Rense.com

 
China Doesn't Get It:
Taiwan Won't Be Bullied

By Jonathan Manthorpe
Vancouver Sun
1-25-4
 
China paraded seven alleged Taiwanese spies before reporters a few days ago in what appears to be a new tactic to influence March 20 presidential elections in the island state of 23 million people.
 
Past attempts by China to upset the democratic process in Taiwan, which Beijing claims to own, have failed miserably and this latest ploy doesn't look like a winner either.
 
China fired unarmed missiles into the shipping lanes around Taiwan in 1996 when the island held its first free presidential elections after a 10-year transition to democracy from a one-party military regime.
 
Beijing's aim was to scare Taiwan's voters away from supporting Lee Teng-hui, whom China believed was intent on securing internationally recognized independence for the island.
 
But the threats didn't work. Taiwanese are a tough, resourceful and resilient people. They flocked to vote for president Lee.
 
In the last elections in 2000, Beijing wheeled out its usually moderate prime minister Zhu Rongji to issue blood-curdling threats of invasion if the island didn't soon start bowing to China's demands for control of the island.
 
That didn't work either. Instead Beijing was presented with the discomforting picture of the first peaceful and democratic transfer of political power in any predominantly ethnic Chinese society. The leader of the opposition Democratic Progressive Party, Chen Shui-bian, was elected president.
 
Now Chen, whose party is in favour of formal independence, is up for re-election in a tight race and Beijing has turned to the substantial community of several hundred thousand Taiwanese business people working on the mainland to try to exert pressure.
 
The seven Taiwanese produced last weekend were part of a group of more than 40 nabbed by China's state security agents.
 
Why these seven were produced and not the rest can only be guessed at. But it is hard to escape the notion that the seven had been successfully pressured into telling reporters the things Beijing wanted said while the remaining "spies" had not.
 
"Chen Shui-bian is really rotten," said one of the seven, Fu Hung-chang. "After using us, he abandons us. I'm really hurt."
 
Beijing appears to be hoping that if Taiwanese voters fear for the safety of their business people on the mainland, who have been the largest single investors in China's economic development in recent years, they will turn away from president Chen. Beijing would much prefer to see the more cautious Lien Chan, presidential candidate for the Kuomintang party, head the island's administration.
 
Another possibility, of course, is an exodus of Taiwanese investors from the mainland and a reaffirmation among the island's people that they want nothing to do with China while it remains a lawless one-party dictatorship.
 
What the "spies" are alleged to have done is provide the Taiwan administration with information on the siting of the 496 missiles China has aimed at the island from 160 kilometres away across the Taiwan Strait.
 
This belligerent display by China and its persistent threats to invade the island have allowed President Chen to employ a new law providing a legal framework for referenda on the island.
 
When they vote in the presidential election Taiwanese will also be asked to cast their ballots on two questions.
 
One asks if they agree to the government strengthening the island's defences, including deployment of an anti-ballistic missiles shield, if China does not withdraw its missile threat and renounce the use of force against Taiwan.
 
The second question asks if the Taiwan government should negotiate with the mainland to establish a framework for peace and stability across the strait.
 
China is apoplectic about the referendum. The Beijing government doesn't like to see free expressions of public opinion to begin with, but on Taiwan it fears referenda will at some point be used to ask the islanders whether they want recognized independence.
 
Chen has already said that if re-elected he intends to use referenda to replace Taiwan's outdated and overly complex constitution with a modern version. There can be little doubt that while the constitutional rewrite may not directly address the independence question, it will further embed what is already a reality: that Taiwan is an independent nation and has been since it became a separate administration when the Communists took control of China in 1949.
 
It is not only China that is troubled by the possibilities contained in the referendum law. So is the United States administration of President George W. Bush.
 
Early in December, Bush expressed public irritation with his Taiwanese counterpart for disturbing the status quo in relations with China. Bush's comments had added punch because he made them with China's new prime minister, Wen Jiabao, standing at his side during a visit to Washington.
 
America is bound by domestic legislation, the Taiwan Relations Act, to aid the island's defence if it is attacked. Bush's military is already overstretched with its commitments in the Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan. It would be hard to cope with another troublespot.
 
But in the last few weeks, Washington has moderated its view, especially since the publication of the non-provocative referendum questions.
 
Beijing, however, is not mollified and officials continue to insist that any referendum on Taiwan brings the island and its people "to the brink of danger."
 
jmanthorpe@png.canwest.com © Copyright 2004 Vancouver Sun Copyright © 2004 CanWest Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. CanWest Interactive Inc. is an affiliate of CanWest Global Communications Corp. Copyright & Permission Rules
 
http://www.canada.com/vancouver/vancouversun/columnists
/story.asp?id=7018BAAB-889B-4BAE-A8FC-DA196AB4FE81
 
 
Disclaimer





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros