- Last week heterosexuals
came under attack in many places. In Ontario, courts granted gays permission
to marry creating a contentious national rift. In Vancouver, parents narrowly
blocked homosexual activists from placing their books on kindergarten curriculum.
- The American Psychiatric Association came under heavy
pressure to remove pedophilia from its list of mental disorders.
Newsweek featured (same-sex couples attending their high school proms.)
"Instead of sparking controversy, schools are saying, whatís
the big deal?" http://www.msnbc.com/news/924401.asp?0bl=-0
- The campaign to change society's sexual norm is intensifying.
Straights need to realize that they are under siege from big government
and big business.
- The vast majority of homosexuals are good people who
want to be left alone. Homosexual organizations, however, are created
and funded by elite foundations and corporations to destroy the heterosexual
fabric of society. http://dianedew.com/gayles.htm (I will expand on the
reasons next week.)
- Gay activists pretend they are seeking "tolerance"
and "equality." But privately they admit that their hidden agenda
is to reshape society in their own image. They don't care how much harm
- "The end goal of the feminist revolution is the
elimination of the sex distinction itself," says Shulamith Firestone
(The Dialectic of Sex, 1972, p.11)
- "Heterosexual hegemony is being eroded,"
writes Gary kinsman. "The forms of sexuality considered natural have
been socially created and can be socially transformed." (The Regulation
of Desire: Sexuality in Canada, 1987, p.219)
- "In a free society, everyone will be gay,"
writes Allen Young, a pioneer of the Gay Liberation Movement. (John D'Emilio,
Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America, p.322)
- "In one sense the right is right." says gay
historian Jonathan Katz: if gay and lesbian liberationists ever achieve
full equality, they will do away with the social need for the hetero/homo
division. The secret of the most moderate, mainstream gay and lesbian civil
rights movement is its radically transformative promise (or threat, depending
on your values). (The Invention of Heterosexuality, 1995, p.188.) Emphasis
- THE GAY FEMINIST ONSLAUGHT
- Gay and feminist activists have found common cause because
they both insist male-female distinctions are artificial (ignoring all
scientific evidence to the contrary.) While many heterosexuals consider
themselves "feminists", feminism is a homosexual movement. It
believes that men and women are not only equal but also the same; and only
social conditioning makes us different. Homosexuality is love of the same.
- Today, gay and feminist activists want "people"
to make love to "people" regardless of their sex. They depict
normal heterosexual behavior as pathological. Men are abusers and the heterosexual
family is oppressive. They think the way to social justice is to abolish
heterosexuality altogether. Isn't this "hatred?"
- Illuminati-Marxism spawned both the Gay and Woman's liberation
movements by transferring Marxist class conflict to gender. The "patriarchy"
(male-dominated heterosexual family) is the root of all evil and must be
destroyed ("transformed"). Women (the proletariat) and anyone
else deemed "oppressed" (gays, certain favoured minorities) must
be handed position and power on a silver platter.
- The Illuminati's "revolutionary" goal is the
"new world order" or authoritarian socialism run by monopoly
capital. It is big government in the service of big business, left in the
service of right.
- It always was. In the words of US Communist leader Bella
Dodd the rich sponsored the Communist Party. They sponsor homosexuality
and feminism to "destroy the bourgeois family" and create "new
types of human beings who would conform."
- Why have straights passively endured this attack?
- 1) The gay-feminists have waged their war with impunity
by asserting their victim status. Straights can't even defend their own
sexuality for fear of accusations of "homophobia" and "sexism."
These days anyone who does not want to be gay is homophobic.
- 2) Typical Marxists, they practiced deceit successfully.
They attracted widespread support by pretending to champion women when
in fact they always had a revolutionary homosexual agenda. Now politicians
and media are in massive denial because they have empowered these radicals
and even put them in charge of education. The situation is comparable to
the liberal refusal in the 1940's and 1950's to admit the government was
riddled with Soviet Spies. This was part of the same phenomenon of Rockefeller
- TEACHING CHILDREN TO BE GAY
- Many public schools virtually "break the ice"
for gays. For example, the Grade Seven curriculum in Ontario introduces
12-year-old children to oral and anal sex.
- Phyllis Benedict, president of the Ontario Elementary
Teacher's Federation said the union is "trying to promote a more positive
[homosexual] environment in schools." (National Post, Aug.16, 2001)
- This extends to undermining the heterosexual family by
reading books like "Aasha's Moms" and "Two Dads, Brown Dads,
- On the other hand, heterosexuality is virtually a taboo.
Our children's textbooks have been rewritten to eliminate any hint that
men and women might be different, live in traditional families, or behave
in "stereotypical" ways.
- As a university lecturer, I tried to teach novelists
like D.H. Lawrence who portrayed male-female love in positive terms. I
was accused of "sexual harassment" by feminist activists and
lost my job. (Sexual harassment is now defined as anything that makes a
radical feminist uncomfortable.)
- As heterosexuals, we cannot explore our sexuality because
homosexuals may be "uncomfortable." This has led to the demoralization
of society. We cannot celebrate men as masculine and women as feminine.
We do not celebrate heterosexual love, the greatest gift that life offers
- This daily denial of our sexual identity amounts to persecution.
It used to be 'live and let live.' Now gay and feminist activists will
not let us live.
- In an episode of the TV show Friends, Rachel avoids paying
a speeding fine by flirting with the handsome traffic cop. Ross takes the
steering wheel and is stopped for driving too slowly. Ross tries to flirt
with the male cop. The message is that we can all go both ways, even the
cop. This is the reality behind the gay activist demand for "equality".
It is no longer enough to tolerate them; we must become them. It doesn't
matter if we are comfortable as long as they are. See also Pat Buchanan's
"Mainstreaming Deviancy" http://www.theamericancause.org/patmainstreamingdeviancyprint.htm
- SOVIET-STYLE THOUGHT CRIME
- In Rochester, N.Y., Rolf Szabo, a 23-year employee
of Eastman Kodak Co. was fired because he objected to a pro-homosexual
office memo. He did not adhere to the company's so-called "Winning
& Inclusive Culture" designed to promote "diversity."
This example of Soviet-style thought crime is not isolated. http://www.cnsnews.com/Culture/Archive/200208/CUL20020802b.html
- Homosexual behaviour makes straights uncomfortable. Most
men viscerally find the sight of two men kissing repulsive.
- Gay families are not the same as ours. The adoption of
straight children by gays denies the children's natural instincts and distorts
their psychological development. In 20 years they will be suing the government
for millions of dollars.
- Gay marriages are different from heterosexual marriages,
and should have a separate status. Gay marriage deliberately distorts our
perceptions of ourselves. As Katz says, the "secret" purpose
is to "do away with the social need for the hetero/homo division
- In conclusion, it's time to recognize that homo and heterosexuality
are in fierce competition. The gay model does not fit heterosexuals and
vice-versa. There can only be one model. Will ours be a heterosexual society
that tolerates a 4% gay minority?
- Or, will it be a homosexual society that persecutes a
96% straight majority? History has many examples of minorities that have
persecuted majorities. Take Communism for example.
- If straights don't establish the norms, gay activists
will. When gay/feminist activists demand "equality," they are
demanding that one model fit all. They are saying that we are the same.
We are not.
- Rejecting the homosexual model is not "intolerance"
or "hatred." It is defending our natural birthright, and our
- Heterosexual society is the victim of an insidious form
of persecution called psychological warfare. The real "haters"
are gay-feminist activists, and the elite politicians, media, corporations
and foundations that sustain them.
- Henry Makow is the inventor of the board game "Scruples"
and author of "A Long Way to go for a Date." His articles
on feminism and
Henry Makow's article on Heterosexual Society Under Siege is a distortion
of truth. Heterosexuals are not being attacked and injured and killed
for being heterosexual as are homosexuals and bisexuals. They do not lose
jobs and housing by marrying a woman. Also its not true that the lesbians
among the more extreme feminists speak for most gay men, there often has
been division between radical feminists and gay men in homosexual organizations.
The implication is that homosexuality and bisexuality are unnatural, yet
Zoologists know that virtually all social mammals and social birds demonstrate
homosexual behavior fairly frequently. (See the book Biological Exuberance
by biologist Bruce Bagemihl).
To equate gay rights with the right wing fascist billionaire elite taking
over the world with monopolistic economic globalism is absurd. Places like
San Francisco are a hot bed of opposition to economic globalism. You generally
have very useful info that the Big Business media outlets block and I praise
you for that. But apparently you have a bias against homosexuals and bisexuals.
Fundamentalist Judaism began the bigotry against gays probably because
of some ancient sexual disease going through the Middle East at the time.
A health issue was turned into religious superstition.
Fundamentalist monotheists often say that all religion opposes homosexuality.
Yet the oldest school of Buddhism, the Southern Buddhist Theravada religion
which is considered to have one of the most strict moral codes and called
too conservative by some for that reason has no prohibition against homosexual
behavior among non-monastic unmarried adults. Polygamy was acceptable
also as long as you had permission from your wife to get another wife.