- WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Emboldened
by the U.S. military's apparent quick rout of Iraqi forces, conservative
hawks in America are setting their sights on regime change in Iran and
Syria.
-
- "It's time to bring down the other terror masters,"
Michael Ledeen of the American Enterprise Institute wrote on Monday --
two days before U.S. troops swept into the heart of Baghdad -- in a piece
entitled "Syria and Iran Must Get Their Turn."
-
- "Iran, at least, offers Americans the possibility
of a memorable victory, because the Iranian people openly loath the regime,
and will enthusiastically combat it, if only the United States supports
them in their just struggle," he added. "Syria cannot stand alone
against a successful democratic revolution that topples tyrannical regimes
in Kabul, Tehran and Iraq."
-
- No one is explicitly advocating force against Syria or
Iran but conservatives inside and out of the U.S. government hope the Iraq
war will signal to Damascus and Tehran that seeking weapons of mass destruction
may be hazardous to their health.
-
- "I hope we could change the regimes without military
force and I would not contemplate using military force in those places,"
said Kenneth Adelman, a former Pentagon aide and early advocate of toppling
Iraqi President Saddam Hussein by force.
-
- "The combination of totalitarianism and weapons
of mass destruction is a deadly combination for the world," he added.
-
- While some conservatives believe the example of Iraq
could serve to undermine the governments of some of its nondemocratic neighbors,
others simply hope it will dissuade them from seeking biological, chemical
and nuclear weapons.
-
- GETTING THE MESSAGE
-
- John Bolton, under secretary of state for arms control
and international security, told reporters in Rome he hoped Iran, Syria
and North Korea -- which the United States believes is pursuing a nuclear
weapons program -- will get the message.
-
- "We are hopeful that a number of regimes will draw
the appropriate lesson from Iraq that the pursuit of weapons of mass destruction
is not in their national interest," he said, citing the three when
asked what the post-war period may hold.
-
- A U.S. official played down the idea that the United
States was contemplating using force against Iran or Syria, suggesting
the hawks were simply reflecting the "strategic ambiguity" that
the U.S. has long practiced with potential adversaries.
-
- "When talking about threats from countries that
have really bad track records and don't wish you well, U.S. policy has
been to never rule anything out," he said. "That doesn't mean
you're actively contemplating an invasion or the use of force."
-
- Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who on March 28 warned
Syria and Iran not to meddle in the Iraq war, said on Wednesday the United
States had evidence Damascus might be helping Saddam's relatives and supporters
flee the country.
-
- While he did not cite Syria or Iran by name, Vice President
Dick Cheney said in a speech to newspaper editors that the United States
must "do whatever it takes" to defeat terrorism and must confront
nations that sponsor it.
-
- The United States regards Iran and Syria as state sponsors
of terrorism. U.S. officials believe both are pursuing weapons of mass
destruction, accusing Iran of seeking nuclear weapons. Iran says its nuclear
program aims to produce electricity.
-
- "In removing the terror regime from Iraq, we send
a very clear message to all groups that operate by means of terror and
violence against the innocent," Cheney said. "The United States
and our coalition partners are showing ... we have the capacity and the
will to wage war on terror and to win decisively."
-
- "We have a further responsibility to help keep the
peace of the world and to prevent the terrorists and their sponsors from
plunging the world into horrific violence," he added.
-
- Frank Gaffney, a senior Pentagon official under former
President Ronald Reagan, said he believed that regime change should be
the U.S. policy toward Iran and Syria and said the United States could
not rule out the use of force.
-
- "If the threat metastasizes in such a way that we
consider it to leave us no choice but to use military force then that would
have to be an option," he said.
-
- Gaffney, head of the Center for Security Policy think
tank, said many Iranians would like to see their government change and
the United States should help them through information flows, economic
assistance and possibly covert activity.
-
- "The use of military force is probably genuinely
the last resort here, but I certainly think it's like that we're going
to see efforts made to bring about change in Iran as well as Syria ...
and perhaps elsewhere in the region as a matter of the natural progression
of this war on terror," he added.
|
