- WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A
federal appeals court on Tuesday overturned a U.S. ban that prohibited
testing pesticides on humans, opening the door for renewed debate on the
practice.
-
- The D.C. District Court of Appeals said that a directive
by the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) in December 2001 constituted
a binding regulation because it was issued without notice or the opportunity
for public comment and therefore should be overruled.
-
- The court reinstated the EPA's previous practice of considering
third-party human studies, until the agency gathers public comment and
issues a formal rule, a process that can take months or years.
-
- Environmental groups said the ruling revives an ethical
debate over whether chemical makers should test some products on humans
to convince the EPA of their safety.
-
- Erik Olson, attorney with the Natural Resources Defense
Council, said the ruling "muddies the water" on human testing.
-
- "We are very concerned that with EPA Administrator
(Christine) Whitman leaving right now. The Bush administration may use
this as an opening to accept unethical tests on humans," Olson said.
-
- "There are a bunch of human studies that companies
have done, which they may now ask the EPA to accept. There will be enormous
political pressure on the EPA," he added.
-
- Whitman, who resigned effective at the end of June, said
in a December 2001 press release that the agency would no longer consider
human test data submitted by pesticide companies. At the same time, the
EPA asked the National Academy of Sciences for recommendations on whether
such data should be allowed.
-
- CropLife America, a trade group for chemical firms, filed
a lawsuit to challenge the EPA ban. The group contends human test data
can help determine pesticide safety and ensure that products needed by
farmers are not overly restricted.
-
- "Human clinical trials with pesticides are conducted
to help refine the parameters and limits of risk and to increase the confidence
in risk assessment so that risks are not underestimated or overestimated,"
said Jay Vroom, president of CropLife America.
-
- That means pesticide usage can be better calibrated for
safety and to produce high crop yields, Vroom added.
-
- EPA officials had no immediate comment on the ruling.
-
- Human testing of pesticides and insecticides is permitted
in other countries, although it is unclear how widely it is used. The U.S.
National Academy of Sciences is scheduled to issue its human testing recommendations
at the end of 2003.
-
-
-
- Copyright © 2003 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.
Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited
without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable
for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance
thereon.
|
