Rense.com



Canada's Nuclear Reactors
Won't Get Missile Protection

By Bill Curry
The Ottawa Citizen
10-28-3


The Nuclear Safety Commission has rejected the idea of installing surface-to-air missiles to protect Canada's nuclear facilities, arguing such a measure risks the accidental shooting down of commercial planes.
 
Although the commission had considered the option after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, it was not included yesterday in a host of proposed new security regulations. Instead, the regulations will force operators of nuclear facilities to boost the number of armed guards at reactor sites and construct two new buildings to house the nuclear response force.
 
The new buildings will be erected at Darlington and Pickering, the two nuclear facilities closest to Toronto.
 
Michel Cleroux, a spokesman for the commission, said while it is ultimately up to the Canadian Armed Forces to decide whether to install surface-to-air missiles, the commission has rejected the idea.
 
"What would you really do with a surface-to-air missile?" asked Mr. Cleroux. "Planes fly all the time over (the facilities). It's a major air route ... Who makes these split-second decisions to shoot down a plane? So it's not a very practical or workable solution. How long does it take you before you know that the airliner is coming directly at the nuclear plant?"
 
Mr. Cleroux compared the debate over missiles to that of a proposed no-fly zone, another measure considered unworkable. Instead, planes are required to stay at least 1,000 feet above a facility.
 
"If no one can fly within 60 kilometres of Darlington, what does that mean? You can't use Pearson Airport (in Toronto)," he said. "Your real protection against the use of aircraft as a terrorist instrument is not shooting them down. Your real protection is in controlling the access to aircraft by persons who shouldn't have access."
 
The regulations also avoid any mention of reinforcing the nuclear facilities so that they could withstand the impact of an airplane crash. Mr. Cleroux said the commission is continuing to study that option.
 
A 2001 report by New Scientist magazine estimated that a plane crash could release 44 times more radioactivity than the Chernobyl disaster.
 
The proposed new rules formalize interim security measures introduced after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and provide significant detail as to how Canada intends to protect its nuclear facilities.
 
The regulations call for enhanced security screening for members of the soon-to-be permanent nuclear response forces, including background, police and security checks.
 
The regulations also require Canada's nuclear facilities to purchase explosives detectors and X-ray machines to screen vehicles and people visiting the facilities and to ensure two separate security systems are in place to detect intruders.
 
According to the regulations, the guards must wear bulletproof vests and have access to night-vision goggles. A recent job posting in Chalk River revealed the armed guards must have a high school diploma or equivalent, as well as knowledge of sociology and contemporary social problems and excellent communication skills.
 
In her description of regulations in the Canada Gazette, Eileen Boyd, the assistant clerk of the Privy Council, states the host of increased security measures "would serve as a model for developing countries that possess nuclear substances" for the protection of nuclear sites from terrorists.
 
Negotiations over the new measures have taken place over the course of the past year. Ms. Boyd states that the operators of the nuclear facilities had objected to the undisclosed high cost of implementing the measures, but were now onside.
 
http://www.canada.com/national/story.asp?id=ED885AC0-
1AA3-44D3-8773-583330C4FD6C


Disclaimer



MainPage
http://www.rense.com

This Site Served by TheHostPros