- 1859 saw the publication of "The Origin of the Species"
by Charles Darwin" Henry Dunant founded the Red Cross, after having
experienced the suffering of the ordinary soldier during the Battle of
Solferino (France and Sardinia under Napoleon III. fought Austria under
Francis Joseph I.) 1 [1]. This progressive humanitarian measure was paralleled
by the conservative elitist foundation of the Anthropological Society in
Paris by Paul Broca who had started to "pickle" the brains of
eminent personalities.
-
- Strange things were happening in a world where artificial
lighting had turned the night into day and where man extended his effective
life-span by some 30% 2 [2]. The first oil-well near Titusville in Pennsylvania
had been drilled; John David Rockefeller and Maurice Clark formed a trading
company which soon should become Standard Oil, forming a huge monopoly
by concentrating 96% of the refining capacity of the USA in one hand [3].
In the beginning [4] they profited from provisioning of troops in the War
of Union against Confederates, later then from outfitting (arming) "pioneers"
in their war against nature and humanity.
1859 also saw the start of huge migration of Ashkenazi Jewry from what
is now the region of Ukraine into western parts of Europe. The "Eastern
Jews" swamped Europe and brought with them little else but the shirts
on their backs as well as intellectual and artistic brilliance. Immediately
these immigrants made their presence felt in all walks of life. Scientific
research and discovery took a giant leap forwards, when Ashkenazim ability
was seeded into the fertile soil of a continent which was in the process
of emerging out of the age of feudal reign.
-
-
-
- When in 1863 the carnage due to modern weapons had taken
a huge toll on the largely volunteer Forces of both combatants in the American
War of Secession, conscription was introduced (first by the Confederates).
Until then, the land-owners of the South had been fighting for their "rights",
while the soldiers for the North had been spilling their blood in order
to maintain the tax-income for the Union. The new Union President Abraham
Lincoln [5] had the "daring" idea to get motivated fresh blood
into the reservoir of cannon-fodder by promising Blacks their freedom
[6] if they helped to defeat the South. In 2 years the war was won for
the North, the Negro nominally then freed but still stayed a de-facto slave.
Almost 140 years later one wonders whether emancipation was the same kind
of labelling-fraud as was the eventual outcome of the Civil Rights Movement.
It is now hardly ever commented on, but the American Civil War "happened"
while the Oil Industry was being established. Some 600.000 lives were ruthlessly
wasted between 1861 and 1865 for "ideals" which when viewed today
were phoney (at best) and to no material effect (as in betterment of the
lives of the people). What had really happened was that a very few people
had laid the foundations to very great wealth and dominance. John Davison
Rockefeller was born in Richford, New York, on July 8, 1839 (d. 1937),
and educated in the public schools of Cleveland, Ohio. He became a bookkeeper
in Cleveland at the age of 16. In 1862 he went into business with entrepreneur
Henry Flagler and with Samuel Andrews, the inventor of an inexpensive process
for the "refining" of crude petroleum. In 1870 their company
was renamed into Standard Oil (of Ohio) Company and in 1872 J.D. Rockefeller
founded the "South Improvement Co.", which had amalgamated by
1887 all but a few percent of Americas refining capacity in one hand and
became a corporate giant of such vast might that it in effect was a "running"
America. The USA was fighting another brutal "War of Independence"
(this time from Standard Oil) which it won in 1911, when the Rockefeller
monopoly was dismantled. Just as in the case of the other War of Independence,
victory was an elusive concept.
The rest of the 20th century has been called by many in very simple terms
as "Rockefellers Revenge". To all intents and purposes, this
was a "re-Volution" -- as it effectively re-established the
dominance of the Oil-Industry over American politics and the American people.
What has changed, is the fact that not only the American people are pushed
around the chess-board, but most of mankind was made into pawns in the
game of "Big Oil".
1823 US-President Monroe had (in wise prescience) declared the Americas
as "off-limits" to any other polity and the world was divided
into the "Western Hemisphere" and the rest. Zischka (see endnote#
3) gave a chronological account of oil industry,s early development. It
turns out that there were early in the 20th century two major players on
this stage, with an early contender for "second place":
-
- * John Davison Rockefeller, son of a Rabbi come
haberdasher and purveyor of comforts to the men in the Pennsylvania oil
fields. He focused his attention on the "downstream" side of
the oil industry and established by the late 1880ies an almost total monopoly
on transport and refining of crude oil.
-
- * Henry Deterding, an enterprising young Dutchman
had clerked in a bank in Batavia (Jakarta) when at the turn of the century
the Duri Oil Field in Sumatra was discovered. He was a quick study --
became involved in the company holding the lease over this oil field and
by 1902 had risen to the Presidency of this company. Deterding was determined
to seek domination over the Oil Industry via the ownership of concessions.
-
- * The "side-show" developed in the northern
foothills of the Caucasus mountains. A brother of the inventor of Dynamite
Alfred Nobel, was sent by his father, who at this time was an arms manufacturer
supplying the Imperial Russian army with guns, into the Caucasus region
to secure a supply of walnut-wood to be turned into gun-stocks. Instead
he came back with owner-ship of the oil concessions on what is known now
as the Baku region of Azerbaijan.
The House of Rothschild, through its various branches established by the
sons of Amschel Mayer [7] ("Rothschild" -- after the label
on his house in the Frankfurt Ghetto) in London, Paris and Vienna financed
- the Rockefeller Oil Imperia in America,
-
- - the emerging alliance of the Dutch and English
Royal Houses to take control over the Oil Fields in the Far East (soon
to be named Royal Dutch Shell) and
-
- - the Russian oil field operations controlled
by the Nobel family.
Like always, the third player got mangled up in the tussle between the
two strongest ones [8]: after the oil in the Persian Gulf region had been
discovered (over which the British secured control) the Nobel family was
forced by a "no holds barred" price war between Rockefeller and
Deterding to "sell out". In order to win this fight, Deterding
teamed up with Lord Samuels of London, who established the oil shipping
industry. It would be too cumbersome to detail this epic struggle- just
one fact should make the attentive reader sit up: Josef Stalin spent his
early political life as organiser of the Oil-Workers Union in and around
Baku! Another fact to ponder: the Russian Revolution kept Russian oil off
the world-market for quite some time.
In the early 20th century the British Empire began to fray around the edges
and First Lord of the Admiralty Captain (later Lord) Fisher argued for
the (re-)fitting the Royal Navy with oil- powered engines, giving these
ships a definite speed advantage over coal-powered steam-ships. With the
closest supply (then) being in the Persian Gulf, the British meddling in
Middle-Eastern Affairs becomes understandable. This then sounded the death-knell
for the Ottoman Empire, which was in control of this region until the end
of WW I. That virtually all the oil-supplies for the German Empire came
from the Mossul-field in present Iraq explains the fighting in the Dardanelles
(Gallipoli) during WW I.- the German Oil supplies had to be disrupted.
When we look at the geography of the region and follow the rail-road line
from Mossul to Berlin, we will notice, that with the exception of less
than 100 km, this line ran entirely in Entente territory. The little piece
of land missing was Serbia! The assassination of Austrian Crown-Prince
Francis-Ferdinand on 27. June 1914 in Sarajewo (the capital of Serbia!)
takes on an entirely different "flavour". The rest is bloody
history, or as Kronberger so bluntly puts it (see endnote# 3) in Blood
for Oil .
After WW I. the domestic oil industry in America swamped the country with
cheap oil. After the discovery of oil in Venezuela, the Smoot-Hartley Act
enacted by the American Congress ostensibly was designed to keep oil from
Venezuela destroying the price of this abundant commodity. What it in effect
did, however, was that it exported American recession globally. The rest
is -- yet again -- bloody history.
-
- One of the (other) remarkable results of WW II was that
the American Oil Industry got involved in the exploitation of the Persian
Gulf region (see Yergin, endnote# 3). As from that time on, the Middle
East was racked with one after the other war that sent the oil-price spiralling
sky-wards.
-
- At the end of the 20th century the American War Machine
had gotten so awesome, that in the absence of a credible opponent a "replacement
monster" had to be found [9]. This is where the perpetual "side-show"
of 20th century history comes in: the systematic terrorism with which Israel
perpetrates Genocide among the Palestinian owners of the land promised
(but not given) to World-Jewry by the British Empire causes symptomatic
terrorism [10]. The entire situation, caused by the Balfour Declaration,
is unsolvable by peaceful means, as no amount of good will (from either
side) will ever overcome the need for instability in the region to "justify"
inflated oil prices and provide "use" for over 50% of industrial
production, which is arms-related.
This is where "Terrorism" -- yet again -- rears its ugly head.
Alexandre de Tocqueville described "régime de la terreur"
as a methodology to make the masses familiar with the realities created
by elites [11].
While all this was happening, events unfolded on the other side of the
globe which went entirely unnoticed by most then and hence their eventual
outcomes, which determine the lives of a large portion of mankind at the
present time, seem mysterious. That need not be, as there is an interplay
of sinister "games" at work which are so plain and obvious as
to be not cases of the proverbial needle on the hay-stack or trees being
hidden in a forest!
-
- Already since 1757, the British had a trade-agreement
with the Chinese Qing Dynasty which limited all trade between the two nations
to the harbour of Canton (Guangzhou). In the early 19th century British
ships were carrying millions of Kilo-grams of Chinese tea to England, while
bringing as return freight only silver bullion. When declining to open
the Chinese market to British industrial products, Emperor Qianlong declared
in the classic statement to King George III:
"We possess all things. I set no value on objects strange or ingenious,
and have no use for your country,s manufactures."
Opium had been known since long as an intoxicating drug in China, but its
use was forbidden by Imperial Decree dating back to 1729[12]. The English
East India Company (EEIC) was cultivating huge poppy-fields in India[13]
and selling the drug illegally to China. So the earlier ban on the use
was given added currency in 1796 by another Imperial Decree which banned
the trading/ sale of opium in China. When in 1833 the monopoly of the EEIC
was broken up (an early case of "liberalization" -- with the
ususal catastrophic effects of unbridled de-regulation!), China was swamped
with Opium from India and not only the idle rich, but the common man got
addicted to the drug. By late 1838, emperor Qianlong sent his emissary
Lin Zexu to Canton to stop the Opium trade. This audacious man simply held
the foreign traders hostage and demanded their departure under threat to
their lives. The British trade commissioner Charles Elliott collected all
the opium from the (British) traders and handed it over to Lin Zexu, who
proceeded to wash 9 Million Mexican Silver Dollars (the international Currency
of the time) worth of opium into the sea. England dispatched an expeditionary
force which easily won (due to modern arms and strategy) against a vastly
superior number of ill-equipped soldiers, led by generals who had no idea
of what modern war-fare was all about and in the Treaty of Nanjing (Nanking)
on August 29, 1842 Englands original goals were fulfilled: The cohong (Chinese
Trading Association through which foreigners- effectively British- traders
had to work was abolished, four more Chinese ports were opened to trade
(Fuzhou, Ningbo, Shanghai, and Xiamen), and the island of Hong Kong was
ceded to the British.
Just like World War II. had effectively started with the insidious Versailles
Peace Treaty, the Second Opium War was an inevitable outcome of the Nanjing
Agreement: when in 1856 the ARROW , a ship owned by a Hong Kong resident
was searched by a party of Chinese officials for a notorious criminal,
the British flag was taken down and this escalated the shouting into a
shooting war. This is when the French joined the fray and together British
and French expeditionary forces threatened the capital Peking. In the dictated
Peace Treaty of Tianjin trading rights and the rights to establish diplomatic
representations in Peking were granted. When this treaty was to be ratified
the next year, the British delegation (some 400 men on three ships) were
routed and this then resulted in the forceful ingression of British and
French forces into Peking in 1860. The Qing Dynasty lingered on until 1911,
when it finally broke up under western pressure. What Voltaire had once
called the most advanced and enlightened form of government had been reduced
by "western" dum possum volo (because I can, I want) to an ineffective
puppet regime.
This is one facet of the evil game which was played in the 19th century
in East-Asia. The other was the occupation of Vietnam by French forces
in 1862[14]. As France had no strategic interests in that part of the world
at that time, this venture had to finance itself. It was of no material
economic importance either and one has to seriously wonder why France started
nearly one hundred years of misery for an untold number of people on the
opposite side of the globe.
-
- In order to raise money required to establish
a multinational crime syndicate, the new colonial power began to regulate
the drug trade in the country. Until 1954, when the French were unceremoniously
"kicked out" of Vietnam, elements of the French Secret Service
were controlling the French military presence in Vietnam (French Indo-China).
An (effectively private) Army of up to 40,000 troops and some 350 French
Officers (Foreign Legion) had to be financed by the drug trade. The entire
French "colonial" enterprise in that part of the world was a
largely private enterprise based on organized crime sanctioned on the highest
political levels.
It now seems very strange, that out of a French private adventure (which
had made a few French entrepreneurs very rich) could develop the American
Nightmare of the Vietnam War . The old colonial powers had been running
the colonial charade for centuries: entire nations were pressed into service
to generate vast wealth for a very small number of people who were the
froth on the sociologically fermenting vats, that the "mother-nations"
to the colonial states had become.
-
- America had to learn that one cannot break a deal with
one of the oldest civilized nations for the simple reason that one was
able to (the USA used nuclear bombs to shock Japan into surrender and the
deal Stalin and Roosevelt had made regarding the sharing of the territorial
spoils after WW II. was "off"). The Korean War was the outcome
of this broken promise. What was "sold" to the stupid (unknowing)
populations as a clash of ideologies, was little more than the grand-standing
of intellectual midgets: "Look- I got a bigger nuke than you!"
The Korean Peninsula was brutally separated into two halves in order to
achieve what had been arranged by Stalin and Roosevelt a decade earlier:
a sharing of the region! While the people in the North had no political
rights by law and were slaves to a "one size fits all" economy,
the ones in the South had effectually no "rights" and were pressed
into service of Korean and American economic tyrants. To the average
American citizen (especially in those days), the "developing"
situation in Vietnam seemed to be a continuation of the clash of ideologies
that had gone on a decade earlier on the "other peninsula over there".
Plotinus, the Alexandrian philosopher in the second century AD had cautioned
that every evolution had to be preceded by an "involution". So
what had wound the clock in Vietnam?
When in 1954 French General Navarre had lost the strategic, fortified city
of Dien Bien Phu to the Viet Cong under the brilliant leadership of General
Giap, the colonial adventure of the French in the Far East had become an
orphan in need of a generous "uncle". Always happy to prop up
a repressive regime which provided the "freedom" for corporate
economy to wreak havoc, the USA was drawn into the next vortex of military
conflict. What started as a loan of military "advisors" developed
into a full blown military conflict of epic proportions.
The socio-political effect of this scenario on the entire world was incredibly
hefty: all of South-East Asia turned into a brothel with American soldiers
on R&R and again, this war was largely "run" by the American
Secret Service. "Air America", the aviation wing of the CIA was
for a long time the biggest airline in the world (see footnote# 17). While
the military was fighting a war in accordance with political doctrine and
within the framework of International Law, the CIA financed the destruction
of much of South East Asia and American (western) Society by drug-running.
-
- Only few ever saw that the arrow was also
the target- a logically thinking democratic society would not permit its
own dregs to pervert the methodology of government into the modus operandi
of an organised crime syndicate. Blum points out that over the two decades
of (official) American military presence in SE-Asia the region had turned
into the (clandestine) producer of some 70% of the heroin and opium which
gets consumed in the USA 15 [15]. The dealing of drugs and arms are an
essential part of the destabilizing tactics 16 [16] which have been and
still are visited on the most populous region on Earth.
It is interesting to note, that while in the 19th century the British used
China as their playground and sold there drugs which had been produced
in India using the military power of the Empire in order to be able to
do so, America used a phoney war (financed by the American tax-payer) to
set up the logistics needed to produce the drugs required to turn the American
people into zombies. In both instances the "social cost" was
immeasurable, the beneficiaries an extremely small number of "personalities"
and neither of the two episodes had been possible without knowledge, condoning
and complicity of the highest levels of government (and "high society").
-
- Who can be surprised to learn, that the Israeli Secret
Service MOSSAD "runs" a similar operation in Lebanon; local opposition
to this illicit drug industry is (as Robert Fisk, The INDEPENDENT, 11.12.2002,
points out) the major drive behind the Hizbollah-"Terrorism".
In early 2003 the newspapers and TV-News Channels were having a jolly good
time "informing" the world on how Israel-based operations swamp
the yuppie-scene with Ecstasy. That the largely Jewish-owned Media was
reporting on such anti-social Jewish activities hinted at a more important
agenda. This was closely followed by the Media-induced SARS hysteria. The
"Rape of Iraq" will relieve Israel from having to buy expensive
oil and ensure that "Big Brother" will render for a long time
to come Arab opposition to the kind of treatment handed out to the Palestinian
people ineffective.
The Iran-Contra Affair overshadowed much of the Reagan Administration
and the shady "activities" at the Mena Air-Field in Arkansas
(while Bill Clinton acted as Governor of the state) led up to the G.H.
Bush presidency. All this will surely be followed by disclosures of similar
"activities" in the meantime (if and when the present stranglehold
over the media is broken). Robbins (op.cit.) details the involvement of
the CIA (through Air America) in all of these strange affairs. One is tempted
to suspect, that the surest way to stop the trafficking of drugs and ridding
the world of the menace of the drug-industry were the immediate disassembly
of Secret Services. Countless numbers of lives could be saved (or made
less miserable).
Will this ever happen?
The answer is simply - NO! Such a move would effectively remove one of
the most effective "tools" of government- (elitist) control over
the masses, the ubiquitous use of the chimera of "National Security"
as a smokescreen behind which "secret" actions are taking place
which ostensibly are in the interest of the nation. The New Political Order
which comes hand in glove with the merging of Communism and Capitalism
into globalist practices is a house of cards without any real sustainability.
It is a somber fact, that some 200 multi- (trans-) national corporations
control and their share-holders own over 95% of all "private"
business which is not owned by privatiers but "share-holders".
The flip-side of this medal is the further fact, that all of this economic
activity employs only some 0.3% of the global work-force 17 [17].
-
- From this it follows, that the corporate
economy, which accounts for the majority of activities which continually
and progressively degrade the quality of life (all life) is supported in
all this by the private and public sectors: they not only provide the vast
majority of all employment which is to say the wherewithall to purchase
the products of the corporate sector, but also generate yet again the majority
of all tax-revenue.
¨ corporate enterprise and entrepreneurs in 1983 paid 13.1% of
all taxes levied in Germany; after 13 years of Kohl-government this had
been reduced to 5.7% 18 [18]
-
- ¨ 1955 the Canadian corporate sector paid still
some 25% of all taxes, by 1998 this had been reduced to 12.2% 19 [19].
Moore 20 [20] gives actualised figures for the USA which tell the same
"story"; such as:
-
- ¨ betweeen 1979 and 2002 the income of the
richest percent of the American population rose by 157% , while that of
the poorest 20% has in fact fallen
-
- ¨ profits for the richest 20 "concerns"
of the world rose since 1983 by 362,4%
-
- ¨ after the latest round of "fusion"
oft the Oil-Industry , the profits of oil-companies rose by 146% -- at
a time when the oil-moguls decry the fact that they are "not making
any money..."! [It is a sore fact, that global economy is again- as
some 80 years ago --literally drowning in cheap oil!]
-
- ¨ 44 of the biggest 82 corporations in the USA
paid taxes at a rate of 17%, while the "man on the street" pays
35%; 17% of American corporations paid no tax (!) while 7 corporations
(among them General Motors) have in their 2001 tax returns claimed to be
due amounts paid over and above the amount required
-
- ¨ 1279 corporations with incomes of in excess
of US$ 250 Millionen Dollar or more paid no taxes and declared no taxable
income.
When during the 1980ies the term "Globalisation" became a catch-phrase,
many began to talk of the "Two-Thirds Society"; Martin &
Schumann (op. cit.) spoke at the turn of the Millennia of the 80:20 society;
how much longer until "democratic" societies decay into a 90:10,
or -- as has to be feared with ever more reason- even the 99:1 "society"?
In the knowledge of all the above facts (which are little more than the
tip of an ice-berg), the only meaningful question can be: how can this
have come to pass? Is this not an age where we have almost global democracy,
where only a few rogue states still totally disregard human rights (with
concentration camps and genocidal tactics aimed at ethnic minorities)?
Is this not the "Information Age", where the news are reported
"life" and we can know everything there is to know?
In Venezuela, a country which for the better part of a century has not
been permitted stable government by an oil-industry which strives on instability,
a former military officer is fighting a pretty hopeless war against American
Secret Services. Army general Melvin Lopez told in an interview with the
Venezuelan state-owned radio station on 21.04.2002 that American agents
were behind the attempted coup d,etat against President Chavez on 11.04.2002;
official American denials abound and have to be weighed against the "noises"
from the White House: US President G.W. Bush, himself an appointed "Fuehrer",
has been heard to demand the replacement of Chavez (who has been elected
twice by overwhelming popular vote) with a "democratic" leader.
It is not so much the intellectual level of the person that is permitted
to make such idiotic statements, but rather that of his audience, which
is cause for great concern.
September 11 was a most remarkable day in the 2oth century and early 3rd
Millennium:
¨ in 1920 the League of Nations promulgated a decree giving the
Balfour Declaration a status of international "respectability"
-
- ¨ in 1973 a CIA sponsored coup led to the ouster
of Salvador Allende, the democratically elected President of Chile
-
- ¨ in 1995 a New York court found a group of
Iranian exiles guilty of having placed and detonated a bomb in the underground
parking space of one of the World Trade Center towers
-
- ¨ in 2001 both World Trade Center towers collapsed
after "Hollywood-style" attacks on them. None of the "evidence"
presented by authorities does appear to merit any credibility; it is not
surprising, that dubious language is used when the Media crank out yet
another "report" on the alleged perpetrators of this heinous
act.
The entire world is effectively terrorised by a nation which has freed
itself from all that was ever good about it. Former Treasury Secretary
ONeill has written a book on his time in government. Most elucidating is,
that he mentions that President G.W. Bush has issued orders to his government
almost immediately after taking office (more than half a year prior to
9-11!) for the actions which were "sold" to the public of America
(and the world) as retaliation for 9-11. Paul O'Neill talked to CBS News
Correspondent Lesley Stahl in a 60 Minutes interview on January 11, 2004
about this remarkable situation. This lets all the doubts which surround
the entire sitaution disappear -- it is high time for the thinking people
of the world to "take cover".
The actions of "Big Oil", the "War on Drugs" and the
"War on Terrorism" are turning our blue little planet into what
German scientist and philosopher P. J. Beumer has already in 1858 recognised
in his Naturgeschichte (natural history):
a graveyard within which higher developed life will exist in the future
-presupposing that "present" life will prepare this "graveyard".
[1] like with all "inventions", there is chauvinism clouding
the issue: Anglo-American dictum has it, that the nurse Florence Nightingale
is to be credited with forcing the emergence of this humanitarian measure
during the Crimean War (which "happened" some years later.....).
For all it is worth -- this simply shows that the inhumaneness of technolgically
assisted war-fare let people "wake up"
-
- [2] it is amazing -- there is not one single investigation
into the effects of this most extraordinary change in the "human condition"
by institutionalised science. Nobody seems to be concerned about the artificiality
of it all; just like nobody seems to be concerned about the effects of
industrialised agriculture and farming......
-
- [3] Zischka, A.: Ölkrieg. Wandlung der Weltmacht
Öl. Goldmann, Leipzig, 1939. Kronberger, H.: Blut für Öl.
Uranus, Wien, ISBN: 3 901626 08 5, 1998 has six decades later updated the
gruesome story of the second biggest "business" after the drug
trade. Yergin, D.: The Prize. The Quest for Oil, Money and Power. Touchstone,
New York, ISBN 0671799320, 1993 has written an ecyclopaedic history of
the Oil-Business [caveat lector -- this book is a factual treasure trove,
but all too often it is apparent that "conclusions" reached are
largely "whitewashes" of white-collar criminality]
-
- [4] The corporate successor to Standard Oil (in Joint
Venture with I.G. Farben) was operating Concentration Camps in Germany
during WW II. Tarpley, W.G. & A. Chaitkin: George Bush: The Unauthorized
Biography; find a pdf-file on the Internet with google.com
-
- [5] who looks now quite a bit of a "strawman":
every respectable encyclopaedia will tell that the representative (and
relative) of the Rothschild dynasty Judah P. Benjamin (1811-84), acted
at different times during the American Civil War as Attorney General, Minister
of Foreign Affairs, Finance and War for the "South". The "architect
of the Secession" was able to flee to England after the Confederates
had been defeated and worked there as successful barrister. That his Treatise
on the Law of Sale of Personal Property (1868) became a legal classic in
Britain speaks a clear language
-
- [6] this could be phrased as: The president of one nation
promised the people of another nation something that he had no right to
do; on top of that the fullfullment of the promise was conditional on winning
a war. The Rothschilds repeated this strategy with the "Balfour Declaration
Caper" with equal success some 60 years later and the labelling-fraud
regarding "intentions" continued unabatedly
-
- [7] we forget -- at our own peril -- that Amschel Mayer
Rothschild should be remembered for his saying that "the best times
for making money is when blood is flowing on the streets".....
-
- [8] the "exclusion principle" at work. Gause,
G.F.: The Struggle for Existence. S.112, Williams & Wilkins. Baltimore.
1934 -one ecological niche -- one species
-
- [9] Tibi B.: Die Neue Weltunordnung; p. 57, Econ-Ullstein,
München, ISBN 3548750117, 2001
-
- [10] Hoffman, M.& M. Liebermann: The Israeli Holocaust
Against the Palestinians, Independent History; ISBN: 0970378424, 2002
-
- [11] Tocqueville, A. de: The Old Regime and the French
Revolution. Translated by S. Gilbert. Anchor Books, Doubleday, New York,
ISBN 0-385-09260-1, 1955. (Will historians ever forgive him for having
questioned the significance of the French Revolution for the "development
of humanity"? When Jürgen Habermas views the American and French
revolutions as pivotal point in human history, he surely only thinks the
history of elitist domination. (Habermas, J.: Der philosophische Diskurs
der Moderne. 12 Vorlesungen, Frankfurt/M., 1985) The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion (Marsden, V.E.: (transl.): The Protocols of the Meetings
of the Elders of Zion. p. 185. In: Ford, H: The International Jew. Global
Publishers, Johannesburg, 1992. ) take responsibiliy (in fact "demand"
to be given credit for) these "revolutions" and the emergence/
establishment of "Zionism" Turner, J.H. & L. Beeghley: The
Emergence of Sociological Theory. p.19, Dorsey Press, Homewood, Ill., ISBN
0256024162, 1981 call these revolutions as the evolutionary culmination
of economic, social, political and intellectual changes; as usual with
cases of labelling-fraud, they give no causative principlre but offer only
an alphabeth-soup.
-
- [12] it has to be noted, that also paper, gun-powder
and the compass had been in use in China for many hundred years before
they were "discovered" in Europe. So why did China not use them
to "rule the world" like Europe did?
-
- [13] that this operation was owned by the Montague family
should not come as a surprise -- a century later Norman Montague (as Governor
of the Bank of England) "installed his protege Hjalmar Schacht as
Finance Minister into the Hitler regime....). What is depicted as "necessity"
for the masses almost always turns out as a "chance" for elites
-
- [14] Robbins, Ch.: Air America. From World War II to
Vietnam. P. 234, The Explosive True Story of the CIA,s Secret Airline.
Macmillan, 1979. Corgi Books, ISBN 974-8303-51-9, 1988
-
- [15] Blum, W.: Rogue State, p.129, Zed Books, London,
ISBN 184277221X, 2002
-
- [16] Calder, K. E.: Asia's Deadly Triangle: How Arms,
Energy, and Growth Threaten to Destabilize AsiaPacific. Nicholas Brealey;
ISBN: 1857881613; 1997.
-
- [17] Loy, D.A,: Can Corporations become Enlightened?
Buddhist Reflections on TNC,s. In: Camilleri, J.A. & Ch. Muzaffar (eds.):
Globalisation: The Perspectives and Experiences of the Religious Traditions
of Asia Pacific. S. 5 ff., JUST, Selangor, Malaysia, ISBN 983 9861093,
1998
-
- [18] Martin, H.-P. & H. Schumann: The Global Trap:
Globalisation and the Assault on Prosperity and Democracy. p. 101. Zed
Books; ISBN: 185649 53 02. 1997
-
- [19] Klein, N.: NoLogo. p.472, Flamingo / Harper Collins,
ISBN 0006530400, London, 2001
-
- [20] Moore, M.: Stupid White Men. Eine Abrechnung mit
dem Amerika unter George W. Bush. p. 79, Piper, München, ISBN 3492
045170, 2002
|
