Rense.com




Would You Take
A Bullet For A Feminist?
Power, Love And Self-Sacrifice

By Henry Makow, PhD
7-20-3


Last week, a young Israeli died protecting his girl friend from a knife-wielding Palestinian. The police spokesman said he absorbed the attacker's blows with his body, ultimately collapsing on top of his girlfriend who was unscathed physically. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/946633/posts
 
The young man made the supreme sacrifice. His was the supreme act of love.
 
Men instinctively protect their own. But feminists don't belong to any man and make a point of being independent. If you were married to one, would you sacrifice your life for her? If society put your children under her jurisdiction, would you die for them?
 
The answers have broader implications. Would you support her if she were incapacitated? Would you do unpleasant work day-after-day to support her children? If not, would there be any point in dying for your country? Feminism clearly sabotages the social contract, which is heterosexual by nature.
 
By "feminism" I am not talking about women receiving equal opportunity (in fact, they often receive preferential treatment.) I am talking about a bogus gender ideology that the financial elite is using to destabilize and depopulate society. This ideology denies the natural differences between men and women, encouraging women to behave like men and vice versa.
Here I will elaborate on my ideas about heterosexuality. I do not wish to impose a one-size-fit-all model. I am presenting another paradigm in opposition to official feminist dogma. Let the truth be the ultimate arbitrator. Everyone must discover it for him or herself.
POSSESSION
 
If you want to get a man's attention, give him power. A man will not sacrifice himself for woman or family unless they belong to him, i.e. are part of him.
 
Feminism has made the idea of a man "possessing" a woman distinctly unfashionable but this is exactly what both sexes actually want. It mirrors the sex act.
 
As I have said, the heterosexual contract involves the exchange of female power for male love. If she has chosen wisely, a woman will receive more love as she completely surrenders herself. Self-sacrifice is how women show love. Men feel this and it inspires their love. Female love takes the form of faith, patience, acceptance, adaptability, support and much more.
 
For a man, I suspect power (and the responsibility and trust it implies) is the most satisfying aspect of his relationship.
On the other hand, the more power a woman demands, the less male love she will receive. Feminists are consigning many women to lives of bitterness and solitude.
 
Feminists will say I am portraying male tyranny but I am not. A loving man nurtures his wife and wants her to flourish. He tries to please her. He consults her. She is in charge of certain domains, which aren't necessarily traditional. She has her own personality, work and views. For example, my wife doesn't agree with many of my views.
 
Nevertheless my wife adjusts to me. I feel free. She has made all other women redundant and freed me to pursue my work. Miraculously, she is happy too.
 
 
PUTTING WOMEN ON A PEDESTAL
 
To surrender power for love is feminine. When men try to do it, women lose respect.
 
Women unconsciously seek to be overwhelmed by a man. So when a man puts her on a pedestal (because he wants sex or love) he is defeating himself.
Women are naturally hypergamous: they seek men with greater power or status. A man will succeed if he finds a woman who looks up to him. He can keep her respect by providing responsible firm leadership. He should cut his losses if she proves difficult. If you want to get a woman's attention, show her the door.
A man must have a dream that is independent of a woman but involves her. According to psychiatrist Helene Deutsch, ("The Psychology of Women," 1948) women are masochistic-narcissistic. They want to be put to use as wives and mothers, and loved for their sacrifice. They want to be needed.
 
A woman's most important decision is her choice of a man. Her life will be based on his dream for better or for worse. He must have a vision of life, and she had better like it or not marry him.
 
It is tragic to see young women squandering their innocence on men who only want sex. Beauty is based on love and trust. If young women understood this, they would preserve their innocence.
 
CONCLUSION
 
The financial elite is creating the new world police state using a bogus war on terror and a bogus gender ideology. Men and women can partly thwart this assault by having families based on healthy and natural heterosexual principles.
 
Male-female love is the closest most of us come to knowing God. (That is why we are so obsessed with it.) Love involves different self-sacrifice for females and males. When a woman gives herself to the right man, they are able to move mountains together.
 
 
Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of "A Long Way to go for a Date." His articles on feminism and the new world order appear on his web site www.savethemales.ca He enjoys receiving your comments at henry@savethemales.ca
 
 
 
Comment
From Alex
7-22-3
 
Makow says of his wife: "Miraculously, she is happy too." Yes, it is miraculous. That man is not only flatly incorrect on most points, he is also deeply disturbed.
 
Alex

 
Comment
From Sheryl Jackson
moonfyre1@earthlink.net

I read every word that Mr. Makow has to write about feminism.
 
He wants to blame everyone on the planet for the problems that men have created for themselves.
 
Who came up with the look of the New Millennium Womyn? The TV thin, wraith that I consider to be Modern Auschwitz Womyn? Who came up with the unrealistic ideal of what a womyn should be? It was not feminists, as we tell ALL womyn they are beautiful and that whatever size they are is okay. However, since most womyn today are trying to juggle jobs, home activities and being a wife, we really don't have much time to look like the trophy who shuts up and does what she is told. Told what to do and surrendering herself to man? Yeh, right, after paying all of the bills, buying the groceries, being a chauffeur to the family, taking care of the local grandparents, and volunteering for the FHA or FFA and staying up late to help with homework, housecleaning or just plain taking care of ill family members.
 
We go to work where we have mean bosses, mean co-workers, and irritating rules that are haphazardly enforced according to the whim or mood of the usually White Male boss who may be hungover, angry at his wife or girlfriend or just plain likes making others miserable.
 
We make less for doing more. We do not get too many raises or promotions because we work so hard they could probably not replace us, or if they could it would take to long to train someone to do what we know to do after ten years in the same job.
 
Corporations found out that wymyn would work faster, harder and cleaner than most of the men that were hired. To keep up the Myth of Masculine Superiority, men become the bosses because of their lack of job skills to be productive workers. Then in the seventies the Korporations found out that minorities also worked harder, faster and cleaner. Someone then decided that there should be x amount of workers that were minorities. Of course, wymyn were a minority. But that was not really addressed by the White Male Managers. They came up with minority choices for promotions because most of the minorities were college educated. The choice for promotion became "Billy Bob, is my best friend, but he sure is stupid. That Philippino man is college educated and he will make me look smart." Next, uh, gee, Billy Bob, I really wanted to promote you, but I have to fill a quota of minorities. Sorry.
 
Feminists just want jobs, a lack of harassment from managers and co-workers. Go in do the work, go home and do more work. That is the life of most feminists in this country. We are not trying to usurp anyone's "authority", we just want to be free to go home from work, without feeling our job is in jeopardy daily. To be able to raise our children whose father walked out to find himself and start a new family in another state. So the womyn is left holding the bag and the kids. No child support there. Just the Big Daily Grind, never enough money, or food or clothes for the kids and nothing for Mom for years at a time.
 
We just want to be who we are without feeling we need to have a lame man around to make us feel good about ourselves. Trying to meet an unrealistic body image keeps many womyn from having men around, because most men want a sexual fantasy to assure themselves of their virility. And who wants to look emaciated or like a sharecroppers wife, like the Rich and UNDESERVING? These are people who find joy in denying themselves the comfort of food and the roundness of a womyn's true body. They have personal trainers, private chefs, and can go to spas for weeks at a time. Most American wymyn would just like to have a one hour bubble bath at home for relaxation.
 
The Krap that Mr. Makow writes is as unrealistic for men to read and try to adhere to as it is for wymyn to achieve. Most men do not have the finances of the good Mr. Makow and his boardgame. His advice is not practical, practicable, or realistic for most of the men and wymyn of this country. Men who read it, already are feeling bad about their lives and their lack of love.
Wymyn who read it are already wondering where have all the "good men" gone?
 
So, if you really want to have a womyn in your life and you want to know how to treat them, join the PromiseKeepers, or get the tapes by Reverend Smalley, who can teach men how to be in control without brutality to make a point. How to nurture and feed a relationship with a real live human female. How to have a good relationship and to feel that they and their mates are really okay.

Disclaimer





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros