents
to die to platform required moral outrage, that government will be punished
by G-d. We have gone through a maze of thoughts on it, and asked why not
the same expression for a government which stood passive to what was it
500,000 or 1,500,000 innocent children and/or people dying as the result
of oppressive sanctions? When a government can turn on its own people,
it automatically and inherently represents evil of the highest degree and
magnitude. We know that one day these people will declare we sacrificed
a couple of thousand of innocents to spare millions, many millions of innocents.
We are sorry but that excuse and rationalization doesn't wash to us. There
was another course, and there is always another course, before sacrif
- Now as to this 9-11 investigation concerning Bush, let
us tell you why we have concluded that a. Bush had advance knowledge and
b. let the 9-11 attacks happen in summary format based on all else we have
previously expounded upon:
-
- First, a competent prosecutor could readily show a high
standard malfeasance on the part of the President in not delaying if not
canceling his publicity appearance at an elementary school.
-
- Before he walked into that classroom, there were a number
of planes not only hijacked but one had already struck the north World
Trade Center tower.
-
- Only the President of the United States could authorize
military jets to shoot down a commercial aircraft.
-
- Moreover, the situation could have arisen where a military
aircraft was in position to impede the hijacked aircraft in a manner putting
the commercial aircraft at serious risk.
-
- All these options required executive decisions.
-
- His job and duty was not only to be available but at
the safest and most able place and point to render timely decisions.
-
- The President's decision was to sit with elementary school
children making him dynamically inaccessible while the country was at risk
and in jeopardy.
-
- Second, a competent prosecutor would show the material
breaches of established protocol in situations where the country is under
attack.
-
- Andrew Card told the President that "America is
under attack," and the President's decision was to compound the already
seen malfeasance by continuing to sit with children.
-
- There was no inquiry by the President from Card as to
damage, whether any nuclear or botoxin device was deployed, or whether
he was needed (he was needed on Air Force One before he even sat down with
the school children).
-
- However, the government's complicity in 9-11 is evidenced
by the failure under an America under attack scenario to protect the President.
-
- The mission of the Secret Service is to protect the President
regardless of his political desires otherwise. Consequently, claims that
he didn't want to frighten the children do not wash, when it is not only
proven that the Secret Service did not act to protect the President under
an America is under attack scenario but that the President remained in
a high risk area giving remarks broadcast nationally about the attacks
on the World Trade Center buildings, knowing there were still hijacked
jets in the skies and further not knowing the full breadth and scope of
the terrorist plan. His location was a matter of public knowledge as to
both time and place.
-
- The only explanation for such conduct is that the government
knew of the nature and scope of the terrorism in play that day.
-
- The evidence leads as President Bush himself suggests
to himself.
-
- Without question, putting himself in front of a bunch
of elementary school children when executive decisions were needed not
only jeopardized this country but also from the proof above platformed
that it was an executive decision to let the planes reach their New York
City targets. Moreover, while not up to the same standard, it would be
remiss to fail to note that the buildings were taken down because of explosives
planted internally at the World Trade Center buildings.
-
- Third, a competent prosecutor could establish guilt without
the need for a signed confession from President Bush.
-
- If you asked the President would he have gone into the
classroom if the first plane were laden with a nuclear device, the answer
can only be "No."
-
- The reason it would be "No" is because it would
be evident that the first strike was a terrorist strike with deep ramifications.
If he went into the classroom, made himself scarce, and otherwise acted
as though he was immune from what was happening, people could only conclude
that he didn't care and knew that he was risk free and indifferent to consequences.
He surely was not acting to preclude a second similar strike. The only
conclusion is that the President was allowing it to happen.
-
- Now, in what did take place, the same formal level of
terrorism as above was reached automatically when a second plane, known
to be off transponder and hijacked by the FAA by 9:00 AM, strikes the second
tower.
-
- We have terrorism and as Andrew Card stated: "America
is under attack."
-
- The only difference then between the nuclear scenario
above and the current one is that the first and second planes did not carry
any nuclear payload.
-
- However, there is no reason to assume that the third
and fourth planes in issue that day, still not resolved, do not carry a
suitcase nuclear bomb or biotoxins on board.
-
- Thus, the fact that no nuclear device was discharged
at that point of time does not alter the dynamics in the behavior of the
President. He cannot discount, unless he has advance knowledge, that the
terrorism that day may yet involve a. a nuclear device and/or b. that he
personally would be a target of the terrorists' plans.
-
- If his behavior reflects sheer stupidity, he is unfit
for office. He is the only person assigned serious responsibilities for
nuclear response when America is under attack.
-
- If his behavior does not reflect sheer stupidity, then
he had knowledge that there was no reason for concern on this dimension
and otherwise he was secreting himself away in a public domain to avoid
having to face requests to launch and shoot down commercial aircraft.
-
- In so doing, and the Air Force strangely failing to intercede
against the first two planes, the administration achieved public moral
outrage to initiate its already approved agenda.
-
- A competent prosecutor would show a jury that the administration's
agenda, already in hand, could only be pursued and effectuated as it has
been on the platform of moral outrage created by the successful attacks
on the World Trade Center buildings. President Bush's executive decisions
since 9-11 in effect helps make the case against him.
-
- Thus, to us, it is crystal clear that the President had
advance knowledge of the attacks and that he also deliberately did not
position himself to intercede against the strikes against the World Trade
Center towers. When we see 2662 innocents die to further an agenda playing
to elitism and world domination and control, we then know we are dealing
with a leadership that will not succeed in its agenda in the Middle East
and will invoke China's intercession to undermine the new world order leadership
as set forth by China in The Emperor and the Assassin. Otherwise, to our
minds, we do find that the President had advance knowledge and deliberately
did not act to preclude the first planes striking the World Trade Center
towers where we now know for sure that there were internal explosives placed
and triggered to take down the towers.
-
- We await Bush's decision whether to attack Iraq, albeit
that Saddam Hussein is operating with a new halo above his head to prove
to the world that Bush's primary goal is to secure Iraqi oil and oil reserves.
China has positioned North Korea to possibly forerun or concurrently attack
South Korea to offset Bush's plans in the Middle East mandating that Bush
be quick and swift in his victory there, and thus why Bush wants Israeli
participation and involvement. South Koreans have protested in large numbers
against Bush because it seems the entire world well knows Bush's agenda
but for Americans who support it under continued blind faith that its President
serves the best interests of this country. When we wrote Recapturing America
we told the American people that they need only look at the drug epidemic
among the children of this country, where drugs are sold freely and openly
in schools everywhere, to know that if their government could not solve
that problem, how in the world could they solve any other one exce
- We trust that you well know why we have committed the
time and effort we have to this project of public service. What success
has this generation achieved if it turns out to be a transient time of
wealth before reality sets in for a dark future ahead for our children.
Again, people thought that Solomon was a favorite of G-d because he built
G-d's temple. Solomon built the temple because his father could not and
it was built because of G-d's favor with his father and prior generations
of Jews during their Exodus to the Holy Land. Solomon enjoyed the fruits
and benefits of those blessings, as we do, but we, as he, platform our
own destruction as a people and nation by then turning our backs on G-d.
Solomon contravened direct Divine decree and de facto was the cause of
idolatry in the Holy Land. The Sanhedrin, Congress, looked the other way.
Israel and the United States permit agendas under the umbrella of economic
prosperity to take hold and control of their countries, where the agenda
involves distancing and r
- Joseph Ehrlich
- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
- November 30, 2002
-
- PS. We have updated <>senderberl.com
|
