Rense.com




Martha's Indiscretion Trivial
Against Enron Malefactors

By Andrew Gumbel
The Independent - UK
3-5-4



Martha Stewart may be the most eye-catching of the recent crop of corporate miscreants to come to public attention, but she is by some distance also the most trivial.
 
For all the brouhaha generated by her celebrity status, she was only ever accused of a personal indiscretion cashing in stock in a friend's company just before a damaging government report sent the share price spiralling downwards.
 
Admittedly the size of the indiscretion was not entirely trivial. We're talking about $230,000 (£125,000) that she took away from her friend Samuel Waksal's medical research firm ImClone. But that's small beer compared with the management team at Enron, who set up shell companies overseas to paint a deeply misleading picture of the company's profitability, avoided paying corporate taxes almost completely, sucked the pension fund dry while raking in seven-figure bonuses for themselves and eventually drove the seventh-largest corporation in the United States into the ground.
 
Small beer, too, compared with Arthur Andersen, the once-prestigious accounting firm which imploded because of its close involvement with the Enron meltdown, or with the Rigas family, who used their publicly traded cable company, Adelphia, to extend more than $3bn in personal loans to themselves at the cost of the business itself, or even with Gary Winnick, the chief executive of the communications network-building company Global Crossing, who cashed out $374m in company shares shortly before it declared bankruptcy.
 
It seems almost perverse that of all the corporate scandals to have sullied the Bush administration's tenure add to the hall of shame Bernie Ebbers of Worldcom, Dennis Kozlowski of Tyco International, Henry Blodget of Merrill Lynch and Joseph Nacchio of Qwest Communications, to name just a few Stewart's venal but ultimately banal exercise in insider trading should have grabbed so much media space.
 
For a while it seemed as though she could claim scapegoat status and ask why the chief executives of bankrupt companies and perpetrators of grotesque acts of betrayal towards employees and shareholders were not also being hauled into court and tried on criminal charges. "Does anyone think any of our modern malefactors of great wealth will actually do time?" Paul Krugman, economic columnist for The New York Times wrote a couple of years ago, and at the time his scepticism seemed entirely warranted.
 
More recently there have been signs that Stewart could be the first of several high-profile defendants to face conviction. Some 28 former Enron employees have now been charged including Jeffrey Skilling, the company president, and Andrew Fastow, Enron's chief financial officer. Ken Lay, the chairman and close friend of the Bush family, has escaped indictment, but opinions vary on how long his exemption might last. This week, Mr Ebbers of Worldcom appeared in court to face federal charges that he orchestrated an $11bn accounting fraud at the telecommunications firm. He pleaded not guilty. Those from Adelphia John Rigas, two of his sons plus a former company accounting executive are currently on trial in Manhattan on charges of conspiracy, wire fraud, securities fraud and bank fraud. They have pleaded not guilty.
 
Also in New York, Mr Kozlowski and a former colleague from Tyco are on trial on 32 counts including grand larceny, conspiracy, securities fraud and falsifying business records. The fact that the most serious charge against them enterprise corruption was dropped yesterday is likely to come as only partial consolation.
 
© 2004 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd
 
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=498377




Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros