Rense.com



US Eases Up On Attorneys
For 'Enemy Combatants'

12-5-3


The United States has given two inmates at its controversial Guantanamo detention centre the right to a lawyer, suggesting a softening of its hard line in its war on terror.
 
"The administration is clearly responding to overwhelming criticism, both within and outside the United States, over its policies," particularly failing to allow legal representation to detainees at the US naval base in Guantanamo, Cuba, said Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor.
 
And "the response is rather belated and modest given the level and scope of the criticism," Turley stressed, arguing the US government has not had a coherent policy.
 
The Pentagon or the first time on Wednesday announced that a detainee at Guantanamo, Australian David Hicks, would get a military attorney. Others could follow, experts say.
 
In Sydney Thursday, the civilian lawyer for Hicks said he hopes to begin negotiating a plea bargain to get his client out of a Guantanamo as early as next week. The Australian lawyer, Stephen Kenny, said he would leave for the Guantanamo Bay base in Cuba next week.
 
Hicks, who was captured fighting with the Taliban in Afghanistan in late 2001, has not yet been charged with any crime.
 
The appointment of a military lawyer to represent him however indicates that a move to put him on trial could be imminent.
 
Also Wednesday the Pentagon authorized a US citizen of Saudi descent who was held in Guantanamo and then transferred to a military prison in the United States once his nationality was confirmed, to have legal representation.
 
The measure concerning Yaser Esam Hamdi, captured in Afghanistan in late 2001, should not be considered precedent-setting, the Defense Department says, noting it was a discretionary move.
 
"The administration has not said that either of these men are entitled to a lawyer, rather they've said that they are going to give them lawyers, as a discretionary matter, like they're deciding to do them a favor," Turley said.
 
"The administration is realizing that its legal position is far too extreme to be sustained on appeal," he added.
 
Michael Ratner, an attorney hired by relatives of several Guantanamo detainees and president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, said the government's shift on the Hami case comes amid its concerns that the Supreme Court will weight in on the issue.
 
A number of recent court decisions have run counter to the administration's anti-terror policies, increasingly seen in some quarters as running roughshod over individual liberties.
 
A federal appeals court in San Francisco on Wednesday ruled a 1996 antiterror law was unconstitutional. It allows those convicted of helping to finance or train a terrorist group to be sentenced to life imprisonment.
 
And two architects of the "Patriot Act" approved after the September 11 strikes on US targets, Viet Dinh and Michael Chertoff, recently left the Justice Department publicly criticizing what they see as its weaknesses.
 
More than 660 people from about 40 countries are being held at Guantanamo. The United States does not consider them prisoners of war and has held them indefinitely without setting trial dates.
 
Meanwhile, the New York-based rights watchdog group Amnesty International urged Washington not to repatriate to China more than 12 ethnic Uighur prisoners believe to be held in Guantanamo.
 
The men were reportedly training in Afghanistan with Uighur groups seeking independence or greater autonomy from China in the Xinjiang region.
 
Any Uighurs suspected of "separatist or terrorist" activities in China could be at risk of serious human rights violations, Amnesty said.
 
Amnesty does not, however, suggest where the Uighur detainees should be sent.
 
 
 
Copyright © 2002 AFP. All rights reserved. All information displayed in this section (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the contents of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presses.
 

Disclaimer

 


MainPage
http://www.rense.com

This Site Served by TheHostPros