Rense.com



America Counts The Cost
Of Nicotine Addiction

By Paul Simao
9-8-3

=ATLANTA (Reuters) -- At least 8.6 million Americans are living with chronic bronchitis, emphysema and other serious smoking-related illnesses, according to a new study that paints a dark picture of the health risks posed by tobacco.
 
The study, the first to estimate the number of people in the United States who have serious lung disorders or other diseases caused by cigarettes, was published by the Centres for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention on Thursday.
 
Researchers said the findings underscored a need to expand anti-tobacco programmes and increase surveillance of smoking habits in the nation. There are about 46.5 million smokers in the United States.
 
The CDC considers cigarette smoking to be the leading preventable cause of death in the nation. About 440,000 people die each year from lung cancer and other diseases related to tobacco use.
 
The new study found that more than 4.5 million smokers and non-smokers reported having chronic bronchitis in 2000, making it the most prevalent disease in these groups. Bronchitis is often marked by a steady, recurrent cough.
 
More than three million people said they had emphysema; symptoms of which include chronic shortness of breath.
 
But Terry Pechacek, the CDC's associate director of science, said those estimates were conservative because they relied to a large degree on self-reporting by respondents who participated in various surveys.
 
"Many smokers are in some degree of denial, so we know that this is an underestimate," Pechacek told Reuters.
 
In addition to highlighting the enormous human cost of cigarette smoking, the study noted that smoking was costing the nation $75-billion (about R525-billion) in direct medical costs and $82-billion (about R574-billion) in lost productivity each year.
 
The study comes at a time when casual smoking appears to be on the rise in the nation.
 
Anti-smoking advocates say the human and economic costs of smoking could be dramatically reduced if authorities clamped down on tobacco advertising and raised taxes on cigarettes to make them less affordable, particularly to young people.
 
"We know how to prevent so much of this tobacco-caused disease and death but public officials have not passed the policies or devoted the resources to get the job done," said Vince Willmore, a spokesperson for the Washington-based anti-tobacco group Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.
 
©2003. All rights strictly reserved.
 
Comment
From Jim
9-9-3
 
Dear Jeff,
 
I would like to respond to "America Counts The Cost Of Nicotine Addiction" by Paul Simao, if I may:
 
Of course the antismoking brigades know how to "get the job done." Let me count the ways: give Boards of Health special powers whereby only 2 people may pass a law that forbids smoking in all public places, under the guise of protecting public health.
 
And, what's a "public place"? Anything they say it is.
 
What's "protecting public health"? Like the man said: "you ain't seen nuthin yet, folks."
 
Slap fines of $400 for a first offense; $1,000 for each subsequent offense.
 
Establish police forces (or just use the tobacco control forces) to snoop on and ferret out possible places where smokers might try to sneak a cigarette. Any smoker that gets away is lost revenue to the state; and the state has a mighty big deficit.
 
Police have been trained to have no sympathy for smokers; in 1988 this state passed a law that any police officer will be fired on the spot for smoking -on or off duty. In fact, they're so fanatical that one officer was recently fired based on an anonymous letter. For drug addictions and alcohol they have counseling and help programs; for smoking tobacco, a boot in the ass out the door.
 
Recently in Randolph, Massachusetts, a town meeting was held on whether the People desired to ban smoking in all public places. The proposal was soundly defeated 128 to 58. But the Randolph Board of Health simply ignored the will of the People, and banned smoking anyway.
 
Also last year in the "comradewealth" of Massachusetts, the legislature doubled the cigarette tax to 151 cents per pack, the highest in the land. This made the antismoking forces very happy citing the usual thing about children and prevention. But not only did they raise the tax to the highest in the country, they passed additional laws to force smokers to buy their cigarettes within the comradewealth. A recent article in the newspapers relayed how the state's Department of Revenue is actively trying to collect back taxes that internet users "evaded". Their methods will involve seizing property and garnishing wages.
 
In fact, one Democratic state senator has proposed that anyone caught buying cigarettes out of state be fined $5,000.
 
I guess this is how they think when under the delusion that only Republicans smoke.
 
Many schools have giant signs warning that smoking is not allowed on "school property". School property? The last I knew, my real estate taxes paid for the school. But accommodation does not seem to be of interest to them unless it's them trying to get it. Then it becomes a matter of "civil rights" or such.
 
But speaking of civil rights, I'm very curious why at least one of this country's surfeit of lawyers hasn't brought a class action suit against the antismoking forces, their lawyers, and the political party that supports them for conspiracy to violate the civil rights of smokers. From my perspective, this should be the easiest thing to prove since there are countless examples.
 
I doubt this action would make them any more accommodating in their philosophy, but at least it might help slow them down before they go bonkers with the next step of denying smokers medical attention or other nefarious actions which are only too easy to predict.

 

Disclaimer





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros