- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. publicly proclaimed on September
13, 2001 that the events of 9-11 represented escalated terrorism that could
have only been elevated by two countries: China and the United States.
Thus, the first conclusion was China. On October 11, 2001, two days after
the launch against Afghanistan, Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. addressed
House and Senate Intelligence Committee members indicating that our analysis
from the President?s behavior and the apparent plans in hand by the administration
was that President Bush sought to create political turmoil in Pakistan
and Saudi Arabia. We posited the question whether such strategic design
would serve the longer-term interests of the United States, indicating
that this would not be the case unless President Bush intended to invade
and occupy the Middle East, to wit: Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. This, no
doubt, was a chillingly accurate assessment.
-
- In February 2002, Saudi Arabia and other affiliated Arab/Islamic
nations, to offset this war stratagem launched by President Bush, Saudi
Arabia concluding for itself by then that the Bush administration was brazenly
complicit in 9-11 as the necessary and needed pretext for its war stratagem,
for the first time in history, offered and supported a Middle East peace
initiative.
-
- While this was welcomed publicly by the Bush administration,
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. pointed out that the process evolving therefrom
was one that the United States knew would fail and thus intended it to
fail. The only reason therefor was to predicate the war stratagem to invade
Iraq, Syria and Iran. In terms of the Middle East, this strategm would
manifestly serve the secular interests of Israel. However, on other plateaus
and dimensions, it would serve President Bush?s dual plane agendas of securing
control of Middle Eastern oil for those aligned with Bush family oil and
political interests and was a further and necessary predicate to implement
globalization and one world government.
-
- The only impediment to the success of this plan was the
one missed: that Saddam Hussein would not only fail to launch WMD, creating
the second platform of moral outrage for masked military aggression into
Syria and Iran, but that the backstop would fail: WMD would not be found.
This put not only President Bush but also Tony Blair into a major political
quagmire.
-
- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. on March 29, 2003, in the
midst of the invasion against Iraq, concluded that President Bush wanted
to find WMD regardless of whether Saddam possessed them or not, to not
only abate his and Blair's personal political situation but to implement
the platform for the completion of the true full scope of his mission.
-
- Tony Blair balked at supporting this course and became
troubled himself at discovering no doubt the rabid intent of the Bush administration
in terms of 9-11 and the manner it went out to compromise long term sovereign
interests of the United States. After Blair was subject to unrelenting
domestic attacks and faced a defined future as a failed Prime Minister
(no doubt with full covert support of Bush to push Blair into supporting
his plan), Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. interpreted that Bush received
Blair?s agreement to his original scheme to find WMD.
-
- Now, Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. highlights that Kay
and others who were strongly supportive of the President, were now critical;
the media who would not address the point, now seems to pursue it with
relish; the President who reigns more in line with a historically deposed
aristocrat and autocrat than a President respectful of the precepts of
this Republic and the precedent before him, suddenly warmed to the idea
of an investigation concerning the lies and misrepresentations the predicate
for war.
- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. consequently detected with
a high level of confidence that President Bush is ready when Karl Rove
gives him the green light to announce the discovery of WMD, no doubt under
the umbrella of obtaining their location from a talking Saddam.
-
- On another dimension, the consequence of President Bush?s
failed war stratagem, the Bush team serving primarily the agenda for global
government over U.S. domestic interests, highlighted by its abrasive posture
toward exporting American jobs, faced a historically dimished U.S. dollar.
President Bush again showed that U.S. sovereign interests were not paramount
to this administration, allowing the dollar to fall to keep oil prices
stable for Europe and Asia economic prosperity. In the meantime, the U.S.
market soared in a near exact inverse relationship with the drop in the
US dollar. Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. offered an audiovisual presentation
of the issue.
-
- The bottom line was that if President Bush could not
get OPEC to materially drop the price of oil, the Bush administration would
have to make a choice in Febraury 2004: serve its political interests and
that of Europe and Asia, by allowing the dollar to plunge to even lower
levels, allowing the stock market to soar into the November elections,
further keeping oil prices stable for Europe and Asia, or protect the U.S.
dollar and keep in check deeper longer term dark consequences for the U.S.
-
- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. in early 1997, prior to
any claimed pronouncement by PNAC, interpreted in Recapturing America that
the agenda in play was to undermine the U.S. dollar. Due to the failed
Bush stratagem, and the need for President Bush to effectuate control via
regime change in Syria and Iran, President Bush will move on two fronts
against Syria and Iran: finding WMD with no doubt a created link to Syria
and/or Iran and now, based on the President new global pronouncement, his
intent under the NSS to neutralize any country failing to relinquish its
nexus to nuclear development whether military or commercial.
-
- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. points to what it wrote
on June 8, 1998, post Recapturing America, as conclusive to our understanding
that the Bush war stratagem is not only destined to fail (putting the Middle
East if not the world into a state of global war) but that the victims
include the American people and sovereign interests of this country. Failure
to understand and respond to this reality will allow history to conclude
that the American people squandered the opportunity to save their country,
its Constitution, its Judeo-Christian precepts, and the heritage that stood
against slavery, oppression and injustice carried by European elitists,
denounced and defeated by the American and French Revolutions, who have
come back to snatch the wealth lost to what they see were a bunch of terrorists
in 1776.
-
- See www.senderberl.com/fp/notes.htm for the annotated
version.
-
- Joseph B. Ehrlich
- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
- www.senderberl.com
- February 12, 2004
-
- We implore you to listen to the entire Jeff Rense-Alex
Jones interview we have highlighted on our site.
|
