- Tenet, director of central intelligence since 1997, testified
that he had no contact at all with Bush in August, the month in which the
president received a CIA report suggesting that al-Qaida terrorists were
already in the United States and might be planning a domestic hijacking.
The agency later telephoned reporters on Wednesday to correct Tenet's testimony,
saying he did meet twice with the president that month, once during Bush's
nearly monthlong vacation that August at his Texas ranch and once when
the president returned to Washington later that month. In defending Bush
from recent allegations that he was not sufficiently attentive to domestic
terrorist threats before 9-11, the White House has cited his face-to-face
contacts with Tenet as proof of his interest.
- SenderBerl: So it has gone to correcting it from meeting
once to meeting on both August 17th and August 31st. I guess Tenet has
memory problems. Or does he? Here is where things get complex to convolute
truth to deny the American public justice. First, the CIA telephoning to
correct Tenet's testimony does not change Tenet's testimony under oath.
So he should be invited back to correct it under oath. Further, Tenet has
been acting as though he has been telling the truth but SenderBerl is aware
that if necessary the CIA would take all the blame for 9-11. Thus, it could
as part of the cover-up/whitewash/ or even part and parcel of the components
of government complicity in 9-11 to lay the foundation the heart of the
systemic problem Condy Rice claims the Bush administration could not cure
in 233 days. Our point is that it is all deflection and misdirection because
all the central issues and dynamics are derailed. Those include whether
Osama bin-Laden cells could have consummated the degree of terrorism seen
that day opening up the dynamic of the pod and of course the usual host
of issues proving complicity such as the President and the Secret Service's
weird behavior on 9-11 while at the Booker elementary school. We continually
point out below that you just can't pass up on the meaning of the failure
of NORAD to respond at all and Condy Rice ADMITTING that she wasn't even
briefed on terrorists using planes as missiles until May 2002. Again, the
NWO leadership is agreeing that Bush is out but on the predicate of Iraq
not 9-11 and thus the importance of pursuit of 9-11. We noted that two
of the 9-11 widows when confronted last night whether they were claiming
Bush and government complicity in 9-11 backed off from verifying such stance
and backtracked and said their interest was in preventing future terrorism.
They should have had the courage to raise the very questions they posited
to the 9-11 Commission, avoided by the Commission to date. We don't fault
them no matter how disappointed we are about it because others should have
carried the courage and obligation to say what is evident and crystal clear.
If anyone doubts Bush complicity he or she simply is willing to keep their
heads in the sand and unfortunately by doing so keeps the elitist centrix
in operational control of the country.
- You Have to Understand How the Administration Brings
Forth Lies and Deception to the 9-11 Commission
- Here is a vital excerpt of Dr. Rice's opening statement
to the 9-11 Commission heard and relied upon by the country and the world.
You tell us whether you see how the big lie is perpetrated by this administration.
- At the beginning of the administration President Bush
revived the practice of meeting with the director of central intelligence
almost every day in the Oval Office, meetings which I attended along with
the vice president and the chief of staff. At these meetings the president
received up-to-date intelligence and asked questions of his most senior
intelligence officials. From Jan. 20 through Sept. 10 the president received
at these daily meetings more than 40 briefing items on Al Qaeda. And 13
of those were in response to questions he or his top advisers posed.
- SenderBerl: We give up if the American public and media
now swallows this legerdemain. This is repulsive. First, the question arises
whether an opening statement is testimony and thus whether it is testimony
under oath. Next, Dr. Rice QUALIFIED that the President met with Tenet
daily only at the "beginning of the administration." Next, she
says that only "at the beginning of the administration" did Bush
asked questions. Next, when she says, "from Jan 20 to Sept 10 the
president received at these daily meetings more than 40 briefing items
on Al-Qaeda. And 13 of those were in response to questions he or his top
advisers posed," the very sad reality is that all these meetings could
have been done and consummated in the first 40 days of the administration
meaning that there could be perhaps as little as none or only one or two
meetings after May 2001. Thus, the reason the White House must have died
when Tenet testified UNDER OATH that he did not meet with Bush in August
2001 while Bush was on vacation for an entire month while the country faced
the threat of domestic terrorism. Moreover, ladies and gentlemen, the President's
was so on top of things that after taking thirty long days away, an historical
amount, from Washington, he decides to CHANGE HIS PLANS ON SEPTEMBER 7TH
TO TRAVEL TO FLORIDA TO READ WITH SECOND GRADE CHILDREN.
- WE ARE GOING TO GIVE UP IF YOU DON'T SHOUT AND HOLLER
LOUDLY AT THIS. THE 9-11 VICTIMS SHOULD BE IN ARMS AND SHOULD TELL THE
NATION AND WORLD THAT THEY BELIEVE THIS ADMINISTRATION IS DIRECTLY COMPLICIT
- We prove to you how they have no respect for our nation
and definitely not for you the individual citizen the fool that has allowed
them to get to where they are today. Sorry. Sad but true. Wake up, PLEASE!
- PLEASE FEEL FREE TO FORWARD THIS MATERIAL TO THE 9-11
COMMISSION SO THAT THEY CANNOT LATER SAY THEY MISSED THESE POINTS.