Rense.com




Mad Cow Has Home
On US Ranges
International Experts Say The Disease Is "Indigenous" To North America,
And It Will Take Drastic Measures To Stop Its Spread

By Jim Barnett
The Oregonian
2-7-4



RIVERDALE, Md. -- Mad cow disease probably has been established in North America for more than a decade, and Americans should be prepared for the discovery of more domestic cases as it spreads through herds.
 
A panel of international experts released these findings Wednesday to U.S. Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman, also urging the Department of Agriculture to toughen protections put into place following the Dec. 23 discovery of an infected Holstein in Washington state.
 
Those protections, while helpful, are not sufficient to keep mad cow disease from spreading further, or "amplifying," within the North American herd, the researchers concluded.
 
"We need more, much more," said Ulrich Kihm, a Swiss scientist who led the advisory panel. "If we don't accept and implement measures -- strong measures -- then we have this amplification cycle going on and on."
 
Will Hueston, a veterinarian at the University of Minnesota, estimated that more testing would uncover the presence of more mad cow disease: "I wouldn't be surprised by two or three more cases. I think in the worst-case scenario, from everything we know to date, we're talking a dozen or maybe two dozen (cases)."
 
The lone Washington case rocked the U.S. beef industry and to some degree the public's confidence in the safety of the beef supply. Dozens of foreign nations blocked the importation of U.S. beef as processors in Oregon and Washington scrambled to recall, in several states, more than a million pounds of processed meat, fats and proteins traced to the infected cow.
 
The panel released its findings to a restive group of regulators, scientists and meat-industry representatives Wednesday in Riverdale. Significantly, it called bovine spongiform encephalitis, or BSE, "indigenous" in the United States and Canada and built its proposals around halting transmission of the disease:
 
Test and dispose of all "downer" cattle more than 30 months old. Now, cattle unable to walk are barred from entering the food chain and may elude testing.
 
Test all cattle more than 30 months old that exhibit signs of mad cow disease, die before slaughter or are slaughtered under emergency circumstances.
 
Eliminate high-risk tissues, including brains and central nervous tissue of cattle 30 months or older, from animal feed and human food supplies.
 
Expand feed restrictions to bar all mammalian and poultry protein from cattle feed.
 
Implement a national animal identification system.
 
The panel's assertion that BSE was indigenous to North American herds was its most controversial. Although the Washington cow was born in Canada, the report warned: "The significance of this BSE (mad cow) case cannot be dismissed by considering it 'an imported case.' "
 
Kihm said he thought that infection of the North American herd had begun before the disease was diagnosed extensively in Britain and linked to human deaths but that it only recently had spread to detectable levels in Canada and the United States.
 
"We believe that the infection in North America took place at least 10 years ago," Kihm said. "You need one cycle before you have a few animals positive, and you don't see them in the first cycle. You need a second or a third."
 
The findings were presented to a USDA subcommittee appointed by Veneman. Some members expressed frustration.
 
"It's still possible most, if not all, here came from somewhere else," said Robert Eckroade, a researcher at the University of Pennsylvania. "Indigenous means we're going to have it for years, and I'm not ready to support that."
 
Tobin Armstrong, a rancher from Texas, said the panel's proposals would impose enormous costs on the cattle industry when the threat to human health appeared to be minimal.
 
"We're talking about going to draconian measures to measure something we don't fully understand," Armstrong said. "What are we trying to protect ourselves against?"
 
Kihm said that extra care is warranted precisely because scientists don't fully understand the disease or how it is transmitted. Therefore, they should not resist taking actions that they know can reduce risk of spread, he said.
 
"You have to realize that you can't measure the effect of all your measures implemented today," he said. "You have to wait five, six years."
 
Kihm also said he disagreed with a study from the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis concluding that existing precautions, such as the feed ban, had arrested the spread of mad cow and eventually would eradicate the disease.
 
"The disease will spread, spread all over the place" if no additional steps are taken, he said.
 
Veneman was briefed on the panel's findings but has not yet decided whether to act on them, said Julie Quick, a spokeswoman.
 
In Washington state, meanwhile, legislators on Wednesday considered a half-dozen bills that would change how state agencies and farmers deal with sick or dead animals. A bill expanding the state's power to quarantine animals suspected of diseases passed the Senate Tuesday and is being considered by the House.
 
Other bills, awaiting committee approval, would give the state power to require animal identification programs; create a board to address disposal of dead cattle; suspend the business tax on beef wholesalers until Japan, Mexico and Korea lift their bans on U.S. beef; and make it a misdemeanor to violate federal rules on animal feeds or to transport downer animals for nonmedical reasons.
 
Staff Writer Andy Dworkin contributed to this report. Jim Barnett: 503-294-7604; jim.barnett@newhouse.com
 
©2004 OregonLive.com. All Rights Reserved.
 
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/
base/front_page/107598594853210.xml
\

Disclaimer





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros