Rense.com



US Bars Torture Settlement,
To Ex-POWs' Dismay

By Miles Benson
Newhouse News Service
10-30-3

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration is quietly piling up victories in a legal battle to block payments to 17 U.S. combat veterans who were captured and tortured in the first Gulf War and won a suit against Iraq for nearly a billion dollars.
 
The former POWs -- whipped, beaten, burned, electrically shocked and starved by their Iraqi captors in 1991 -- say they are baffled by the administration's refusal to let them collect any of the assets of Iraq now under U.S. control, and by the Justice Department's efforts to overturn a federal court decision upholding their claims to compensation.
 
"I don't understand why they want to see this case go away," said Lt. Col. Dave Storr of Spokane, Wash., one of the POWs who today is an airline pilot and serves in the Air National Guard.
 
"My country can be mistaken," Storr said, "but I'll still serve it and love it. I'm proud to wear the uniform, no matter what comes."
 
In court filings, the government asserts sweeping presidential power to block the claims because of the "weighty foreign policy interests at stake."
 
It does not dispute details of the POWs' suffering.
 
"The United States government fully recognizes the brutal actions to which the plaintiffs here were subjected as they heroically served their country and made sacrifices during the Gulf War in 1991," the Justice Department acknowledges. "Plaintiffs' suffering at the hands of the former Iraqi government officials cannot be excused or forgotten.
 
"Nevertheless, the political branches of our government have decided that, now that the oppressive regime of Saddam Hussein has been removed from power, U.S. sanctions against Iraq based on its support of terrorism must be removed."
 
Navy Lt. Jeffrey Zaun of Cherry Hill was navigator aboard an A-6 Intruder on Jan. 17, 1991, when it was downed by an Iraqi missile. He was captured, and when he refused to provide information to interrogators about his mission and the location of U.S. forces, he was repeatedly karate-chopped in the throat. Kept for weeks in a darkened cell, he was beaten and twice subjected to mock executions. He was held 46 days.
 
Zaun, today a financial analyst for Standard & Poors and a commander in the Naval Reserve, said he isn't surprised that the Bush administration opposes the former POWs' bid for compensation, given what he termed the administration's aversion to tort claims. But they should get over it, he said.
 
"I didn't want to deploy, either, but when they said to go I went," Zaun said. "Sometimes it's necessary to get in these people's faces and take their money. It's a great way to hurt the folks who financed bad guys."
 
The former POWs launched their lawsuit in April 2002 under a 1996 law that allows terrorist nations, so designated by the State Department, to be sued for personal injuries to U.S. nationals, including prisoners of war. They argued that they were tortured in violation of the Geneva Conventions' ban on mistreatment of POWs.
 
Their position was strengthened last November when Congress passed and Bush signed into law a terrorism insurance bill allowing Americans to collect court-ordered compensatory damages from frozen assets of terrorist states.
 
U.S. District Judge Richard Roberts ordered Iraq on July 7 -- three months after the fall of Saddam's regime -- to pay the 17 former POWs and their families $653 million in compensatory damages and $306 million in punitive damages for torturing the men. Roberts ordered a temporary freeze on $653 million in Iraqi assets then held in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, as a source of funds for the settlement.
 
At that point the Justice Department stepped in, asking the judge to throw out the judgment against Iraq.
 
The government's attorneys quoted Ambassador L. Paul Bremer 3rd, the presidential envoy to Iraq: "Restricting these funds as a result of this litigation would affect adversely the ability of the United States to achieve security and stability in the region, would compromise the safety of U.S. forces and Iraqi civilians, and would be harmful to U.S. national security interests."
 
On July 30, Roberts ruled that Bush had the power to prevent the frozen Iraqi funds from being awarded to the ex-POWs. But Roberts refused to overturn his original finding that the men are entitled to compensation from Iraq. He said the Justice Department's motion to have the entire compensation judgment thrown out was "meritless."
 
"It does surprise me a little bit that Bush is not helping," said Jeff Fox of Surfside Beach, S.C., who was held 15 days after his A-10 was shot down over southern Iraq on Feb. 19, 1991. "It sends a very bad message that a commander in chief would place veterans and prisoners of war second behind a foreign nation. Deep down, I think he (Bush) knows very little about it."
 
On Oct. 14, the U.S. Senate passed a nonbinding "sense of Congress" amendment urging the administration to drop all resistance to the claims of the former POWs and help them collect the damage awards from assets of the Saddam regime still controlled by the United States. The amendment, sponsored by Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.), was added to the bill providing $87 billion for U.S. military action and rebuilding in Iraq and Afghanistan.
 
"The pain and terror American POWs endured at the hands of the Iraqi government is unspeakable," Reid said. "We must send a message to would-be tormentors of other governments that if they torture American POWs, they will be held accountable."
 
Copyright 2003 The Star-Ledger.
 
http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index.ssf?/base/news-11/106724106865760.xm l
Disclaimer



MainPage
http://www.rense.com

This Site Served by TheHostPros