- Good Morning from the Zundelsite:
-
- Some of the Zgram below is "legalese", but
I wanted it preserved for the record. Up-front, look at the Zundelsite
stats:
-
- In less than two months (from December 8th to today),
the Zundelsite count is as follows:
-
- Total Hits: 984,269
-
- Average Hits Per Day 17,267 Average Hits Per Hour 738
Average Hits Per Visitor 8.3
-
- In other words, we are very close to having achieved
the "6 million hits" we were aiming for some time ago.
-
- Very popular still are the Harwood booklet pages, "Did
Six Million Really Die?" and the amazing Leuchter Report!
-
- And, by the way, speaking of the Leuchter Report: The
documentary that was based on that report by Fred Leuchter, titled "Mr.
Death" was playing on Swedish television a few days ago, to great
interest and many comments on how forceful and believable Mr. Zundel came
across!
-
- So you can see that interest in Holocaust Revisionism
is alive and well, despite all the gloomy predictions! If the Zundelsite
is doing that well, despite the fact that I have had very little time for
close to four years to update the website other than to keep the trial
information current and my Zgrams going, imagine what the other revisionist
websites such as www.vho.org and www.ihr.org are doing! At the present
time, they are much more current than the Zundelsite.
-
- =====
-
- Paul Fromm reports on the session of the Canadian Federal
Court of Appeal that took place on January 28, 2004:
-
- Justices: Messrs. Sexton, Struger, Evans;
-
- For the Government: Mr. MacIntosh, (Lead), plus three
other persons in lawyerly robes;
-
- For the Apellant: Mr. Peter Lindsay and his partner,
Chi-Kun Shi;
-
- Audience: About a dozen people for each side, no representatives
of the Press;
-
- Mr. MacIntosh spoke for about half an hour on his motion
to quash the appeal on the question whether the issuance of a National
Security Certificate under the Immigration Law is reasonable or not.
He interpreted requirements for the judicial review of the reasonableness
of the Certificate and felt that this appeal does not meet those requirements.
-
- Lengthy interpretations of Sect. 74, 80.3 81 of the Federal
Immigration Act followed to support this contention. He stated that the
Right of an Appeal does not exist. If it were allowed, a "whole
raft" of other appeals would be launched as several issues, such as
the secrecy of the evidence and the witnesses etc. would be appealed.
-
- He felt that the Canadian Parliament fully intended the
restrictions of the right of appeal, quoting the example of the law that
a removal order cannot be appealed.
-
- He recommended that Mr. Zundel's detention be continued.
-
- Mr. Lindsay in his rebuttal stated that the Law does
not explicitly state that an appeal is not allowed; only the determination
cannot be appealed. Therefore, this Court should not take away, what the
Parliament has not taken away.
-
- His interpretation of Section 76 and 77 followed, and
he discussed the applicability of the principles of Natural Law and Fairness
to this case, which should be taken into consideration by the judges.
-
- He also pointed out that this is not a judicial review
of Justice Blais' work before whom another session is scheduled for Feb.
9, 2004.
-
- Mr. MacIntosh felt that the appeal was abusing the legal
system, to which Mr. Lindsay objected.
-
- Mr. Lindsay pointed out that a motion to expedite these
proceeding had been made by him on January 22, 2004. He also made a motion
for a stay of the proceedings as several other hearings and appeals are
in progress; as for instance the appeal to the Ontario Court of Appeals
under the Charter of Human Rights.
-
- Unless a stay is issued, contradictory or unworkable
decisions may result. Particularly, Zundel's constitutional challenge
of the issuance of the Security Certificate has not yet been dealt with,
which is scheduled for April 14, 2004.
-
- Therefore, a delayed decision in Mr. Zundel's favour
would be useless to him, as he could be sitting in a German jail by then.
-
- The Judges reserved their judgement on the motions made
and gave the Government and the appellants till Feb. 13, 2004 to make written
submissions. They will then inform the lawyers of their decision; i.e.
there will not be another public session of this Court.
-
- The above information is gathered under very annoying
circumstances, as the audience found it very hard to sometimes impossible,
to hear the arguments made. It could not be determined whether there was
a sound system. One member of the audience was told very quickly by the
Court Clerk to "sit down" , when he raised this issue.
-
- What does this all mean? Ernst told me that evening:
***"The abuses of the system are on trial. The way the system works
now, the government is shooting fish in a barrel. The judges are fully
alert to that fact! "***
-
- =====
-
- Finally, a rather telling press release was issued by
CAFE:
-
- FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
-
- CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION WEBSITE UNDER
MASSIVE ATTACK
-
- The Canadian Association for Free Expression website
is currently under a massive attack by hackers.
-
- "We are currently fighting a massive and obviosuly
well-organized distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) which is causing the
site to be unavailable for periods of time," says CAFE webmaster Marc
Lemire.
-
- "The attack started Friday and continues today (Sunday
Feb 1, 2004) using a SYN Flood technique to overwhelm the webserver,"
he explains.
-
- Why this criminal attack in cyberspace?
-
- "With CAFE being the number one voice for honest
reporting of the bogus Zundel 'security threat' hearing, is it too crazy
to ask if the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) or other government
agents are behind the attack?" asks Paul Fromm, Director of the Canadian
Association for Free Expression.
-
- According to Andrew Mitrovica's book COVERT ENTRY, CSIS
has been, at the very least, a passive accomplice to a 1995 mailbomb assassination
attempt aimed at Mr. Zundel. CSIS strictly instructed its mail snooping
operatives not to open any package from Vancouver addressed to Mr. Zundel
in May, 1995. That very month a powerful pipe bomb with a Vancouver return
address was delivered by mail to Mr. Zundel's Toronto residence.
-
- This charge against CSIS was raised in federal court
Tuesday and reported on this website Wednesday, says Paul Fromm. "Is
this "payback" for our questioning the activities of CSIS, Canada's
political police, who have strayed far from their mandate which exempts
peaceful dissent and protest from their scrutiny?" Fromm asks.
-
- CAFE will not be silenced by electronic terrorists and
we will continue to lobby for justice and a fair trial for political dissidents
like Ernst Zundel and Brad Love.
-
- "CAFE's website will soon be out in a new and expanded
form," Fromm announced today.
-
- -- NO SURRENDER --
|
