Rense.com




Big Budget Enviro-Doom
Film May Put Heat On Bush

The Guardian
3-14-4


LOS ANGELES - Here's the pitch: a dullish candidate, outflanked by his opponent's serious money, attacked for his liberal leanings, is swept to an unlikely victory thanks to a blockbuster movie that focuses on the effects of big business and the agro-industrial complex.
 
Audiences throw their popcorn aside, pick up their ballot papers andrealise that they too can make a difference. The studio behind the movie:20th Century Fox, owned by Rupert Murdoch. The director: Roland Emmerich;no Martin Sheen-style bleeding heart Democrat but the brawn behind Independence Day.
 
It sounds unlikely, but this summer might just see an alliance ofcommerce, populist entertainment and feel-good concern combine to weakenPresident George Bush and hand votes to his expected Democrat rival JohnKerry.
 
On the other hand, the film could tank, like one of its director's othermonster-budget summer openings, Godzilla. May 28 sees the worldwide release of The Day After Tomorrow, the eco-armageddon story to beat all others.
 
The first trailers for the film, released on the internet last week, give a taste of the scale of the eco-horrors to come. Filmed in a combination of slick computer generated special effects and faux newscast verite, tidal waves sweep across cities and snow piles halfway up the towers of Manhattan as disjointed voices articulate the chaos around them."What you are seeing is happening now," says a breathless newsreader.
 
"Look over behind me," shouts a TV reporter, "that's a tornado, yes, atwister." The film cuts to a volcano erupting next to the Hollywood signin Los Angeles. A huge flock of birds flies across the sky, a mass of people is seen crossing the Rio Grande between Mexico and the United States.
 
Filmed with a budget of more than $100m and special effects said to bethe greatest thing since, well, since the last big budget movie, the filmhas one other difference to other Hollywood blockbusters: it has a conscience."At some point during the filming we looked around at all the lights,generators and trucks and we realised the very process of making thispicture is contributing to the problem of global warming," the directorand producers say in a statement on the film's official website. "Wecouldn't avoid putting CO2 into the atmosphere during the shoot, but wediscovered we could do something to make up for it; we could make the filmCarbonNeutral."
 
The film's website includes a lengthy list of internet links toorganisations that have researched the effects of global warming. Duringfilming last year, Emmerich described the film as "a popcorn movie that'sactually a little subversive".
 
Whether this is the typical hype that surrounds a Hollywood blockbusteror the heartfelt statement of a tortured artist does not really matter.What seems certain is that the film will help to propel global warming andthe environment high up the political agenda.
 
President Bush is known to be sceptical about the possibility of globalwarming, while the environment is a traditional strong card for the Democrats. With issues such as oil drilling rights in Alaska playing strongly among some voters, the president's opponents have regularly attacked him for the favouritism he is perceived to have shown to the fossil fuel giants that dominate the US economy.The Pentagon even got in on the act, releasing a study last month thatsuggested that one outcome of global warming could be the rise of masscivil unrest. In one scenario, drought, famine and rioting erupt across theworld, spurred on by climate change. As nations face dwindling food supplies and scarce natural resources, conflict becomes the norm.
 
"Disruption and conflict will be endemic features of life," says thePentagon study. "Once again, warfare would define human life.""The climate is going to play a significant role in the campaign," saidLuke Breit, chairman of the Democrat's environmental caucus in California,where the environment is traditionally a key political issue. "John Kerryis mentioning clean air and water at every opportunity. It's going to be onthe first tier of issues. Our job is to make clear how anti-environment thegovernment has been."
 
But while it can be fortuitous for an event such as a mass appeal movie tocome along and propel an issue to the forefront of voters' consciousness,there are also pitfalls. "The danger is it could make it look moretrivial," said Mr Breit. "My guess is that people in the environmentalleadership around the country are holding their breath. I'm hoping thatit's going to be very good and that we have great entertainment value butthat at the same time it treats the science seriously."
 
One US environmental pressure group has already enlisted the help of one ofthe film's stars, Jake Gyllenhaal, to help promote its agenda while promoting the film.The Day After Tomorrow's advance publicity suggests a typical Hollywoodmix of fact, fantasy and hype: fake weather reports and testimonies fromfans about where they would like to be the day the world dies are mixed with earnest exhortations to help avert global warming.
 
And Hollywood has been here before. The Perfect Storm, Armageddon andTwister all combined Hollywood's love of little people battlinginsurmountable natural - and unnatural - powers while giving great specialeffects.
 
"In Independence Day Roland Emmerich brought you the near destruction of the earth by aliens," says the website. "Now, in The Day After Tomorrow, the enemy is an even more devastating force: nature itself." It'll have them voting in the aisles.
 
 
Copyright © 2004, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu




Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros