- Word has just come that Judge Blais, a one-time CSIS
boss, refuses to recuse himself, insisting that during his tenure, he had
no knowledge of the Zundel Case. Why, then, is Ernst described as so "dangerous"
for Canada, meriting the label "terrorist"?
-
- So many people ask, often in utter disbelief: Why on
earth would Ernst's enemies make such a monumental error, kidnapping him
on the flimsiest pretext and locking him up as though he were the worst
of criminals, when they KNOW they have no evidence against him whatsoever?
-
- Indeed.
-
- There are many answers to that question, at this point
all of them just theory, but bit by bit becoming solid evidence. I have
my own theory, not shared by everyone. I think it was part chutzpah, part
stupidity, part bluff. Haven't our enemies "boomeranged" themselves
before because they acted hastily and on mere impulse?
-
- My theory is that they thought that they could get away
with it. For one, the INS was merging into a huge bureaucracy, Homeland
Security, and there was a lot of confusion. Furthermore, whoever had his
dirty fingers in this pie counted on a speedy deportation - and not to
Canada; to Germany! Thirdly, these people acted on false data. They thought
that Ernst had left Canada for the US in March 2000 for the last time -
not so! And, finally, they left some nifty traces they didn't think we
would find out. We are still connecting the dots.
-
- Here is a brief but poignant reader summary of just how
stupidly, with utter disregard for law or even common sense, this kidnapping
was carried out - and now our enemies are stuck with it because what they
did, and how it was done, makes ever more people perk up about what's really
going on. This summary is very useful for our files:
-
- [START]
-
- This is so hard to accept as reality! How can a national
government be so insecure as to indulge itself in the actual persecution
of a pacifist for ! the crime of - what? What is the crime? Racism? I thought
the Jews weren't a race.
-
- Who will benefit if Ernst Zundel is deported to Germany?
That is, is this really a German operation, or a Canadian operation, or
an American operation? Which country is making this persecution happen?
Does Germany really want Ernst Zundel showing up there at this fragile
time of explosive Holocaust awareness?
-
- Or is the alleged crime the blowing of an immigration
meeting in a foreign country? Because a non-Canadian allegedly misses a
meeting regarding his attempt at citizenship in America he is jerked back
to Canada so that he can be deported to Germany, where he can be punished
for defaming the dead? In America, of course, "defamation of the dead"
carries no civil or criminal penalty. There is no such crime or charge
here. Perhaps Canada is different.
-
- But now the charge by the Crown is "terrorism."
Since there is no evidence that he has actually terrorized anyone, the
question must be asked, "Who is terrified of Ernst Zundel?"
-
- Black's Law Dictionary defines "terror" as
"Alarm; fright; dread; the state of mind induced by the apprehension
of hurt from some hostile or threatening event or manifestation; fear caused
by the appearance of danger." Black's says that "A person is
guilty of a felony if he threatens to commit any crime of violence with
purpose to terrorize another... or in reckless disregard of the risk of
causing such terror or inconvenience." How does this apply to Ernst
Zundel?
-
- It applies because the use of terror was not by Zundel
but rather against him. The persecution of Zundel is meant to terrorize
the general population of Canada into silence and submission to Jewish
rule. "This could happen to you."
-
- A crime of violence has been committed against Ernst
Zundel by the American police. He was falsely and maliciously and violently
arrested by th! e use and/or threatened use of firearms. [Here I want to
put in a caveat: At least some of the five government officials who came
to arrest/kidnap Ernst were visibly armed. At least one of them was wearing
a bullet-proof vest as if he expected a shootout. However, there was no
display of arms, or implication that those arms would be used. There was
no need for that because Ernst offered no resistance, and I was too stunned
to even think of resistance - I only asked to be allowed to call our attorney,
a request that was brusquely and, I believe, illegally denied.] Other violent
means were used by the American police to kidnap Zundel and take him to
multiple places of imprisonment, across state lines, where he was falsely
imprisoned.
-
- "False imprisonment" is defined by Black's
as "The unlawful arrest or detention of a person without warrant,
or by an illegal warrant, or a warrant illegally executed... consists in
the unlawful detentionin the person of another, for any length of time,
whereby he is deprived of his personal liberty."
-
- But here is how Black's Law Dictionary views what happened
to Ernst Zundel:
-
- "Kidnapping. At common law, the forcible abduction
or stealing and carrying away of a person from own country to another.
The unlawful seizure and removal of a person from own country or state
against his will. In American law, the intent to send the victim out of
the country does not constitute a necessary part of the offense; the unlawful
taking and carrying away of a human being by force and against his will
being the essential elements. At common law kidnapping was a misdemeanor,
but under modern statutes such a crime is a felony.
-
- "A person is guilty of kidnapping if he unlawfully
removes another from his place of residence or business, or a substantial
distance from the vicinity where he is found, or if he unlawfully confines
another for a substant! ial period in a place of isolation, with any of
the following purposes: (a) to hold for ransom or reward, or as a shield
or hostage; or (b) to facilitate commission of any felony or flight thereafter;
or (c) to inflict bodily injury on or to terrorize the victim or another;
or (d) to interfere with the performance of any governmental or political
function."
-
- Legal experts and normal people can easily see how Ernst
Zundel might proceed against his [...] perpetrators once he is exonerated
of any malicious charge in the Canadian system.
|
