Rense.com




2000-2004 - The Years
Of Resignations

By Linda Gale Nolen
5-1-4



Almost every day we have read in newspapers, on Internet websites, and see on TV, a story about another "resignation". These resignations are coming from the political arena, the military and Corporate CEO's and top executives. As you know, this has been going on at an unprecedented rate, since our illustrious Supreme Court appointed Bush President in 2000.
 
Professionals in many categories have been resigning in larger numbers during these Bush Years. In whatever profession, it is increasingly a direct reaction to the policies, laws and agendas of this administration.
 
As I was reading an article in the New York Times about "over 100 Law- makers in Iran resigning," I began thinking of all the other surprising resignations in our country, England and other countries. I'm wondering if we might be reaching epidemic proportions of this increasing trend? Perhaps in the past many resignations didn't get as much media attention. Maybe these high numbers over the past year are not as unusual as it seems to me?
 
But, I think not.
 
There are, in some men, deep rooted moral consciences, which, even when they've stepped in do-do and have for awhile prostituted themselves and enjoyed the perks of going along with a government policy that is ruining their country, they one day realize they can no longer ignore their consciences.
 
Others are involuntarily resigned when they've failed to do the job the way their masters have instructed. Still others are put out to pasture when they are replaced by those fresh faces that the Bush Gang hopes we won't realize were hired to carry out the same administration agendas as those familiar faces and names,who resigned or were early-retired. Or in more shocking instances, those who were apparently in good health suddenly drop dead of heart attacks or "suicides" or plane crashes.
 
 
One example of a man who knew when to leave is Ari Fleischer. At least he was good at the job he had to do. While we (or I) could read between Ari's words easily, I was appreciative of his talent. He was the best liar I've ever seen in public life! But, I was happier of course, that I was not buying any of it either.
 
Scott McClellan has looked uncomfortable since his first day on the job. He just doesn't seem to believe what he says! He also doesn't seem to remember all of what he's been instructed to say. He stumbles enough to make me think this, anyway. If Bush 'wins' the 2004 election (God forbid) I expect that Scott will be 'retired' or 'resigned' before the Jan. 2005 inauguration, if not sooner. Then again, this may be only my wishful thinking.
 
Years ago when I worked in Corporate America I saw the same thing happen to many dedicated and long term employees. Usually, they'd be found suddenly lacking (read as incompetent) near their retirement dates. Sometimes, the official reason was that company cutbacks were necessary. Sometimes, if they were lucky, the company would send them off with a fairly decent early retirement package.
 
When I was 50, I was earning a comfortable $50,000 annually, in 1991, with a very uncomfortable commute and on-the-job stressors that caused me to spend a good portion of my weekly pay on medicines and doctor visits. I had perfect attendance and performance records thanks to Bufferin and antacids.
 
When my doctor told me that my declining health was caused simply by stress of the rat race, I decided to retire. But, not just from a particular corporation from Corporate America, completely.
 
I had worked for many years in various large corporations. The names and faces were different in each company, however, the game was always the same. Hard working very dedicated employees, in general, always lost. Even at the top, Presidents and CEO's were not safe from the game. I was never fired, but I resigned a number of times and then retired in 1991.
 
I'd seen and learned all there was for me to know about the end of the people-oriented companies era. What I'd seen and learned through those many years told me clearly that it could only get worse. And, now we see that it has. It's much worse than I imagined it would be, back in 1991.
 
One of my sons had a similar experience a few years ago while he was a computer Specialist at a major corporation. The $90,000 annual pay was excellent, for a young 30-something. Unfortunately, the stress got to him after only two years.
 
He had headaches and was sick to his stomach every day. So, he took a stress leave that gave him several months to recuperate. Fortunately, when he recuperated, he realized he could never stay healthy if he returned to Corporate America. He also knows he doesn't want to end up being resigned or retired at 40 or 50 from a company that had guaranteed him a wonderful pension package for his 'golden years', in order to entice him during an interview.
 
He told me, one day two years ago, that he finally knew what I'd been trying to tell him when I retired. However, the opportunity, the large salary and the promised benefits won the youth over. I'm sorry he had to learn these things the hard way, but at least he learned it in his 30's instead of in his 40's or 50's!
 
My other son, also a 30-something, saw at a much earlier age that all businesses were not only disinterested in employees' welfare, but that they were just using up their employees and unceremoniously spitting them out. Additionally, in the past several years we've become a country with more part time workers without benefits than full time workers with benefits.
 
Speaking of benefits, I would guess that the 20-something generation has never had a job with health benefits, paid vacations, and other company perks that used to be the norm before the end of the 1980's. It wouldn't surprise me if they don't even know how the word benefits used to apply in business. Now what they do know is that 'benefits' refers to the companies' gains. Nothing of benefit but low pay and job insecurity for the employees who do the work that keeps the companies in business.
 
Even 'retirees' are taking another hit this year. Have you read about it?
(See: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/03/business/03CARE.html?
ex=1077080400&en=461492b1d70756ed&ei=5004&partner=UNTD
New York Times, Companies Limit Health Coverage of Many Retirees, Feb. 3, 2004) So it seems to me that 'resignations' and early retirements are becoming a 21st Century phenomena, both in Companies and politics (which I realize is really the same business). Now we see people moving from job to job within very short time spans not even thinking about a five year company plan.
 
Remember the old days when you were interviewed and they seemed to think that you should want to stay for at least FIVE years? Those good old days when they energetically pitched wonderful retirement plans after 20, 25, or 30 years of employment. Ya don't see that anywhere now, do ya? Well if you do, let me know because I know some people whose unemployment benefits have run out, who would be standing in line for an interview.
 
Nah, it's too late. They probably wouldn't believe it now.




Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros