Rense.com



Bush Says CO2 Is Not A
Pollutant - HUH?

By Andrew Gumbel
The Independent - UK
8-31-03


LOS ANGELES -- The Bush administration has decreed that carbon dioxide from industrial emissions - the main cause of global warming - is not a pollutant.
 
The decision by the Environmental Protection Agency - announced with minimal fanfare on the eve of the Labor Day weekend - reverses the stance taken under President Clinton and allows industry to increase emissions with impunity.
 
It is also part of a pattern of casting doubt on scientific evidence, going back to the US's rejection of the Kyoto Protocols in 2001. Earlier this year, the Bush administration excised a 28-page section on climate change from an EPA report. It also ignored a report by the US Academy of Sciences that argued that the evidence of climate change could not be ignored.
 
"Saying that carbon dioxide does not cause global warming is like refusing to say smoking causes lung cancer," said Melissa Carey, a climate change expert with the advocacy group Environmental Defense.
 
Environmental groups are now considering suing the EPA to force the regulation of greenhouse gases.
 
The Bush administration appears to be guided by a leaked memo by the political consultant Frank Luntz, which advised: "Should the public believe that the scientific issues are settled, their views about global warming will change accordingly. Therefore, you need to make the lack of scientific certainty a primary issue in the debate."
 
© 2003 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd
 
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=438719
 
 
 
Comment From Anonymous
8-31-3
 
 
This is one item that, unlike anything else, I will agree upon with the Bush Administration. How can these environmentalists possibly believe that commercial carbon dioxide gas emissions are affecting (or have the potential to affect) the global climate? Has chemtrail fallout so eroded the average person's intellect that nobody bothers to consider how every living thing on this planet is continuously exhaling carbon dioxide 24 hours per day?
 
With 6 billion humans -- and countless trillions of animals, ranging in lung capacity from elephants to gnats -- exhaling carbon dioxide each second of every day, there surely is more biologically-produced carbon dioxide being pumped into the atmosphere per second than all of the world's commercial emitters could ever produce in a month.
 
There is a word which describes what the environmentalists are doing here. "Sophistry." Sophistry is defined as "a deliberately invalid argument displaying ingenuity in reasoning with the hope of deceiving someone; reasoning sound in appearance only." Literally, something that appears sensical superficially, but which is actually a lie.
 
- Anonymous
 
"Men are apt to suffer their minds to be misled by fallacies which gratify their passions. Many persons have obscured and confounded the nature of things by their wretched sophistry; though an act be never so sinful, they will strip it of its guilt."

Comment
 
From Sheryl Jackson
moonfyre1@earthlink.net
9-1-3
 
The sophistry being played out here is not from the environmentalists, but by the anonymous idiot who does not want to hear from his constituent humans regarding his fallacious assumptions being presented here.
 
In the correct proportion of CO2 and Oxygen production there is, of course, no pollution. However, the trees of the world's rain forests and the remaining trees and plants on the planet are not able to absorb and convert the massive CO2 that is disproportionately being produced. This is also coupled by the many blights that are affecting the forests and plants of the earth with a very devastating effect of them trying to survive more than they are able to provide oxygen. This is a chilling reality that Anonymous is not paying attention to, as he strives to make people believe what he wants them to believe.
 
And leave us not forget the Monsters of Monsanto and their Genetically Modified crops that are killing the good bacterium of the dirt they grow in, rendering the dirt useless for all plants except for the SuperWeeds that are now thriving. So that ultimately the earth will have more dead dirt than healthy dirt.
 
So lets see how this works: genetically modified crops kill the dirt. Nothing can grow there. Forest fires often set intentionally by man, destroy forests and trees and plants faster than they can grow to provide more oxygen. Elms, pines and oaks around the world are being killed by blights that are probably from some lab, that we will not know about because of the high rate of "suicide" among the many biologists who work on these things.
 
Many trees of Europe and America, and in South America and even Indonesia have been destroyed by fire faster than the trees can grow and provide oxygen. There are less trees now and more CO2. Therefore there is not the correct mathematical proportion for absorption. when the CO2 gets worse, the oxygen will get less.
 
Therefore, you will have pollution that causes global warming. But then Mr. Anonymous does not wish to hear any of this. What a hoot. And how sad that so many people who read what he writes will believe him and not what they KNOW to be true. Nobody is doing the math.
 
No brainer, here.
 
Sheryl Jackson

 

Disclaimer





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros