- WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Bush
administration officials "systematically" misrepresented the
danger of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs, which were not an
immediate threat to the United States and the Middle East, a report from
a U.S. think tank said on Wednesday.
-
- The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said in
its study, "WMD IN IRAQ: Evidence and Implications," that there
was "no convincing evidence" Iraq had reconstituted its nuclear
program and that U.N. weapons inspectors had discovered that nerve agents
in Iraq's chemical weapons program had lost most of their lethal capability
as early as 1991.
-
- There was greater uncertainty about Iraq's biological
weapons, but that threat was related to what could be developed in the
future rather than what Iraq already had, the study by the liberal-leaning
think tank said.
-
- The missile program appeared to have been in active development
in 2002 and Iraq was expanding its capability to build missiles with ranges
that exceeded U.N. limits, it said.
-
- The United States justified going to war against Iraq
last year citing a threat from Baghdad's weapons of mass destruction.
-
- Since the U.S. occupation of Iraq, American forces hunting
for weapons of mass destruction have not found any stockpiles of biological
or chemical weapons or any solid evidence Iraq had resurrected its nuclear
weapons program.
-
- It was unlikely Iraq could have destroyed, hidden, or
moved out of the country hundreds of tons of chemical and biological weapons,
dozens of SCUD missiles, and facilities producing chemical and biological
weapons without the United States detecting some sign of that activity,
the report said.
-
- "Administration officials systematically misrepresented
the threat from Iraq's WMD and ballistic missile programs," the report
said.
-
- They lumped nuclear, chemical and biological weapons
together as a single threat, despite the "very different" danger
they posed, which distorted the cost/benefit analysis of the war, the study
said.
-
- Administration officials also insisted without evidence
that former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein would give weapons of mass destruction
to terrorists, the report said.
-
- "There was no evidence to support the claim that
Iraq would have transferred WMD to al Qaeda and much evidence to counter
it," the report said. There was also no solid evidence of a cooperative
relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda, it said.
-
- 'UNDULY INFLUENCED'
-
- Prior to 2002, intelligence agencies appeared to have
overestimated the chemical and biological weapons in Iraq but had a generally
accurate reading of the nuclear and missile programs, the study said.
-
- But from 2002 until the war in Iraq, there appeared to
have been an environment of intense political pressure in which an October
2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq's banned weapons was hurriedly
put together and included a high number of dissents in what was supposed
to be a consensus document of the various intelligence agencies, the study
said. The Pentagon created a separate intelligence office during that time.
-
- Those factors suggested "the intelligence community
began to be unduly influenced by policymakers' views," the study said.
-
- Stuart Cohen, vice chairman of the National Intelligence
Council, which produced the National Intelligence Estimate, told ABC's
"Nightline" on Tuesday, "Assertions, particularly that we
had shaded our judgments to support an administration policy, were just
nonsense."
-
- Copyright © 2004 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.
Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited
without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable
for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance
thereon.
-
- http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=574&e=8&u=
/nm/20040108/wl_nm/iraq_usa_weapons_dc
|
