RENSE.COM

 

Democracy Is Dead - Rest In Peace
By Sara DeHart
1-13-3


January 1, 2001, I began to publicly wear a tombstone button depicting the demise of democracy in America: Requiescat in pace, Rest in Peace. It stated: Born July 4, 1776, Died December 12, 2000, Lynched by: Rehnquist, O'Conner, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas. It named the five Supreme Court Justices who stopped the vote count in Florida; thereby awarding the 43rd presidency of the United States to George W. Bush.
 
This betrayal of America undermined the constitution. As a country we will never be the same. Vincent Bugliosi wrote that "none dare call it treason." But treason it was, and it was treason, unpunished (Bugliosi, 2001).
 
The button attracted attention. Some asked where to buy one and I handed them a button and silently moved on. There were others though who were troubled by the message and sneeringly negated it. A third group asked, "Who are Rehnquist, O'Conner, Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas?" That was when I fully realized that the tombstone button was a symbol for an era that had ended. The America that I knew, like Tara, was Gone with the Wind.
 
How could any American adult not know the names of the five Supreme Court justices who stopped the vote count in Florida in a close presidential race? How could Americans not understand the significance of that decision?
 
We were bombarded by selective information through television, talk radio, newspapers and news magazines about the Florida vote recount and chads. For Americans not to know about this most relevant political event by January 2001 should have alerted even those living in underground bunkers that something was amiss.
 
Marc Ash reported: "America who had long preached to the world of its vaunted free elections had rolled over without a fight. A small group of ruthless industrialists had rigged the White House and handed the nation a clumsy lie. American democracy was gone, and we were the only ones who refused to see it. (Truthout, 7 July, 2002).
 
At the urging of the media, the majority of Americans decided to "get over it and move on." Our system was broken, and the corporate-owned, bought-and-paid-for media was only a symptom of the problem. They selectively reported the news, but we allowed them to get away with it. We did not stand up and demand a free and unfettered press. By January 1, 2001 our system of government, founded as a constitutional, democratic republic was well on its way to oblivion. The most recent election on November 5, 2002 confirmed what has appeared on the Internet for the past two years. Democracy is dead and we have now given it a silent burial.
 
About the time that George Washington gave his farewell to the Republic, a British professor, Alexander Fraser Tyler, wrote: "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can exist only until the voters discover they can vote themselves largesse (defined as a liberal gift) out of the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed by a dictatorship."
 
And what was the price paid for American democracy? A $300 tax "rebate" that turned out to be a tax "advance". Whether it is $300 or much larger sums awarded to the upper income 1.5% of the population, it all translates into 30 pieces of silver. American democracy was sold for a paltry sum, and once the crown jewels of our republic were auctioned and dismantled, we can never retrieve them.
 
What is really sad is that the Constitutional Republic of the United States fell with nary a whimper from the American media. The theme for the day was "get over it," and without examining the cost, Americans accepted it. Before the American public knew what happened we had "First Amendment holding pens" and peaceful protest was decried as divisiveness.
 
Presidential edicts rolled off Mr. Bush's tongue as fast as the speech writers could invent them: Proposed regulations for arsenic levels in our drinking water were rolled back, the Kyoto Agreement went unsigned, and the National parks were opened to the timber and mining industries. It happened so fast that no one could keep track, let alone mobilize protests. The media took brief notice of these happenings and then moved on to note the newest edict.
 
Voices of dissent were raised, but the media paid scant attention. Then 9/11 occurred and the media went to war for the Bush administration. Note that it did not go to war for America; it went to war to proclaim the righteousness of Mr. Bush's holy crusade against "terrorism" and the "axis of evil". The fact that one can not wage a war against an abstract concept was ignored. Wars are waged against nation states, police actions target murders and thieves. Wars against abstract concepts (war on drugs, war on poverty, etc.) are doomed to failure. The enemy must be identified and defined. The media missed this point in each of the 'concept wars'. They marginalized those who dared speak out and dissent became truly hazardous duty.
 
The voices of Americans were stilled by a propagandized media. Those who did not comply, or who raised objections, were labeled "unpatriotic, fringe, kooks, and conspiracy theorists." Noncompliant writers, editors and TV hosts were fired. "Watch what you say" became reality.
 
The death of dissent in George Bush's America has been little noticed in the mainstream media. One of the few voices to be raised was that of Walter Cronkite, who in an address that received no attention from major news sources said:
 
"They (the Germans) applauded as Hitler closed down the independent newspaper and (broadcasting) stations and only gave them his propaganda. When they did not rise up and say, 'Give us a free press,' they became just as guilty." (Ferrell, Common Dreams October 28, 2002).
 
We, too, stand guilty because we have accepted the voices of CNN and Fox news without protest. We have allowed the FCC to remove every regulation in place that guarded the independence of the media. Now we have a consolidated corporate media that speak only for corporate self-interests.
 
On November 5, 2002, we, as a nation, faced the reality of a pre-emptive war against Iraq that could lead to WWIII, and 120 million Americans did not bother to vote. Blame for the outcome of that election that gave one political party control over all three branches of our government, with no oversight, rests with two groups: The media that have chosen to use their 30 pieces of silver to sell out American democracy and 120 million Americans who essentially felt disconnected from the system, and have chosen not to become informed voters. The United States of America can not recover from the legacy of these two groups. The transition has been made, from democracy to totalitarianism in two short years. We, as a people, stand guilty. We did not rise up and say to the Supreme Court Justices, "you can not steal an election of the people;" we did not say to the media "give us a free press." We accepted the edict of the Supreme Court without protest; we accepted the media's "get over it" bromide. We refused to acknowledge that a bloodless coup d'etat had taken place. At that point, the battle for democracy was lost. For those, who in 2001 said, "It can't happen here" and refused to acknowledge that it, indeed, had happened here, let it be known that the funeral has now taken place.
 
How will history view this period of America? The period that will be known as the "Fall of the American Republic" as surely as Rome's demise is recorded as the "Fall of Rome." The dream is dead. Historians will record the evolution from the Supreme Court decision that took the vote from the American people and gave the 43rd presidency to George Walker Bush as a signal marker. Historians will also note that the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon was perverted into a political tactic as cynical as the one Hitler used when the Reichstag burned in February, 1933. Hitler viewed the burning of the Parliament building as "an act of God" and used that event to set the political agenda for the next decade. Mr. Bush said "he hit the trifecta" after the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. He took the stance of Caesar and, in America's name, began the conquest of the world.
 
Historians will note the ramifications of the secrecy and the hiding of documents by key administrative figures in the Bush Administration. They will puzzle over the lack of an independent investigation of the events leading to the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. One day, historians will note the loss of civil liberties such as the right to dissent and privacy. They will look at domestic spying by the Office of Total Information Awareness and the return of political assassins to key positions in the current administration as they ponder how and why a once great and free nation marched into the abyss of totalitarianism. Will they also note that this happened, not with a bang on 911, but through a slowly eroding process that was little noted by the Fourth Estate? Freedom of the press, the Constitutional Right, so gallantly fought for by John Peter Zenger in 1731 was surrendered without a murmur.
 
What we witnessed on November 5, 2002 was democracy's funeral. The fact that 60.4% of eligible voters didn't bother to show up gives some idea of how dead democracy truly is in 2002.
 
 
A brave and noble experiment of government, by and for the people, lies dead and buried. Neither the requiem nor the events leading to its demise were even recorded as newsworthy by the mainstream media.
 
Let the obituary read: Democracy is dead-RIP-Born July 4, 1776-Died December 12, 2000-Funeral November 5, 2002. Mourners may pay their respects by standing in First Amendment containment zones. They may not carry banners nor signal their protest or presence in any way, lest they offend members of the Bush administration.
 
Sara DeHart, a freelance writer and democracy activist, lives in the Seattle, Washington area of the United States.
 
Sara DeHart encourages your comments: <mailto:dehart.ss@verizon.net>dehart.ss@verizon.net
 
 
Comment
 
From Sarah N. Julion
Phoenix, Arizona
1-14-3
 
 
 
"Let me start by saying that I am no fan of George W. Bush; he and Clinton/Gore are two sides of the same evil coin. This comment is to educate Sara DeHart on some things she doesn't seem to understand. Ms. DeHart has a definite definition problem. In her article she refers to the United States in one paragraph as a "Democracy" and in another as a "Constitutional Republic" - it's either one OR the other - can't be both. Webster's Dictionary defines democracy as a "form of government by and for the people" i.e. mob rule, which is in fact what we have today in the United States. The same dictionary defines republic as "a political unit or state where representatives are elected to exercise the power" which is what the US was founded to be and how it used to be run before Lincoln centralized it all and turned it into a democracy.
 
Here are a few quotes from the people who actually started this country AS a republic. Here's what they thought of "democracy" -
"Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." John Adams, letter to John Taylor, April 15, 1814. John Adams was a signer of the Declaration of Independence and the 2nd President of the United States. Does it sound like he would have helped found something that he thought would "murder itself"? Here's another thought from John Adams - "Democracy will soon degenerate into an anarchy, such an anarchy that every man will do what is right in his own eyes and no man's life or property or reputation or liberty will be secure, and every one of these will soon mould itself into a system of subordination of all the moral virtues and intellectual abilities, all the powers of wealth, beauty, wit and science, to the wanton pleasures, the capricious will, and the execrable cruelty of one or a very few." If that doesn't describe America in 2003 I don't know what does! Why, Sara DeHart, are you saying "democracy is dead"? It is very much alive (hasn't killed itself quite yet) right here in the good 'ole US of A thanks to people like you who don't understand (care) what the United States is supposed to be. You should be joyous instead of mourning.
 
This quote is from James Madison, the 4th President of the United States - "Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." That's from the Federalist No. 10, November 23, 1787; you should actually read the Federalist Papers sometime, you might learn something of value. Again, the current status of "democracy" in the US is alive and well, unfortunately.
 
Here are some thoughts on Republican Government by the people who made it possible for you, Ms. DeHart, to say what you did in that article you wrote without being arrested. "The republican is the only form of government which is not eternally at open or secret war with the rights of mankind." Thomas Jefferson, March 11, 1790. He wrote the Declaration of Independence and was the 3rd President of the United States. Now, take the two definitions and which do you think the United States is now?? It is run, for the most part, as a democracy, NOT a republic as it was founded to be. So you should be joyous instead of mourning.
 
A democracy involves mass participation of the people in passing laws and operating the decision-making processes of government. In a republic, on the other hand, the people's representatives pass the laws and operate the government. The Founders thoroughly understood the fatal weaknesses of a pure democracy and warned against the masses attempting to manage all public business. No where, not even once, is the word "democracy" in the United States Constitution. Many times, however, is the word republic/republican mentioned. How about we, all of us, actually go to the source and read what THEY said about our country, instead of trusting blindly what we've been taught in dumbed-down government schools all these years or what we hear on the purely liberal network news. How about we actually read the Constitution and Declaration of Independence OURSELVES and make up our OWN minds (do we have those anymore?) about things. Let's read the source material ourselves, the actual writings of the people who founded our country, instead of being led around by nose rings by socialist college professors. If people like you, Ms. DeHart, WANT to live in a "democracy" then go ahead, the United States has several exits.

 

Disclaimer





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros