Rense.com



Advanced Meat Recovery
Machine Under Scrutiny

By Julie Davidow
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Reporter
12-28-03



Note - Years ago, when this 'technology' was first announced and put on the market to 'solve'
the mad cow 'spinal cord problem' during slaughter, I warned vigorously that it could not be
expected to operate 'safely' in terms of removing ALL spinal cord tissue. It is long past time
for this equipment and process to come under suspicion. -ed
 
A slaughterhouse machine that blasts the last bits of flesh off cattle carcasses already relieved of their more recognizable cuts of beef is coming under increased scrutiny as the discovery of mad cow disease in Washington raises questions about the safety of the nation's food supply.
 
The machinery, known as Advanced Meat Recovery, sometimes also strips off spinal cord tissue, which can slip into the food supply unknown to the consumer.
 
A cow's central nervous system, including the brain and spinal cord, are the most likely to contain the misshapen proteins that most scientists believe cause mad cow disease.
 
Those pulpy pieces of tissue fill out any number of processed foods, including hamburgers, hot dogs, sausage and pizza toppings. They're also reduced down to add flavoring to beef bouillon and stock.
 
Consumer groups have been warning about the potential dangers looming in some of America's favorite foods since the outbreak of mad cow disease in England and Europe, where AMR has since been banned, said Caroline Smith DeWaal, food safety director for the Center for Science in the Public Interest.
 
"We warned the government many times that this is a gaping hole in the system," said Smith DeWaal. "Since 1997 they said you don't need to worry about this because we don't have mad cow disease here."
 
Now the discovery of a Holstein cow with the brain-wasting disease in Washington may force government regulators to take a closer look at the system.
 
"The future of AMR is very much in doubt and I would be very surprised if the industry and the government didn't move very rapidly to prohibit (this machinery)," said Steve Kay, publisher of Cattle Buyers Weekly, a newsletter about the beef industry published in Petaluma, Calif.
 
Before the carcass is put through the mechanical system, the spinal cord is removed and another machine sucks the remaining cord and fluid out of the cavity, according to Rosemary Mucklow, executive director of the National Meat Association.
 
"The spinal cord is removed on the kill floor," said Mucklow. "It might retain a little nerve ending tissue. But this industry removes that spinal cord very thoroughly."
 
Still, a 2002 U.S. Food and Drug Administration survey found that 33 percent of the meat products sampled from AMR production had traces of spinal cord tissue.
 
In 1994, the USDA changed its definition of meat to include mechanically extracted products.
 
Last year, the agency stepped up efforts to monitor spinal tissue remnants, announcing the beginning of routine sampling of AMR meat products.
 
If spinal tissue is detected, the slaughterhouse's machinery is flagged and the meat goes out with a special label reading, "mechanically separated beef," and still can be sold to consumers. The label, however, does not say the spinal cord tissue could be part of the package, according to Smith DeWaal.
 
The USDA also requests a voluntary recall for meat that's already gone out with spinal tissue.
 
But consumer groups say that's not enough.
 
Test results are only reported if they result in a voluntary recall, said Smith DeWaal.
 
And without consumer labeling that clearly marks the products as containing spinal tissue, meat eaters can't make informed choices about which beef parts to avoid.
 
"As we talked to the USDA about this, they told us this is a quality issue, it's not a safety issue," said Smith DeWaal.
 
There's no need to stop mechanically stripping cattle carcasses, said Dean Cliver, professor of population health at the University of California, Davis, who has served on a BSE advisory committee for the Agriculture Department.
 
The process helps keep the price of meat down and can be done safely, he said.
 
"The technology to not have spinal cord tissue (present in meat) is available," said Cliver.
 
"The technology to test for residue is available. How rigorously that's enforced is another matter."
 
©1996-2003 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/154256_consumer27.html
Disclaimer





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros