Rense.com



Who's Wagging Whom?
A Discussion About Zionism
And Jews Part 2

1-19-4



From: Judy Moriarty
To: Shiu Hung@pacbell.net ; skylax@comcast.net Cc: (list) Sent:
Saturday, January 17, 2004 3:25 AM
Subject: Discussion of Kaminski on WBAI board
 
In a message dated 1/16/2004 9:11:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, shiuhung@pacbell.net writes:
 
Based on what i have read thus far with your work, especially the writings in your American Autopsy Report book, i thought i understood that you are not anti-jewish but rather anti-zionist as i assume most of us here knows the difference. ......I think it is crucial that we use our words carefully and failure to do so would only lead us to unnecessary attack by the "knee-jerks" of the Pacifica/left milieu. >>
 
I have voiced similar feelings to John. I wish he would distinguish between Jews and Zionists. Jeff Rense goes out of his way to state that there are many Jews who are appalled by the actions of Israel and the Zionist takeover. (and it is true)
 
These Jewish people, though perhaps too few in number, are trying, as best they can, to educate the populace.
 
One of the shows I listen to on WBAI is Taking Aim with Ralph Schoenman and Mya Shone........and I wept when I read The Hidden History of Zionism.
 
In deference to John...........It is difficult to stay true to yourself and to remain afloat in these sickening times. I can appreciate John's integrity but I know it is possible to reach a lot more people.
 
John is a man with a great deal to say and the courage to say it. Unfortunately, he is not being heard. (either by design or because much of the sheeple have been so brainwashed)
 
Peace, Judy
 
"Shiu M. Hung" wrote:
 
Thank you, Jude, for expressing 'fairness' and 'caution', "fairness" as in not paint a broad brush when we express our opposition towards Zionism because, as you had also indicated, not the entire Jewish population are Zionist; "fairness" as in the willingness to allow yourself to play fair on this issue, as I know there are just as many "knee-jerked' responses from anti-zionists people as there are coming from the traditional left/Pacifica Radio milieu. I, too, wish John Kaminski would try a bit harder to distinguish the differences because that is a sure way to do a disservice to the 9/11 movement, by painting broad brushes towards the Jewish community when we are talking about Zionist/Mossad connection to 9/11. While there will continue to be supporters for John's work because we agree with his analysis but there are those out there whom are not so patient and forgiving, and they are ready to attack at any minute anytime the 'Jewish" issue is raised.
 
Shiu
 
 
From John Kaminski
To Shiu M. Hung
Subject: Re: Discussion of Kaminski on WBAI board
 
I think the point you are missing is that 90 percent of Jews are Zionists, rabid and unquestioning supporters of the horrific, racist behavior of Israel. Especially note this: those Jews who object to grouping Jews and Zionists are most often Zionists at the same percentage of the Jewish population. The Neturei Kartas and Jews Against Zionism don't object to my terminology, but Zionists posing as unbiased human beings, many of whom are on the Pacifica board, definitely do, because I am trying to wreck their scam. I think you also fail to consider many Jews who might be critical of Israel are doing so out of some kind of political correctness, and when push comes to shove you will find they are lying about their stances.
 
Pacifica has become a Zionist news outlet, and that's the same as calling them Jewish, I'm sure you will agree.
 
 
From: stzzb To: (list) Subject: Discussion of Kaminski on WBAI board
 
COMMENT: I don't speak for Mr. Kaminski, but I'd like to add my 2 cents to this. I know what I'm talking about.
 
Sir, you say this:
 
COMMENT: John, I would like to agree just so we can shelf this discussion, but where is the documentation to show that 90% of Jews are Zionist?
 
RESPONSE: I posted earlier documentation that Jews overwhelmingly support the Jewish state. The issue is not necessarily if Jews are "Zionist," or not. That is NOT the sole criteria for Jewish support of Israel. Far from it. This issue is not merely the political platform of Zionism. It is trans-world Jewish allegiance to an ideology of victimization, and ideology of rage about this, and the notion that "Israel" (not necessarily "Zionism") is there to defend world Jewry from "anti-Semitism." Technical Zionist dogma you can toss in the garbage can. That's not the sustaining issue for most American Jews (although there are many who swallow this stuff).
 
If you go to this link:
 
http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=5351
 
you will find this article:
 
Results of Poll Sponsored by Israel Policy Forum, the Jewish Week, and the Wilstein Institute of Jewish Policy Studies Studies, Jewish Week, November 20, 2001
 
Here you'll find that a scientific poll (by Jewish organizations) of Jewish Americans found that "the most important issue or problem facing the [obviously extremely ethnocentric] Jewish community in the United States today" to be:
 
1) Anti-Semitism [23%] 2) Peace and Security for Israel 3) Terrorism [13%] 4) Intermarriage [i.e., marrying non-Jews - 12%] 5) U.S.-Israeli relations [8%].
 
Public education was 8th, poverty and hunger 9th, and the environment 10th [all with 1%].
 
And here's your 90% figure:
 
89% of respondents were "strongly favorable" or "somewhat favorable" to Israel. Bear in mind, another 5% of Jewish respondents ventured no opinion and another 1% didn't respond. And here's the crucial essence: Merely 3% were "somewhat unsupportive" and 2% "strong unsupportive" of Israel.
 
So this 89% figure is out of a possible 95% of the people who answered the poll. So the actual figure of Jewish American "support" for Israel may be considerably higher.
 
59% of Jewish respondents were even "strongly favorable" or "somewhat favorable" to Ariel Sharon. Think about that. That's close to 2 out of 3.
 
Again, the issue isn't necessarily "Zionism." The issue is "Jews." Jews can pour money at the JEWISH state and parade in the streets for it and not care a whit for explicitly Zionist dogma.
 
YOUR COMMENT: By the way, just to let you know that my position on this issue is not passive, i literally walked away from a $12,000 bathroom remodeling job a few years ago when i ended up debating with a Zionist, and i just couldn't stand her position concerning the occupation, and i really needed the work.
 
RESPONSE: Kudos to you. If more people acted that way, there could be a noticeable impact.
 
YOUR COMMENT": I do know that there are factions amoungst the anti-Zionist movement within the Jewish community, vis-a-vis "one-State" verses "two-State" solution but i can readily agree with you that those of Jewish descent do so because of "PC". According to your analysis, would it be too much of a stretch to say most "White" Americans are bigots, vis-a-vis the Ku Klux Klan tendencies? I doubt it, so i will also doubt what you are inferring about "most Jewish are Zionist". Shiu
 
RESPONSE: You are comparing apples and oranges. The numbers of Americans who "somewhat support" or "strongly support" the KKK is nil. You know that. And the KKK is toxified and ostracized EVERYWHERE in mainstream American culture. Conversely, Zionism (or, more correctly, Jewish alliegiance to racist Israel) is a backbone of modern America, from the government to the media, from mass culture on out.
 
Please think about this. And its implications to us all.
 
And please consider what your form of self-censorship about the explicitly "Jewish" dimension of "Zionism" does in protecting Jewish/Israeli brutality and racism from public discourse.
 
It's ingenious. A moral guy like you shuts up when he reaches the "J" word, which is what Israel is ENTIRELY about.
 
 
From: Shiu M. Hung Subject: Discussion of Kaminski on WBAI board Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004
 
Thank you so very much for sharing your knowledge on this subject. I will look into the information you shared.
 
I hope you understand that I am coming from a "clean space" on this issue and I share the same degree of frustration as you and John concerning the US Left's reaction to sensitive issue such as this. By the way, I am the keeper of the leftgatekeepers.com website so please keep it in mind if you wish to submit articles concerning issue of 9/11 left media censorship, and I suppose at this point the Zionist connection to 9/11 needs to be exposed as well. Other than Ralph Shoenman and Mya Shoan of Taking Aims, I don't think the Zionist angle has much exposure.
 
I stand corrected.
 
I just wish there was a 'saner' way of communicating our ideas and thoughts to others on the left about this issue without having to resort to 'self-censorship' or 'self doubt'.
 
Shiu

 

Disclaimer





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros