Rense.com




Sugar Wars
US Accused Of Making Health A 'Hostage To Fortune'

The Sunday Herald - UK
2-29-4



Obesity is a global crisis ... and at its heart is our love of sugary food. The World Health Organisation wants us to eat less, but big business wants us to eat more. Today the battle begins in earnest.
 
When William Steiger looked in the mirror at his Geneva hotel and pulled his tie into place, he knew that a battle lay ahead. Glancing through his private papers that morning ñ Tuesday, January 20 ñ the Yale graduate and assistant to US health secretary Tommy G Thompson made his final preparations for a meeting many considered to be one of the most important of our time.
 
In a few hours, inside a wood-panelled room in the Swiss capital's heart, 32 officials and diplomats would gather to consider a blueprint for combating obesity, one of the greatest health problems sweeping the globe.
 
But while the majority at the World Health Organisation (WHO) board was behind the plan, Steiger ñ backed by the powerful food and drinks lobby ñ was preparing to pull apart the best opportunity to date to avert a public health crisis that is threatening to bring the human race to its knees.
 
The focus of Steiger's attack was a report entitled the Global Strategy On Diet, Nutrition and Physical Activity ñ also known by its technical number, 916. For the first time the WHO had produced a global blueprint that examined how to prevent and control the major diet-related diseases, including diabetes, obesity, some cancers and cardiovascular and dental diseases.
 
The need for a global strategy was clear, said WHO's scientists. Already in the developed world the US and UK were suffering epidemics of obesity fuelled by sedentary lifestyles and processed foods, but now so too was the developing world.
 
The report ñ put together by 36 of the world's leading nutrition and activity experts ñ warned that poorer countries, even more than Western nations, were at risk from junk food because their populations carry more "thrifty genes", which predisposes people to putting on weight quickly after centuries of living through glut and famine. By 2025, it added, India would have one of the highest rates of Type II diabetes, which correlates with the rising incidence of obesity.
 
Among the raft of proposals contained in the report were plans for national guidelines on diet and physical activity, a ban on food marketing that exploits children, and a better food labelling system.
 
However, one part more than any other has transformed the report into a global battlefield ñ a clause that suggests only 10% of the average energy intake for an adult should come from added sugar. Currently, 13% of calories in the British diet come from added sugar, or around 70 grams each day per adult. In the US, where public health guidelines are more lax, added sugar can provide as much as 25% of the population's intake.
 
Under Steiger's pressure, the only real agreement reached at the January meeting was to give member states until today to submit further comments for revisions of the draft document. Then, in mid-March, the final draft strategy would be made available to members of the World Health Assembly and in May WHO's full 192-country membership would vote to adopt it.
 
However, with billions of pounds at stake for the food and drinks industry, one of the most intensive lobbying campaigns is being redoubled in an attempt to change the minds of member countries. Already details about the extent of the lobbying activities surrounding the report has been remarkable. Led by the sugar manufacturers groups, lobbyists have been hired and US senators used to threaten WHO funding.
 
In the US ñ where the majority of the population (more than two-thirds) are now overweight or obese ñ the financial interests in sugar are enormous. The industry has strong connections to the highest levels of the US government through its lobbying firms, which have aggressively targeted politicians and government officials. One of the strongest factors in its favour is that much of US sugar production is based in Florida, a state run by governor Jeb Bush, President George W Bush's brother.
 
Jose "Pepe" Fanjul, president of sugar giant Florida Crystals Corp, is close to George Bush and officials with access to the White House. He is one of Bush's top fundraisers. Other sugar firms have feted the Republicans. In 2000, J Nelson Fairbanks, chief executive of US Sugar Corp, became a "Pioneer", an honour for fundraisers who bring in at least $100,000 for Bush's campaign. Warren Stanley, chief executive of Cargill, a sugar trader, is a Pioneer this year.
 
The International Sugar Organisation (ISO) has also been vigorously lobbying sugar-exporting countries such as Mauritius, Brazil and French Guyana. They in turn have expressed reservations about the WHO strategy, fearing that a curb on consumption would mean a decline in their sugar exports. Earlier this month an ISO memo revealed that it believed the WHO report was "scientifically deficient and cannot be a basis for a global strategy on diet and physical health".
 
On the back of ISO lobbying, many of the "Group 77" countries ñ the world's poorest ñ are now supporting its position.
 
Under siege from the food and drinks companies, the WHO experts have come out fighting, saying the ability of the world to adopt workable initiatives to tackle its health crisis is in danger of slipping out of reach. Professor Kaare Norum, the most senior scientist involved in the WHO report, wrote last month to US health secretary Thompson accusing the administration of putting the interests of sugar barons ahead of the fight against obesity.
 
Norum accused the US of making the health of millions of young Americans a "hostage to fortune" by failing to act over its obesity epidemic to protect business. Since 1990 successive US governments have blocked WHO calls for action, he claimed.
 
"It is significant that resistance from business interests, which included the sugar industry and soft drinks manufacturers with US government support, was also demonstrated when a previous WHO expert report, based on a scientific consultation in 1990, made similar recommendations intended to prevent diet-related chronic diseases," he wrote. "What has happened to Americans since then? Obesity rates have risen so that now one in three bears the burden of the very high health risks associated with this condition, with the poorest and most vulnerable sectors of society worst affected."
 
This weekend, Norum told the Sunday Herald he would be "mobilising scientists from all over the world" to lobby on WHO's behalf. "The sugar industry has been playing behind the scenes. We are now trying to convince the developing countries that it's not like the sugar industry is saying. You have to place health before business. The sugar industry is being used as a weapon against this global strategy. They say that the science of the report is not good. That is just bullshit. It's robust ."
 
Concern that the strategy may be diluted or scrapped has fuelled letters to Bush from the Senate. Democratic Senator Edward Kennedy expressed concern about the perception that the US is "beholden to outside industry influences" and that its comments about the strategy "were formulated primarily to satisfy trade groups rather than out of concern about public health, chronic disease and obesity."
 
Kennedy added: "Indeed, the objections raised in the administration's comments in the report did largely mirror those raised by food industry trade groups."
 
UK-based Consumers' International said the WHO strategy must succeed. "Obesity isn't just an issue for developed countries, it's one for developing countries. This is a global crisis," said a spokeswoman. "The strategy has set out action for governments but has also called for them to take action in relation to the private sector. That is what the US has had problems with. It has been trying to shift responsibility back towards personal responsibility."
 
For Bush, the issue of fighting the fat lies with the individual, not governments. Many campaigners fear he will appease industry at the expense of world health. Bruce Silverglade, of the US health campaign group Centre for Science in the Public Interest, said: ""We all have a personal responsibility to improve our diets, but doing so, especially for children, is extremely difficult in the current food environment where large portions of high calorie foods are pitched to the public via massive advertising that dwarf government nutrition education programmes."
 
He added: "It is certainly ironic that the nation that inve nted Coca-Cola, fast food, and Twinkies is now trying to tell the world how to combat obesity."
 
Sir Liam Donaldson, the UK's chief medical officer and head of the delegation at the WHO meetings, is said to favour the strategy. This weekend, a department of health spokesman said of the WHO obesity plan: "The UK is supportive of the central thrust of the strategy, and would support its consideration at the World Health Assembly. We welcome the emphasis on promoting activity and diet, with better labelling of foods, which are high in fat, sugar and salt to deliver a more healthy lifestyle."
 
Last week, the Consumers' Association announced it was threatening a boycott of top branded foods unless the government and food industry take action to improve the nation's diet and tackle obesity. According to Sue Davies, senior policy adviser at the Consumers' Association, real power lies with individuals to force change at food and drinks firms and in government. "We believe the major companies and government are not accepting responsibility to make sure food is labelled properly and make it easier for people to choose a healthy diet. Through voicing their concerns customers can make changes. Big business and governments react when they see there is clear consumer demand for change."
 
Obesity: What The Experts Say
 
Dr Riaz Khan, director-general of the World Sugar Research Organisation: "The concept of 'good food and bad food' displayed throughout Report 916 lacks scientific validity. It singles out single elements of the diet, such as sugar, meat, edible oils and dairy products as being unhealthy. It is the most basic of nutritional principles that there are 'good and bad diets', not 'good foods or bad foods'.
 
"Every food can make a valuable contribution to the diet and diet variety; it is getting the balance right that is the key. In the report, sugar has been specifically targeted with the recommendation to limit dietary energy from free sugars to less than 10% of daily energy. WHO Technical Report Series 916 is scientifically flawed and its recommendations to limit consumption of certain foods and increase consumption of others pose serious negative economic implications to a host of food commodities, including sugar."
 
Professor Kaare Norum, chair of the WHO report's working group: "I regard the need for a global strategy on diet to be of paramount importance . There is an extensive body of sound scientific research now available which supports the case for immediate action to improve dietary health through the reduction in the consumption of foods containing high levels of fats, added sugars and salt and soft drinks containing high volumes of calorific sweeteners.
 
"It is significant that resistance from business interests, which included the sugar industry and soft drinks manufacturers with US government support, was also demonstrated when a previous WHO expert report, based on a scientific consultation in 1990, made similar recommendations intended to prevent diet-related chronic diseases.
 
"You have demonstrated admirable leadership in your support for the WHO framework convention on tobacco control, which shows that the US is capable of being a force for good in public health. I urge you to show equal courage and determination to support global efforts to address another of the biggest public health challenges facing us all in the 21st century."
 
Ralph Vance, president of the American Cancer Society: "The tobacco control experience has taught us that policy and environmental changes at national, state and local levels are critical to achieving changes in individual behaviour. Measures such as Clean Air laws and increases in the excise tax on cigarettes are highly effective in deterring tobacco use. To avert an epidemic of obesity-related disease similar purposeful changes in public policy and in the community environment will be required. Without effective policies, the current global trends toward increasing obesity, poor nutrition and physical inactivity will continue unabated. ACS fully supports WHO's efforts to address this important health issue."
 
© newsquest (sunday herald) limited. all rights reserved
 
http://www.sundayherald.com/40258




Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros