Rense.com



The Spy Who Was Left
Out In The Cold

By Gary Webb Asia Tim es
http://www.atimes.com
11-6-3


SACRAMENTO -- As far as can be told, former Federal Bureau of Investigation agent Lok Lau may be a genuine American hero, the first agent in FBI history to penetrate the top levels of the Chinese government. But the US Department of Justice is doing everything in its power - and some things that aren't - to prevent even the tiniest detail of Lau's highly classified work from becoming public.
 
As far as the Justice Department is concerned, Lau is nothing more than a lying, thieving malcontent who was fired for shoplifting $15 worth of merchandise from a California supermarket. And that's the way the US government would like to keep it.
 
The full truth about Lok Lau and his six-year-long foreign-counterintelligence mission may never be known. But judging from information that briefly became public as a result of an employment-discrimination suit Lau filed against the FBI - and the Justice Department's frantic efforts to purge the public record of what it claims were national-security secrets "illegally" divulged by Lau and his lawyers - the 46-year-old Singapore native was involved in some very heavy, very clandestine and very dangerous work inside the People's Republic of China, on behalf of US intelligence, for years.
 
It is also clear that once Lau's highly praised undercover assignment was completed, the FBI decided he was a liability and began a concerted effort to get rid of him, which it eventually did.
 
Why the FBI turned with such vengeance against an agent its own director had personally commended for heroism is not known, but it wasn't because Lok Lau wasn't good at his job. If anything, his problem might have been that he was too good at it.
 
That Lau - who worked for the FBI as a special agent (SA) from 1986 until 2000 - is the possessor of powerful secrets is beyond dispute; it is a matter that has troubled the FBI for some years, records show. Lau was considered so hot that in 1998 the FBI decided it could never put him on a witness stand because of "the extremely sensitive nature of SA Lau's assignment".
 
A year later, as the Bureau contemplated firing Lau, FBI headquarters asked its National Security Division in a secret memo "to conduct an additional evaluation of the damage that might result if, as seems likely, the circumstances of this Agent's career are publically [sic] disclosed". One option the memo raised was to buy Lau's silence with "a settlement that would preclude litigation and require confidentiality on the part of the Agent and his attorneys". The FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility agreed. "Significant damage would be done if information related to his [deleted] work were revealed," a 1999 memo stated. "It may be in the best interest of the FBI to avoid litigation if possible."
 
The results of the FBI's damage estimate are still secret and Lau is forbidden by law to speak of his mission, which is also still classified. But in 2000 Lau was fired and has since been publicly branded by the Justice Department as a liar and a thief. Though the shoplifting charge was eventually dismissed for insufficient evidence, the FBI argued that Lau had been dishonest and was therefore unworthy of being an FBI agent. After losing his US$81,000-a-year job, Lau sued the FBI, claiming racial discrimination, and the case dragged through the court system unnoticed for more than a year.
 
In mid-October, however, a reporter for the San Antonio Business Journal called the US Attorney's Office in Sacramento and asked for a comment on a declaration Lau had made in the case. Within days, the Justice Department stormed into federal court, demanded a private meeting with the judge, and persuaded him on national-security grounds to black out every mention of Lau's work in China, both from his declaration and in a friend-of-the-court brief filed by the League of United Latin American Citizens, a Texas anti-discrimination group.
 
Then it sought the judge's permission to seize any computers that might have a copy of Lau's secrets on their hard drives - and to erase them. That order, which was declined, was written broadly enough to have covered not only the computers used by Lau and his lawyers, but those of a Texas journalist covering the Lau story, the League of United Latin American Citizens, and the California First Amendment Coalition, a newspaper-industry advocacy group that had publicized the Justice Department's strange actions.
 
"What's extraordinary is that the government, in this case, succeeded in sealing something that had been on the public record for three weeks," said Terry Francke, the First Amendment Coalition's general counsel.
 
Though the Justice Department had asked for and been denied permission to seize all paper copies of Lau's declaration from anyone who had it, Lau's lawyers and his support group in Texas all received phone calls from the Sacramento US Attorney's Office asking for the papers back. Lau's lawyers complied; the Texas anti-discrimination group refused.
 
"I said show me a court order," said Julie Marquez, who handles criminal-justice issues for the San Antonio-based organization. "Even though the judge specifically told them they couldn't go out and get these papers, they were still calling people up and telling them to give them back."
 
The First Amendment Coalition posted uncensored copies of those documents on its website, prompting the Justice Department to return to court and ask for an electronic search-and-destroy order. And, coincidentally, while all of this was going on, the offices of Lau's psychologist were burglarized and computer equipment was taken.
 
The obvious question is: What is so explosive about Agent Lau's work that, despite the passage of a dozen years, its merest mention causes the Justice Department to react so stridently?
 
Francke and others believe the FBI may be trying to conceal the role it played in a foreign intelligence operation, because Lau's activities in China were either illegal or unauthorized. While it is true that the FBI is confined by law to domestic - not foreign - counterintelligence, there is one specific instance in which it is perfectly legal for FBI agents to be used as international spies: when it's being done "in coordination with the CIA". President Ronald Reagan authorized that in the early 1980s in an executive order, 12333, which is still in effect today. That means Lau's mission was either illegal or it was sanctioned by the Central Intelligence Agency.
 
Lau says he doesn't know, nor does it matter to him. "You're talking to one of the footsoldiers here. I was out on the street all the time. My assumption is that what I was doing was legal. When the director of the FBI flies out to see you and personally shakes your hand for something you've done, then yeah, my assumption is that this was all approved."
 
Prior to becoming an FBI agent, Lau had been a CIA operative, spying on and occasionally recruiting Chinese students at the University of Michigan in the early 1980s. "A former Bureau guy who was working for the CIA spotted me," recalled Lau, who was a communications major and fluent in Mandarin and Cantonese. "They recruited me right on campus ... because I could speak the language."
 
In 1984, he was hired as an FBI "asset", working as a paid informant and operative in foreign-counterintelligence investigations. Within months, he scored a major coup. "In July 1984, I was highly commended by my FBI and CIA handlers for having recruited a valuable asset for the US intelligence community," Lau wrote in a now-classified portion of his court declaration. A year later he cracked another big case, one that reportedly involved the exposure of a Chinese double agent. Believing he had more than proved his worth to the FBI, Lau requested admission to the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia. The Bureau demurred. But when Lau threatened to quit and take a job with the Seattle Police Department, a spot was quickly found in the May 1986 training class, and Lau entered the FBI Academy to begin the process of becoming a full-fledged FBI agent.
 
At the time Lau was recruited, the Bureau was reeling over the discovery of several Chinese moles within its walls. "There had been a number of cases, and the feeling inside the FBI was that if they were going to do this to us, then we were going to do something back to them, like put someone inside their intelligence service," said a former law-enforcement official familiar with Lau's work.
 
All Lau would say on that score was that he "was supposed to avenge the failings of the intelligence community".
 
John Vasquez, the FBI's chief of training and research at the time Lau attended the academy, knew Lau as a student and said in a court filing that he was stunned to discover that the Bureau - halfway through Lau's training - had already assigned him to work on an undercover foreign-counterintelligence operation, something that struck the longtime FBI man as extraordinary. Rookie FBI agents typically wait years before they are deemed ready for undercover work. "The placement of an agent [into an undercover operation] right out of the academy is very unusual," Vasquez said. "Mr Lau had never seen a case file, worked a case, arrested anyone ... No one had ever taken an undercover assignment right out of the academy as Mr Lau did, before he was even an agent." Vasquez, who followed Lau's career, concluded that Lau "was probably recruited by the FBI for a specific operation".
 
After graduation, Lau was assigned to the Chicago FBI office, which houses one of the Bureau's most active foreign-counterintelligence centers, and he began working espionage cases undercover. He asked his bosses to tell him how much danger he was in. "'Will I get my tail shot off or will I get, you know, killed?' I asked [about] all the dangerous scenarios. Do you know what the answer was, ladies and gentlemen?" Lau asked an FBI security committee in 2000. "Nobody knew, because nobody had ever done it before ... I was told that I was the second FBI agent in history then, back in 1986, to attempt this project."
 
In five years, he saw the inside of the FBI's office once. He was living another life, that of a Chinese businessman and an associate of Chinese organized-crime figures. He was so far undercover that other FBI agents placed him under surveillance.
 
"Then they'd get all pissed off because nobody had bothered to tell them and they wasted all this manpower doing surveillance of me," Lau recalled. "Most of the time the right hand didn't know what the left hand was doing."
 
"Mr Lau was in deep cover. Mr Lau did not go home at night. He did not see his family," former FBI training official Vasquez said. "Mr Lau's credentials and badge were in the vault in the field office. He did not get a chance to see or hold his badge. When I visited him, he would ask to see and hold my badge."
 
According to the statements the Justice Department struck from the public record as secret - which seems to confirm their veracity - Lau twice went overseas, once in November 1987 and again in September 1989, as an undercover FBI agent. Prior to his first trip overseas, he was betrayed by a high-level FBI asset. The country he revisited in the fall of 1989 was then in turmoil, which accurately describes China at the time. Also stated was the fact that he had briefed CIA agents on his area of expertise, which happens to be China.
 
"I don't think there's much mystery left as to which country Lau was working in," newspaper lawyer Francke said jokingly. "It doesn't sound like he was in Denmark."
 
"During November of 1987, the historic trip turned out to be very stressful, with subjects giving me enhanced scrutiny during the visit, personnel armed with machine-guns were a constant reminder to me of my fate if something went wrong," Lau wrote in one section that was deemed classified. Because Lau was in China posing as a businessman instead of a diplomat, which is the typical cover used by CIA agents, he had no diplomatic immunity to spying charges. If caught, he would have been imprisoned or executed, not merely deported.
 
The month-long trip was a success, Lau said in another classified section, "and my accomplishments had exceeded all expectations. The skeptics made me undergo an extensive polygraph test to ascertain my loyalty and accomplishments."
 
According to the Justice Department, those bits of information are state secrets because they have been "deemed to describe intelligence methods and activities that are used in the FBI's present intelligence, counterintelligence and count-terrorism investigations". They are such important secrets that even the lawyer defending the FBI against Lau's lawsuit, assistant US attorney Kristin Horn, isn't allowed to know them. "I don't have a security clearance high enough," she explained.
 
Declassified FBI documents suggest that by 1991, Lau was deep inside the Chinese diplomatic community. In his performance review for that year, Lau's supervisor wrote: "SA LAU continues working in an undercover capacity in a complex, sensitive investigation of a major criteria country diplomatic establishment. He has succeeded in becoming a trusted confidant of numerous subjects of investigation and has also penetrated the 'inner circle' of the subject community. As a result, he obtains singular and sensitive information ..."
 
Lau's undercover mission was so productive, court records show, that then-FBI director William Sessions flew to Chicago in January 1988 to commend Lau personally and award him a bonus check for his work. One of his supervisors, former top FBI official Michael Waguespack - whose forte was Soviet intelligence and Chinese industrial espionage - described Lau's work in a 1992 report as an "exceptional performance".
 
Asked why he thinks the FBI wants to keep his highly lauded achievements secret after so many years, Lau replied that in the world of counterintelligence, there is often no such thing as "too" long ago. "Counterintelligence work takes time to produce results. It is like wine sometimes. The longer it ages," he said, "the more valuable it becomes." Sometimes, Lau suggested, double agents recruited at a young age eventually end up as influential policymakers or military officials.
 
There may be other reasons for the Bureau's squeamishness about Lau's career becoming public: it is likely he was committing crimes as part of his undercover role, crimes the FBI would have authorized Lau to commit.
 
"From a reading of the record, it is not difficult to discern that Lau was involved in espionage activities, kidnappings, trading in human slavery, illegal immigration, murder, torture, extortion, hostage-taking and any number of other criminal activities that involved crimes against humanity," claims a partially classified brief filed in support of Lau by the League of United Latin American Citizens. "Lau penetrated the Chinese Triads, the Tong, and other Chinese Organized Crime Organizations that trade in all of these things as a way of life ... For six years Lau had to be on his guard and had to participate in whatever these hostile forces demanded of him."
 
Lau would neither confirm nor deny that. "I'm not going to discuss that issue without immunity," he said flatly. But he asked if it made sense to imagine that an FBI undercover agent could gain the trust of a hostile foreign power by "just walking into some country and saying, 'Hi, I'm Lok Lau and I'd like to be your friend.' It doesn't work like that."
 
Lau's lawsuit against the FBI claims that his undercover assignment left him emotionally scarred and suffering from stress-induced disorders, but the FBI rebuffed his requests for counseling, saying there were no therapists with security clearances high enough to hear those kinds of woes. Lau asked the Bureau to find someone, and he was assured something would be done.
 
"The FBI failed to ... grant anyone the authorization to listen to classified information presented by Mr Lau," the FBI's Access Review Committee, which decides matters regarding security clearances, declared in a blistering 2000 decision. "The [committee] cannot endorse the actions of the FBI."
 
Lau's frustrations finally boiled over in a Sears store in Ann Arbor, Michigan, on Christmas Eve in 1990. Pocketing some paintbrushes, Lau tried to leave without paying for them. He was stopped and charged with shoplifting, to which he pleaded guilty. The FBI did an internal investigation and concluded that the stress of Lau's double life "contributed to your uncharacteristic display of impetuous poor judgment" and was a misdeed the Bureau could live with, given "the difficult and challenging circumstances you encountered during the first five years of your career". Lau immediately went back undercover; years later he served a two-week suspension. No one, apparently, thought an FBI agent caught shoplifting might need psychiatric help; in any event, none was offered.
 
A few months later, the undercover operation ended and, after six years in deep cover, Lau finally came in from the cold. He was through with undercover work, and he asked to be transferred to the Seattle office as a field agent so he could be close to his family, none of whom were allowed to know where he was or what he'd been doing since the mid-1980s.
 
His superiors in the Chicago FBI office, citing his undercover performance, strongly backed Lau's request, but FBI headquarters inexplicably rejected their recommendation. "I feel very strongly that as an institution the FBI mishandled SA Lau's transfer," former Chicago FBI official Waguespack complained in 1992. At the time, Waguespack was director of counterintelligence for the National Security Council.
 
Instead, the FBI granted Lau his fourth and final preference: the Sacramento office, where the resident agent, Deborah Pierce, soon began "building a book" on her slightly eccentric new hire, who had never worked in an FBI office before. His employment files for those years show he was assigned mostly mundane chores and every bureaucratic misstep and social faux pas he committed was duly noted and filed away:
 
"He laughs and tells stories to fit in when he joins a group, but his stories don't always fit the circumstances and he laughs at inappropriate places."
 
"He appeared to be trying to gain favor from his peers by being funny."
 
"Lau gave one of the steno clerks a T-shirt for doing his typing ... Lau's behavior resulted in this individual feeling uncomfortable."
 
In 1995, Lau asked for a transfer to the night shift because it paid more and because he had been having trouble sleeping. When his supervisor, Pierce, spoke to him about it, he "informed me that he liked to do the midnight shift for other people because then they would like him", she noted in a report. Those statements were later used against Lau in a fitness report - evidence, according to Pierce, that he was "overly concerned about money" and trying to "curry favor" with his co-workers. Those aberrations led Piece to conclude that Special Agent Lok Lau was "vulnerable to approach from a foreign government" and she told her superiors she considered Lau "a potential security risk" because of his poor attitude and his dislike of his current job.
 
For Lau, a naturalized citizen, it was his official death sentence as an FBI counterintelligence agent, and the Bureau's unkindest cut. "I risked my life for this country, for this agency, for six years. I had a top-secret security clearance," Lau complained. "I had a higher security clearance than she did."
 
"We needed a record to show poor performance and now have a year's worth," Pierce gloated in a handwritten 1995 memo to another FBI supervisor. "Now we have to start on the poor performance for investigations, which may take another year or more. Maybe we can get HIM to make the move out." Soon, the FBI took away Lau's gun, allegedly for medical reasons, revoked his Top Secret clearance, and confined him to working during daylight hours. Meanwhile, his supervisors chided him for his "delusions of persecution by management".
 
Assigned to copy files for other agents and run background checks on FBI job seekers, Lau began a mental meltdown and once again sought psychiatric care. Once again, the FBI declined.
 
"The FBI clearly failed in its obligations to provide Mr Lau with psychological treatment and organizational support," the FBI's Access Review Committee concluded. "The ARC unanimously agrees ... that Mr Lau did not receive appropriate support or psychological treatment." But it upheld the decision to lift Lau's security clearance anyway.
 
During the 1996 holiday season, Lau went into a Raley's supermarket in Sacramento and pilfered some toothpaste and a Master Lock. He was caught by a security guard, wrestled to the ground, handcuffed and hustled into a back room, where he pleaded with the guard to let him go, saying he was an FBI agent and would lose his job if he was prosecuted. The store pressed charges anyway, but the District Attorney's Office dropped them "in the interests of justice". Lau never told the FBI about it. And that was all it took for the FBI - which discovered the shoplifting incident several years later - to kick him out the door. Since then he has been fighting, unsuccessfully, to get his job back.
 
Assistant US attorney Horn, who succeeded in getting his discrimination suit dismissed a few days ago, called Lau's claims "ludicrous" and said the FBI had perfectly good reason to fire an agent who steals and lies. His years of undercover work, she said, "are irrelevant to this case". To help ensure that, Horn got Lau's expert witnesses - psychiatrists who diagnosed him as suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and major depression - barred for failure to meet a filing deadline. "He can't introduce anything pertaining to stress, or his undercover work. He doesn't have much of a case left," Horn said in an interview shortly before the suit was dismissed.
 
Former FBI official Vasquez believes the travails of Lok Lau are a tragedy. "The FBI used Mr Lau and then, when it was over, discarded him," Vasquez stated.
 
"Everyone is disposable," Lau said matter-of-factly. "No matter what."
 
Copyright 2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.
 
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/EK07Ad03.html
 

Disclaimer

 


MainPage
http://www.rense.com

This Site Served by TheHostPros