- In Luc Besson's delightful film, The Fifth Element (with
perfect Milla Jovovich and supreme Bruce Willis), an absolutely evil force,
the Shadow, Messenger of Death, comes from Outer Space to destroy human
life on our planet. It is impervious to bombs and missiles, and regardless
of what people do, it closes in, and its cover ever thicker upon the earth.
Yet in order to succeed the Shadow needs some human help. Who will, for
personal profit, assist the satanic Shadow in his quest to destroy our
Mother Earth? In the best tongue-in-cheek tradition of Swift, Besson gave
the monstrous volunteer, that servant-of-profit, a scary name: Zog.
-
- The name of pre-war Albanian King, Zog is one of a few
words that kick the fearsome Thought Police of ADL into action, activate
FBI like Anthrax, and can send IDF assassins and ARA punks in hot pursuit,
for this king like the Jewish God - does not like his name to be mentioned.
This name came back to me with the impending instalment of General Jay
Garner as Viceroy of Iraq. Garner received his credentials from the bloody
hands of Ariel Sharon: he supported the killing of the Palestinians by
signing, in October 2000, a letter that began: "We believe that the
Israel Defence Forces have exercised remarkable restraint in the face of
lethal violence orchestrated by the leadership of the Palestinian Authority."
The letter was launched by JINSA, "the major link of the Israel lobby,
the Washington-based and Likud-supporting Jewish Institute for National
Security Affairs", as defined by Michael Lind of the New Statesman,
or "another thinly disguised Israeli espionage and recruiting front",
according to Washington observer Jeffrey Steinberg of EIR. Signing the
letter was a good move on General Garner's part: it will give him the rule
of Iraq.
-
- However, he will not have too much money at his disposal.
Despite NO WAR FOR OIL' slogans, Iraqi oil won't make Americans rich. Iraq
has a huge national debt - $70 billion to Russia alone - and the Occupation
Regime will have to cough it up. Debt to France is over $30 billion, and
it will have to be paid. On top of this, the US Occupation Administration
will have to spend considerable amounts of money on repairing the Iraqi
infrastructure, destroyed by sanctions and war, before paying one cent
of commission to Dick Cheney and his company. No, this war was not fought
for the imperial interests of the US or for its mammoth oil companies.
-
- As the head of the Occupation Administration, Jay Garner's
task is to create a new Iraq, friendly to Israel. The Jerusalem Post, a
hard-line Zionist daily published by Conrad Black, friend of Pinochet and
Sharon, carried an interview with one of his wannabe Quislings, Ahmad Chalabi's
right hand man, Musawi.
-
- "Musawi talks enthusiastically of his hopes for
the closest possible ties with Israel. There will be no place for Palestinians
in the new Iraq, for the large Palestinian community is regarded by INC
leaders (and presumably by their Zionist instructors) as a loathsome fifth
column. Instead, an 'arc of peace'; would run from Turkey, through Iraq
and Jordan to Israel, creating a new fulcrum in the Middle East."
-
- The Occupation Regime in Iraq was installed by the US
army in the interests of Zionists, and it may be rightly called ZOG, Zionist
Occupation Government if anything. However, this ZOG is also a Zog, a servant
of Darkness and Annihilation, for its first step was the destruction of
Baghdad's libraries and museums. A scholar of Zionism, Joachim Martillo,
wrote:
-
- "Zionism has long taken a position of stripping
target populations of their cultural heritage and turning them into clay
so that they can be remoulded in conformance with Zionist ideology".
-
- My learned friend is right. This week I took myself to
a lonely hill near Mesecha, a small village in the heart of Biblical Israel,
where a few young ISM activists and villagers helplessly watched the Caterpillar
machines uprooting olive trees, smashing lupines, devouring this unique
Biblical landscape, home and cradle of the people of Palestine. They did
not dare step out in front of the machines, for the American volunteer
Rachel Corrie was murdered in similar circumstances, to the deafening sound
of silence from Washington. Jeffrey Blankfort, the analyst from California,
had good reason for calling Washington "the Zionists' Most Important
Occupied Territory".
-
- Thus, the burned manuscripts of Baghdad and uprooted
olive trees of Mesecha lead to Zog and to ZOG. This homonymy points to
a telling semantic concurrence; as Kuang-Ming Wu said in The Butterfly
as Companion: "Words of a sound flock together in sense; like sound,
like sense". Thus witty Luc Besson, who borrowed the idea of the Five
Elements from Socrates, gave us a lesson: "ZOG is Zog".
-
- II
-
- For a while, the Jewish establishment tried to deny its
direct involvement in the Third World War. They furiously rejected references
to high and mighty Jews pushing for war as, (you guessed it) "antisemitism".
But eventually the denial wall was broken, and in the Israeli newspaper
Haaretz, the culprits, a "band of 20-30 Jewish intellectuals",
the Neo-Cons, admitted they did it. Afterwards, Michael Lind summarised
their powerful positions in the New Statesman, while my countryman Gabriel
Ash optimistically predicted: "In a couple of months, when the role
of the Zionists in the war will become widely known, The New York Times
will publish an editorial sheepishly bemoaning the way some Pentagon officials
have let their personal views influence U.S. policy".
-
- The problem is, the US people have no way out of the
Zionist takeover. While Neo-Cons and Right-wingers are guilty of starting
World War Three, of introducing Fascist measures against the American population,
of premeditated aggression against sovereign Iraq and of unrestrained support
for the racist Jewish State, it would be mistake to leave the buck resting
with them. Michael Moore's philippics against President Bush are convincing
only up to a point, for in his bestselling book, The Stupid White Men,
he regrets that Al Gore was not allowed to enjoy the victory that was his
by rights. But if Al Gore and Joseph Lieberman were the White House incumbents
now, the US Marines would be in Baghdad nevertheless, the National Library
of Iraq and Iraqi museums would still have been looted, and the olive trees
of Mesecha uprooted and the flow of American cash to Israel would be continuing
unabated.
-
- Every publicist, every internet user in America and Europe
knows by now that the only superpower' was taken over by the Likudniks,
the supporters of the right-wing Likud and its bloody leader General Sharon.
The team of Bush and Sharon, or BuSharon, in internet parlance, horrifies
the right-minded. But is there an alternative in American politics? Al
Gore was a hand-picked and chosen disciple of Podhoretz' the Zionist, Lieberman
is a devoted Zionist. Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean, has
a Jewish wife, and both his children, 17-year-old Paul and 18-year-old
Anne, have chosen to identify as Jews', we were informed by JTA, the Jewish
Telegraphic Assn called The Global News Service of the Jewish People. Kerry
discovered his Jewish roots', and Kucinich told the Jewish newspaper Forward
that he "observes kashrut, has an ex-Israeli girlfriend and knows
most of the Haggadah (Passover narrative) by heart". Apparently, the
forthcoming elections in the US (as the previous ones) are the elections
for the front figure of Zionist-led America. Left Zionists or Right Zionists
- that is the only choice for Americans, and, alas, for the whole world.
Why did it come to pass?
-
- We can find an answer in a short and sincere piece by
Eric Alterman, a good Leftist, a journalist with the anti-war Nation. He
admits freely: "My own dual loyalties -- there, I admitted it -- were
drilled into me by my parents, my grandparents, my Hebrew school teachers
and my rabbis, not to mention Israeli teen-tour leaders and AIPAC college
representatives. Whose interests come for me first, America's or Israel's?
I feel pretty lonely admitting that, every once in a while, I'm going to
go with what's best for Israel".
-
- Bear in mind: while the right-wing Jews were always shamelessly
chauvinist, the left kept up a universalist appearance. If that is a voluntary
admission of a progressive left-wing journalist, you can easily guess what's
on the mind of the average American Jew. As an Israeli, I should be happy
that millions of American Jews stand for me. However, Israel' in Alterman's
confession stands for the People of Israel', the Jews', not for the Middle
Eastern State of Israel. If Alterman does not mind robbing his fellow Americans
of their hard earned cash in order to sustain Israeli occupation (as he
freely admits), he is probably ready to go much further for the sake of
his own community, American Jewry. And this community is managed and represented
by not by the ostracised Noam Chomsky, but by an extremely unpleasant bunch
of billionaires, media lords and warmongers.
-
- If Alterman were the only Jew in the media, one would
be able to dismiss his self-admitted bias as the normal influence of an
important community. If Jews in the media constituted only 3% as their
share in the general population, Alterman's position would be affordable.
But their share in the top echelon of the media is in double digits; according
to some sources it approaches 60%.
-
- Jeff Blankfort writes, "Ardently pro-Israel American
Jews are in positions of unprecedented influence within the United States
and have assumed or been given decision making positions over virtually
every segment of our culture and body politic". And he quotes Benjamin
Ginsberg's "The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State":
-
- "Jews played a central role in American finance
during the 1980s, and they were among the chief beneficiaries of that decade's
corporate mergers and reorganizations. Today, though barely 2% of the nation's
population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews. The chief
executive officers of the three major television networks and the four
largest film studios are Jews, as are the owners of the nation's largest
newspaper chain and the most influential single newspaper, the New York
Times".
-
- Is it a conspiracy of Jews to steal the Republic? No,
no conspiracy is necessary. In Jules Verne's juvenile novel, Children of
Captain Grant, a villain leads the captain's ship astray by placing a magnet
brick beneath the compass. The magnet does not conspire: it constrains
the compass. The sheer mass of self-involved Jews in the media acts in
a similar way and draws the superpower off its normal course. For the media
is the nerve system of a modern state. Modern democracy in practice in
a very complicated society can be compared to a sophisticated computer.
Its machinery can function successfully on one condition: there is a free
flow of information across the system. While every input is instinctively
checked and sieved on one criterion, whether it is good for Jews, it is
not odd that the machine produces such freak output as revenge on Babylon
for its destruction of Jerusalem in BC 586. Indeed, in long-gone 1948 the
first ruler of Israel, David Ben Gurion, promised: "We shall mete
historic vengeance to Assyria, Aram and Egypt". Now it comes to pass,
as Iraq, Syria and Egypt are targeted by Zog.
-
- Thus, concentration of Jews in the media created the
distortion. A takeover of every other part of industry or trade would be
noticed and reported in the media; but there is no remedy for media takeover.
Discussion of this unbearable situation is further stifled by the political
correctness' taboo. PC has its good sides, for it made life easier for
a lone outsider. However, this very good and useful device has its limits
of application. Otherwise, it could be used to defend South African apartheid,
or British colonial rule in India. Isn't it anti-white racism to notice
that the political power in apartheid South Africa belonged to whites?
Surely there are poor and good whites? Gandhi could be condemned as racist',
for he noticed' the privileged position of the British in India. By PC
logic, a good American should reply to Mahatma: yes, there are some rich
and powerful Brits in India, but there are also poor Tommy Atkinses, governesses,
honest administrators, writers like Kipling and Orwell. On the other hand,
there are powerful and rich Rajas, important Brahmins. How do you dare,
sir, to demand de-colonisation'! This is sheer anti-English racism!
-
- An old Indian Air Force officer Joe Thomas actually reminded
that, "while the population of the US today is approximately the same
as the population of India a century ago, the British in India never numbered
more than 50,000 and still ruled India. They did not rule India by force
but by dominating Indian discourse. Indians fought for the British and
put down rebellions. During the two world wars, millions of Indians fought
as volunteers for Britain. If such a tiny group could control India, then
it is not strange that 100 times that number can influence the United States".
-
- In no way should we embrace racism. Au contraire, the
anti-racist fervour of America should be turned against the Jewish racists
- Elliott Abrams, Deborah Lipstadt and others of their ilk - who publish
treatises comparing intermarriage with a holocaust. It should be turned
against the Wolfowitz Cabal who push for racist war in the Middle East
for the sake of the racist Jewish state. It should be turned against media
owners who employ disproportionate numbers of Jews and thus discriminate
against non-Jewish Americans. It should be turned against the church leaders
who agreed to the racist notion that Jews are the only people in the world
who do not need to be baptised. It should be turned against the Jewish/non-Jewish
discrimination; for the present situation when a goy killer of Klinghoffer
the Jew is hunted by the CIA, but the Jewish killer of Rachel Corrie goes
scot-free is perversion of natural justice. Jewish racism should be confronted;
otherwise America will forever have to choose between Likud and Meretz
on its way to Armageddon.
-
- Jewish dominance in the media should be redressed, among
other measures, by separating advertising and media. Advertising media
shouldn't carry news or articles, and non-advertising media should be forbidden
to carry advertising. Commercial advertising in the general media was (according
to Werner Sombart) an 18th century Jewish invention. Apparently that was
good for Jews', but not for society in general, as it turned the media
away from readers towards advertisers. The separation could be enforced
by banning all forms of media and business interaction, like we ban all
interaction of police and business. The media is more important than police
for the safety of society. It should be free from undue influences. Media
is the compass of society. It is necessary to remove the magnet from its
vicinity, in order that the good ship of our society sail smoothly.
-
- III
-
- Such a concentration of any minority group (be it Korean
or Mormon) in the media would be perilous. However, the concentration of
Jews has its specifics, for the Jews profess a different, non-Christian,
or even anti-Christian faith. Your average Jewish editor or media lord
is distinctly unhappy whenever he encounters a reference to Christ or His
Blessed Mother, for their very names are subject to strong and explicit
taboo in his culture. At best, he will try to balance it with a pro-Judaic
piece or reference. If Christian Americans were to refer often to Christ,
the frequency of Judaic references would grow also, disproportionately
to the Jewish share in the population. In our terms, the magnet brick of
Jews-in-discourse has turned the American boat towards forms of worship
more palatable for Jews'.
-
- At this moment many enlightened readers' interest begins
to wane. If Goebbels' hand automatically reached for his [Robert?] Browning
at the word culture', modern Western man is conditioned to seek the Delete
button at the name of Christ. However, we shall try your patience with
an even more severe test and bring in the rich word Metaphysics'.
-
- Young drivers often disregard manufacturers' advice and
use unsuitable oil for their engines. Others use unsuitable fuel. They
say: my car functions anyway, so why I should pay more?' Terms such as
compression' and ignition' sound like Mumbo-Jumbo to our young driver:
he has never seen them. Only after few unpleasant experiences is a driver
is convinced that invisible compression is a perfectly real phenomenon
that can manifest itself as sudden breakdown on the turnpike. Metaphysics
is exactly that: a hidden but perfectly real force within the engine of
our civilisation. M. Jourdain of Moliere's Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme was
amazed that unbeknownst to himself he had spoken prose all his life. We
are equally amazed to learn that we apply some metaphysical categories
in our daily life. Indeed, our treatment of our neighbours, our social
behaviour depends on such Mumbo Jumbo words as relationship of Man and
God'.
-
- The Jewish concept of the Man-to-God relationship is
metaphysically different from the (say) Catholic one, as different as diesel
fuel and carburettor fuel. The prominence of Jews in Western discourse
causes the same sort of trouble that you would experience if you were to
refuel your diesel car with petrol.
-
- The Jewish faith as practiced by observant Jews might
contain many positive ideas shared by other religions, It also borrowed
a lot from other religious systems: for instance, sayings of Christ were
imported into Mishna and ascribed to Hillel the Elder (according to Niebuhr).
However, it is based on troublesome metaphysics, and metaphysical level
survives even the present low level of Jewish religiosity. According to
its teaching, the One and Only God created This One and Only World, and
remained totally separated from the World. It is stressed by the Cabalist
term Zimzum, Contracting Divinity; which holds that God's withdrawal from
the meta-world leaves some meta-space' to the Material World. God-less
World is the necessary partner of Other-Worldly God. Thus the immanent
World is cruel and ruthless, a place of eternal warfare, while God is transcendental
and unreachable. There are no prophets', God can not intervene in our decisions',
the Law is given to us and God can't change it' these maxims effectively
create a Godless world. Sure, God exists, but he does not manifest Himself.
-
- In Christian faith, Christ and His Mother bridged the
World-God divide by His Incarnation, and brought in Compassion and Mercy.
Since then, this World is full of the Light of Christ that is a Divine
Light. People became brothers-in-Christ, His soul unites them, and an offence
against a fellow man is also offence against Christ. (I describe the ideal,
paradigmatic metaphysics of Christian faith, as different from reality
as the scheme of the engine in your manual differs from the real engine
of your five-year-old car).
-
- In the Godless world of Jewish metaphysics there was
an island of light, [the People of] Israel, crowned by the Torah. Israel'
of the Jews corresponds to Christ' of the Christians. The relationship
between the people of Israel and themselves is brotherly, for they are
one family (descendents of Jacob), and they recognise this spark of light
in each other. It is apparently similar to the brotherhood-in-Christ, but
metaphysically quite different, for while (in Christian metaphysics) every
son of Adam and Eve is entitled to the Light of Christ, in Jewish metaphysics
other people, non-Israel, are absolutely God-less, all thinking beast'.
In some esoteric Jewish teachings non-Jews are denied even their descent
from Adam. There is no way to transform a non-Israel to a member of Israel,
for Jewish conversion is but the correction of an error: certain Israelite
was by mistake born into a non-Israelite family, and his conversion is
but the public recognition of this error.
-
- (Indeed, there is a good real-life example, provided
by two converts, Jennifer and Andrew. Jennifer converted, and moved into
Gaza to defend the Palestinian cause. Andrew continued after his conversion
to defend Jews and Jewish terror in Palestine on every Internet forum.
I have to agree with the Rabbis: Jennifer failed to convert because she
was born with a Christian soul, while Andrew was born a Jew, and conversion
just authorised it.)
-
- Thus difference between ours' and theirs', insider' and
outsider' in Judaism is much more rigidly drawn than in other major religions
(pace Zoroastrians, another fossil, in Toynbee's terminology, that happily
remained a sleeping fossil) as non-Jews are absolutely profane while Jews
are holy. A non-Jew who describes a world without God is not too wrong,
from the Jewish point of view, for the non-Jew has no connection to God.
Such a non-Jew is preferable to a Christian, for the Christian claims he
is the equal of Jews, and that is sacrilege for a Jew. That is why prominent
Jews in the media and universities outwardly support the doctrine of religious
indifference or atheistic materialism. All religions are the same', or
religion is not important' or religion is a personal matter of an individual',
or nobody has seen God' are equal to saying all fuels are the same', fuel
makes no difference', or nobody has seen compression'.
-
- Alexander Dugin, a contemporary Russian Traditionalist
philosopher, a follower of Rene Guenon, traced the original fault of Jewish
metaphysics to its extreme Creationism', the idea of One and Only God (monotheism)
that created totally separate One and Only World (monocosmism) ex nihilo
(out of nothing). One could dismiss Dugin's view by claiming that Creation
is also a part and parcel of Christian dogma. However, in Christian metaphysics
the equivalent of Creation is Incarnation, fruit of sacral union of the
Godhead and mortal woman, while pre-history described in the Old Testament
is effectively excluded from consideration or is re-interpreted through
the concept of Pre-figuration.
-
- The OT could not be accepted or rejected in toto by the
Early Christians, for the wonderful codex of the native Ancient Palestinian
poetry, liturgy, metaphysics, religion and tradition, was heavily edited
by the immigrant Soferim (the spiritual precursors of Pharisees). Memory
of this editing was preserved in the Semitic world, and it was referred
to by the Prophet Muhammad, peace upon him. Old Palestinian tradition was
much more holistic, and its gods El and his spouse Ashera were integrated
into environment as the rain-sending Heaven of Palestine and the fruit-giving
Land of Palestine. Together, they are the equivalent of God' of OT, and
the Gospel preserved for us the last words of Jesus on the Cross. He called
to El, not to Yahve.
-
- The Old Palestinian tradition and its younger gods, Baal
the Homeless ("Birds have nests, but Son of God has no home"),
who defied Death, was killed and Resurrected, and Anath the Virgin, were
perfect pre-figurations of the Gospel, certainly better ones than those
offered by Pharisees. (A materialist would say that the Palestinian tradition
had influenced the Gospel writers and the founders of the Christianity.)
-
- Early Christians were aware of the problematic qualities
of the OT, but they had no tools to undo the Soferim-Pharisees' editing
and restore the Palestinian text. The Pharisees (for the Pharisee teaching
won the day among Jews) took over the Palestinian heritage as surely as
King Macbeth took over Scotland.
-
- (The Jewish editing of the Bible did not stop to this
very day: CE Carlson and Steven Sizer noted that Scofield Reference Bible
published by Oxford University Press calls for adoration of Israel in more
explicit way with each new edition being published: "With limitless
advertising and promotion, it became the best-selling "bible"
in America and has remained so for 90 years. Scofield chose not to change
the text of the King James Edition. Instead, he added hundreds of easy-to-read
footnotes at the bottom of about half of the pages, and his notes weave
parts of the Old and New Testaments together as though they were written
at the same time by the same people". First edition was arranged and
financed by "Samuel Untermeyer, a New York lawyer whose firm still
exists today and one of the wealthiest and most powerful Zionists in America".
This Zionist edition of the OT explains a lot of the strange phenomenon
of Christian Zionism.)
-
- The Early Christians decided to put far away the OT (the
Church forbade laymen to read it) but not too far. They relied upon St
Paul (and later St Augustine) that there is a way to re-interpret the OT
in the Christian spirit. It is true, Mein Kampf can be re-interpreted as
a Zionist text, and it was actually done by some Zionist Nazi antisemites
from Adolf Eichmann to Donald Pauly, but I shall be first to admit this
is forced interpretation. It would be better to restore the Palestinian
reading of OT but it could not be done easily in the reality of ideological
struggle for souls of Jews, against the Pharisee (and their heirs Tannaim)
establishment.
-
- The great Russian historian Leon Gumilev asserted that
the OT remained as a latent part of Christian tradition for historic reasons:
in the First-to-Fourth-Centuries' ideological warfare between Orthodoxy
and Gnosticism, the OT was used by the Church Fathers as a handy weapon
against some esoteric concepts of the Gnostics. The unbridled Gnostics
considered the Material world being evil, and were able to conceptualise
the world as a place as hostile to people as was the world of the defeated
Jewish paradigm. Indeed, late resurrections of Gnosticism (Albigensian,
Manichaean, Cathari heresies) proved its social danger. The teaching of
Evil World would effectively extinguish all life on the planet.
-
- However, the sharp sword of the OT did not want to sleep
in its sheath. Massive import of Old Testament ideas by Protestants revitalised
the submerged Jewish paradigm and brought in the extermination of Native
Americans, the Canaanites of the New Promised Land of the New Chosen People',
and eventually the Rise of the Jews to their present pre-eminence in American
(and through it, in Western) discourse.
-
- (Here is the place to explain that Jew' for this author
is an ideological and metaphysical construct, an abbreviation of an adept
of the Jewish paradigm'. Nobody has to be a Jew, or indeed a Cathari, or
a Dialectical Materialist. The term has no racial meaning, despite the
deep inherent racism of the bearers of the Jewish paradigm. A racist-nationalist
derivation of a Jew' is Zionist, for Zionists concentrate their attention
on the actual historical Jewish People and believe in their unique Chosen-ness.
The Universalist derivation of Jew' is Mammonite', for Mammonites accept
and universalise the outwardly aspects of the Jewish paradigm. An absolute
Jew' is a Zionist (for himself and other Jews) and a Mammonite (towards
non-Jews). A non-Jew can be (a mistakenly altruistic) Zionist, or (an egoistic)
Mammonite, but by embracing both concepts he turns into a neo-Jew', like
Conrad Black, the owner of the bulk of British media. A perfect Christian'
is the antithesis of an absolute Jew', for he denies both the divine right'
of Jews to suppress non-Jews (in Palestine and elsewhere), and the Mammonite
egoism towards his neighbour. A perfect Christian' is anti-Zionist, for
actual historical Jews are his dear potential brothers-in-Christ, who should
be enlightened, not isolated and locked far away. (That is why racist antisemites
are not perfect Christians') A perfect Christian' is anti-Mammonite, for
he treats everybody as his neighbour. (That is why neo-liberals are not
perfect Christians').
-
- In America, with its predominance of Jews in discourse,
perfectly Christian' ideas are blocked and do not enter the discourse,
while partly-Jewish' ideas pass through the sieve of the Jewish editors
and professors. Thus, the ideas of von Hayek, Popper and Soros that conform
to the outwardly Jewish paradigm are amplified and made central. Its American
counterpart is Objectivism, the philosophy of Ayn Rand, an American best-selling
(voluminous novels Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead) guru writer, and
its religious offshoot, Californian Satanism as outlined in The Satanic
Bible by Anton LaVey, nee Levy, a Zionist-turned-Satanist. Their sites
are full of praise of Israel and Zionism, and, yes, of Satan. Among their
adepts was President Ronald Reagan, for this form of Satanism is the religion
of Neo-Liberalism: get what you can, do not care for the other'; the Chosen
are those that have', while the have-nots are damned sinners. It explains
the Americans' fear to be a loser', for a loser is a sinner in the world
of predestination.
-
- Thus the Jewish sieve in the media ushers in openly satanic
themes. The following excerpt illuminates the point: Madonna's manager,
who was thinking of signing up Manson, called Manson's manager to inquire
about whether the rocker had a swastika among his many tattoos. 'Of course
not,' said Manson's manager. 'One of the guys in the band is Jewish.' 'Oh,
OK,' said Madonna's manager. 'We don't have a problem with Satanism, but
we can't deal with any kind of Nazism.'"
-
- "Now he insinuates that Jews have demonic nature!"
- fumes my Jewish reader. Well, demonic as in Maxwell demon'. The Scottish
physicist James Clerk Maxwell built a thermodynamic model of a box with
a tiny door operated by a demon. The demon lets in fast molecules and lets
out slow molecules. Thus the box can be heated to any temperature even
in coldest atmosphere. In a similar way, Jews let into discourse good for
Jews' items and try to block the bad for Jews' items. "It is done
by all communities", - rejects my reader. Not really. A writer may
depict a bad Englishman or American, Arab (any day!) or Muslim, and he
will never receive a single letter of objection. A writer may present a
homosexual priest, and he will never receive a letter saying Not every
priest is homosexual' or demanding to offset the bias' by showing a saintly
priest.
-
- But every negative depiction of a Jew will run into a
Maxwell demon. Dickens portrayed Fagin, the repulsive gang operator, in
his Oliver Twist, and came under barrage with letters and questions of
the sort "not every Jew is a Fagin". Dickens never claimed it,
but he was forced to apologise to Jews at every lecture he made in America.
It taught him a lesson, and he refrained from showing Jews of less than
saintly qualities.
-
- Since then, a rare author dares to introduce a negative
Jewish character in his book. Le Carre managed to write a book, Single
and Single, about dismantling of the Soviet Union and mass theft of Russian
communal property without a single Jew in it. This is like describing Mafia
without mentioning Italians.
-
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn encountered this problem, as in
his books there are complex Jewish figures. They are KGB officers, informers,
top of prison administration. None is demonised, but none is made a saint,
either. He was immediately attacked and offered a way out: to introduce
a main character, a noble strong and daring Jew'. He ignored the advice.
-
- Thus the world we live in was created. Like the box managed
by the Maxwell demon, it is overheated', for the critique of Jews is removed.
There are bad guys of all persuasions in the fiction and in the media,
but hardly any Jews. "Jews are like everybody else", my good
Jewish friends would say often. But in the mirror of the discourse, the
Jews are usually saints or martyrs. In order to normalise the discourse,
to save Palestine and the Middle East, to save the remnants of Christianity
in the West, the Maxwell Demon should be removed.
-
- The Jews in the media are unable to permit critique of
Jews, be it of the media lords or of Israel, or of the evil neo-cons. The
sieve they form is about to cause the framing' of Christ and Christians
for Zionists' crimes. Sacked Baghdad is still reeling after the strike,
and already the left-wing Zionist Saul Landau has published an article
subtitled "Shop, Go to Church, Support Bush's War". Thus the
most anti-Christian regime of Bush and Wolfowitz is mis-presented as a
manifestation of Christianity.
-
- Jeffrey Blankfort (a strong and principled anti-Zionist
voice, and good proof that a descendent of Jews does not have to adhere
to the Jewish paradigm) noted: "Landau mentions not a word about the
role of the Jewish neo-cons or Israel's urging of the US to pursue the
war on Iraq, pushing the onus on to the Born-Again Christians".
-
- This brings us back, to the Fifth Element of Luc Besson,
for in the movie as in real life, Zog is not an independent force. A slave
of Mammon, a servant of the Shadow, he is helping the Dark force fulfil
its metaphysical task, to blot out the Light of Christ and to turn our
world into Godless desert. That is why he sends bulldozers to wipe out
flowers in Palestine, sends troops to sack Baghdad and Damascus, threatens
Paris and Moscow, perverts Christianity.
-
- Is there a remote chance to save the world from the Shadow?
One feels that the rule of King Zog is as secure in Washington as it was
in pre-war Albania, as secure as the rule of King Macbeth in his Scotland,
for no ordinary man can defeat him. But on Palm Sunday I walked down the
Mount of Olives from Bethpage, where Our Lord (not an ordinary man) mounted
the donkey, to the Lions' Gate of Jerusalem, in the midst of a huge procession
of all denominations, for miraculously, the great Churches of the East
and the West decided to celebrate Easter in Palestine together.
-
- This had an all-important message, for the Orthodox Church
puts emphasis on Christ the God, while the Latin Church emphasizes Christ
the Man, as our Muslim brothers praise the Holy Spirit of God, and all
of us are united in love for the beautiful Land of Palestine and Her Lady.
So we walked, city folk of Jerusalem and Nazareth, Bethlehem and Jaffa,
peasants from Taybeh and Abboud, and nuns and monks and priests, waving
palm branches and calling Hosanna, and it looked like Birnham Wood coming
to Dunsinane...
-
- Home Page of Israel Shamir
- http://www.israelshamir.net
|
