- Dear Mr. Rense,
-
- Australia as a democracy is GONE.
-
- Pauline Hanson went to jail as a political prisoner on
a technicality in which the government has invented a new interpretation
of the law.
-
- Hanson went to jail with her #2 party man David Ettridge.
-
- I am enclosing a letter from his brother to the Governor
General
- who is the #1 citizen of Australia and representing the
Queen.
-
- I do not expect the Governor General to do anything as
he and all of our political parties(except Hanson's party) are part of
the NWO-Bush structure. For your information, the former Governor General
was forced to resign recently after admitting protecting pedophiles priests
as head of the Anglican church in Australia.
-
- In spite of all that he refused to resign, until, a women
testified that he raped her too.
- Then, he agreed to resign....mysteriously, she 'committed
suicide' within few days.
-
- I hope our PM will not visit your President in the future,
anytime they meet- a war is starting somewhere.
-
- Regards,
-
- Susan Lovejoy
- Sydney
- Australia
-
- http://www.forums.onenation.com.au/index.php?act=ST&f=21
- &t=476&s=8fc0bcba3e7ed2317b822afad1af436c
-
- QUOTE (James Ettridge - Letter to Australian Govenor
General)
-
- 24/08/2003
-
- His Excellency, Major General Michael Jeffery, AC, CVO,
MC (Retd)
- Government House
- Canberra.
- ACT 2600
-
- Dear General Jeffery,
-
- I believe that you should be made aware, that in the
high profile case against Pauline Hanson's One Nation, and David Ettridge,
that it can be proved that some members of the Liberal Party, and some
members of the Labor Party have conspired to remove the Australian Democracy,
and replace it with a two party system, which tolerates minor other parties.
Members of the Judiciary, and various Government Officials have used their
positions to conspire against the Australian Constitution and prevent some
Australian voters from voting for the party of their choice.
-
- The Charge sheet ( Complaint ñ Sworn and Summons
) against Pauline Lee Hanson and David William Ettridge read:
-
- Charge 1. Charged conjointly with Pauline Lee Hanson.
That on the 4th day of December 1997 at Brisbane in the State of Queensland
Pauline Lee Hanson and David William Ettridge dishonestly gained a benefit
or advantage namely the registration of an organisation known as Pauline
Hanson's One Nation as a political party under the Electoral Act 1992 (Qld)
for themselves."
-
- Then looking at the Queensland ìElectoral Act
1992 - sect 3 in the definitions 3. In this Act -
- 'parliamentary party' means a political party of which
at least 1 member is a member of an Australian parliament.
-
- 'registrable political party' means a political party
that -
-
- (a) either:
- (i) is a parliamentary party; or
- (ii) has at least 500 members who are electors; and
-
- (B) is established on the basis of a written constitution
( however described ) that sets out the aims of the party.'
-
- There is no doubt that with Pauline Lee Hanson being
the elected Federal Member for Oxley that they were a parliamentary party.
Therefore Pauline Hanson`s One Nation was a registrable political party
within the definition of section 3 of the Queensland Electoral Act 1992.
-
- What else were they expected to do ????
-
- The courts continue to ignore this fact Why ???
-
- In Sharples v O'Shea & Anor [1998] QSC 171 (31 August
1998), an Interlocutory injunction before Mr Justice Ambrose (internet
version) ì the party was a Queensland parliamentary party within
the definition of s.3 Whatever may have been the position prior to the
election, after eleven members of that party had been elected to Parliament,
it seems to me that it would be very difficult to assert that subsequent
to the election, the party was not a Queensland parliamentary party - whether
or not it then had at least 500 members who were electors.'
-
- David claimed an Estoppel that the party was a Queensland
Parliamentary Party, but the judges simply ignored his claims and they
were not addressed.
-
- An Application to the High Court of Australia No. B86/2002
is being pursued, but
- since a member of the High Court justice Heydon J refused
the Application for an Injunction, commenting that it had little chance
of success in the High Court of Australia action, the High Court of Australia,
whose duty it is to protect the Australian Constitution, and the freedom
to vote for a political party of their choice, will be seen to be not independent,
but favouring a political party or parties.
-
- In a second reading speech of the Electoral Bill in Hansard.19th
May 1992
- At page 5283. ì Mr Foley ( Yeronga ) (5.11 p.m.
): If the people lose confidence in
- the electoral system, they will take to the streets and
there will be civil disorder. That
- proposition is exemplified well in the case of the Philippines
recently, where Mrs
- Santiago issued a call to the people to take to the streets
because of a lack of public
- confidence in the electoral system. For many years, it
was also the case in Northern
- Ireland where the citizens of Derry, consisting of a
non-Unionist majority, were
- unable to elect a majority on the council which was representative
of their views and
- backgrounds under the electoral system that was then
in operation. I mention these
- examples lest it be thought that these matters of detail,
of administration, are
- somehow academic and remote. They are not.
-
- It is elementary to a democracy that there should be
public confidence in an
- electoral system, which is nothing more than the way
in which the people give power
- to their law makers. In Queensland, that fundamental
link between the people and
- Government was tinkered with over decades and it was
done in a way that eroded
- public confidence in the electoral system.'
-
- In Williams and Others V Spautz High Court of Australia.
[1992] 174 CLR 509
- Quote justice Mason CJ, Dawsn, Toohey and McHugh JJ.
At page 3 item 20.
-
- 'As Lord Scarman said in Reg. V Sang (11) (1980) AC 402,
at p 455., every court is ì in duty bound to protect itself - against
an abuse of its process. -----------. The first is that the public interest
in the administration of justice requires that the court protect its ability
to function as a court of law by ensuring that its processes are used fairly
by State and citizen alike. The second is that, unless the court protects
its ability so to function in that way, its failure will lead to an erosion
of public confidence by reason of concern that the courtís processes
may lend themselves to oppression and injustice. ------ that the Courts
processes are being employed for ulterior purposes or in such a way ---
as to cause improper vexation and oppression.'
-
- There has clearly been a conspiracy, which in the circumstances
I believe is an act of High Treason. Judges have no immunity from prosecution
from a charge of High Treason.
-
- In simple terms the definition of High Treason as I understand
it, is an act to defeat the Constitution,
- (it used to be the Monarchy ) or remove another's lawful
rights given under the Constitution.
-
- We all know that when it is done by the use of force,
by the army, in an army insurrection,
- But it can also be done by using like minded, complying
public Officials and the judiciary to achieve the same result. It achieves
the same result, and is still High Treason.
-
- I know that next ANZAC day, when we honour those who
made the supreme sacrifice, who fought and died, so we could be free to
vote for the political party of our choice, you will be asking yourself
the question, "What did I do when my country needed me, did I make
the effort to restore Democracy?"
-
- David William Ettridge, and Pauline Lee Hanson should
be released from prison in Queensland immediately, as their only crime
was to form a party which achieved a higher vote than the Liberals at the
Queensland elections, giving them more elected members.
- You have been thrown in at the deep end, but claim to
be a man for the people, so please prove it. There is no doubt that you
will be judged on your actions or inactions.
-
- Yours sincerely,
-
- John Patrick Ettridge.
-
-
- Comment
- From Q
- 10-10-3
-
- All of Australia's parties are not NWO's. There is also
the Australia First Party, Australia National Action, and the National
Republicans. All of these are patriotic and moral parties who stand opposed
to the communist/globalist/internationalist/elitist menace that is engulfing
the Western world.
-
- We would also do well to support the only sensible party
in the US, and that is the America First Party.
|
